Bin Jing1, Bo Liu2, Hui Li3, Jianfeng Lei4, Zhanjing Wang4, Yutao Yang2, Phillip Zhe Sun5, Bing Xue4, Hesheng Liu6, Zhi-Qing David Xu7. 1. School of Biomedical Engineering, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. 2. Department of Neurobiology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. 3. Department of Anatomy, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. 4. Core Facilities for Medical Imaging, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. 5. Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA. 6. Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA; Institute for Research and Medical Consultations, Imam Abdulahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia. Electronic address: hesheng@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu. 7. Department of Neurobiology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. Electronic address: zhiqingx@ccmu.edu.cn.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Various neurological and psychological disorders are related to cortical volume changes in specific brain regions, which can be measured in vivo using structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI). There is an increasing interest in MRI studies using rat models, especially in longitudinal studies of brain disorders and pharmacologic interventions. However, morphometric changes observed in sMRI are only meaningful if the measurements are reliable. To date, a systematic evaluation of the test-retest reliability of the morphometric measures in the rat brain is still lacking. NEW METHOD: We rigorously evaluated the test-retest reliability of morphometric measures derived from the voxel-based morphometry (VBM) analysis. 37 Sprague-Dawley rats were scanned twice at an interval of six hours and the gray matter volume was estimated using the VBM-DARTEL method. The intraclass coefficient, percent volume change and Pearson correlation coefficient were used to evaluate the reliability in 96 subregions of the rat brain. RESULTS: Most subregions showed excellent test-retest reliabilities within an interval of 6 h while a few regions demonstrated lower reliability, especially in the retrosplenial granular cortex. The results were consistent between different methods of reliability assessment. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to quantify the test-retest reliability of the VBM measurements of the rat brain. CONCLUSION: Atlas-based cortical volume of the rat brain can be reliably estimated using the VBM-DARTEL method in most subregions. However, findings in subregions with lower reliability must be interpreted with caution.
BACKGROUND: Various neurological and psychological disorders are related to cortical volume changes in specific brain regions, which can be measured in vivo using structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI). There is an increasing interest in MRI studies using rat models, especially in longitudinal studies of brain disorders and pharmacologic interventions. However, morphometric changes observed in sMRI are only meaningful if the measurements are reliable. To date, a systematic evaluation of the test-retest reliability of the morphometric measures in the rat brain is still lacking. NEW METHOD: We rigorously evaluated the test-retest reliability of morphometric measures derived from the voxel-based morphometry (VBM) analysis. 37 Sprague-Dawley rats were scanned twice at an interval of six hours and the gray matter volume was estimated using the VBM-DARTEL method. The intraclass coefficient, percent volume change and Pearson correlation coefficient were used to evaluate the reliability in 96 subregions of the rat brain. RESULTS: Most subregions showed excellent test-retest reliabilities within an interval of 6 h while a few regions demonstrated lower reliability, especially in the retrosplenial granular cortex. The results were consistent between different methods of reliability assessment. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to quantify the test-retest reliability of the VBM measurements of the rat brain. CONCLUSION: Atlas-based cortical volume of the rat brain can be reliably estimated using the VBM-DARTEL method in most subregions. However, findings in subregions with lower reliability must be interpreted with caution.
Authors: M M Quallo; C J Price; K Ueno; T Asamizuya; K Cheng; R N Lemon; A Iriki Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2009-10-09 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: G Chételat; B Landeau; F Eustache; F Mézenge; F Viader; V de la Sayette; B Desgranges; J-C Baron Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2005-10-01 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Sarah Biedermann; Johannes Fuss; Lei Zheng; Alexander Sartorius; Claudia Falfán-Melgoza; Traute Demirakca; Peter Gass; Gabriele Ende; Wolfgang Weber-Fahr Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2012-04-12 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Timothy O Laumann; Evan M Gordon; Babatunde Adeyemo; Abraham Z Snyder; Sung Jun Joo; Mei-Yen Chen; Adrian W Gilmore; Kathleen B McDermott; Steven M Nelson; Nico U F Dosenbach; Bradley L Schlaggar; Jeanette A Mumford; Russell A Poldrack; Steven E Petersen Journal: Neuron Date: 2015-07-23 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: Sophia Mueller; Danhong Wang; Michael D Fox; Ruiqi Pan; Jie Lu; Kuncheng Li; Wei Sun; Randy L Buckner; Hesheng Liu Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2015-08-20 Impact factor: 5.038