Literature DB >> 29960227

Carbon uptake by European agricultural land is variable, and in many regions could be increased: Evidence from remote sensing, yield statistics and models of potential productivity.

Mathias Neumann1, Pete Smith2.   

Abstract

Agricultural plants, covering large parts of the global land surface and important for the livelihoods of people worldwide, fix carbon dioxide seasonally via photosynthesis. The carbon allocation of crops, however, remains relatively understudied compared to, for example, forests. For comprehensive consistent resource assessments or climate change impact studies large-scale reliable vegetation information is needed. Here, we demonstrate how robust data on carbon uptake in croplands can be obtained by combining multiple sources to enhance the reliability of estimates. Using yield statistics, a remote-sensing based productivity algorithm and climate-sensitive potential productivity, we mapped the potential to increase crop productivity and compared consistent carbon uptake information of agricultural land with forests. The productivity gap in Europe is higher in Eastern and Southern than in Central-Western countries. At continental scale, European agriculture shows a greater carbon uptake in harvestable compartments than forests (agriculture 1.96 vs. forests 1.76 t C ha-1 year-1). Mapping productivity gaps allows efforts to enhance crop production to be prioritized by, for example, improved crop cultivars, nutrient management or pest control. The concepts and methods for quantifying carbon uptake used in this study are applicable worldwide and allow forests and agriculture to be included in future carbon uptake assessments.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioeconomy; Biomass; Carbon sequestration; Crops; EUROSTAT; Harvest; Net Primary Production; Yield gap

Year:  2018        PMID: 29960227     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.268

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  1 in total

Review 1.  How to measure, report and verify soil carbon change to realize the potential of soil carbon sequestration for atmospheric greenhouse gas removal.

Authors:  Pete Smith; Jean-Francois Soussana; Denis Angers; Louis Schipper; Claire Chenu; Daniel P Rasse; Niels H Batjes; Fenny van Egmond; Stephen McNeill; Matthias Kuhnert; Cristina Arias-Navarro; Jorgen E Olesen; Ngonidzashe Chirinda; Dario Fornara; Eva Wollenberg; Jorge Álvaro-Fuentes; Alberto Sanz-Cobena; Katja Klumpp
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2019-10-06       Impact factor: 10.863

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.