Literature DB >> 29959951

A systematic review on economic evaluations of school-based lifestyle interventions targeting weight-related behaviours among 4-12 year olds: Issues and ways forward.

Marije Oosterhoff1, Hans Bosma2, Onno C P van Schayck3, Silvia M A A Evers4, Carmen D Dirksen5, Manuela A Joore5.   

Abstract

Current guidelines for economic evaluations do not provide specific recommendations for the evaluation of school-based lifestyle interventions. This study examined and discussed the key aspects in the design of economic evaluations on school-based interventions targeting weight-related behaviours among 4-12 year olds. The PubMed and CRD databases (NHS EED) were searched. Grey literature was identified from reference lists and websites of relevant organizations. Full economic evaluations on school-based interventions targeting physical activity, sedentariness, or diet were selected. Key aspects included the objective, audience, intervention, comparator, population, type of analysis, perspective, costs, outcomes, and time horizon. Information was also extracted on measuring and valuing costs and outcomes, linking and extrapolating outcomes, and the maintenance of intervention effects. The 23 included studies reported on cost-effectiveness (CEAs) (N = 12), cost-utility (CUAs) (N = 9), social cost benefit (SCBA) (N = 2), and social return on investment (SROI) (N = 1) analysis. The usual practice comparator was generally not clearly defined. The SROI analysis was the single study that included outcomes in other persons than the child. Healthcare costs (N = 14), productivity costs (N = 4), and costs to the household (N = 3), or education (N = 2) sector were examined. The outcome in trial-based CEAs consisted of a variety of weight-related measures. Seven distinctive models were used to extrapolate health and/or productivity costs. To enhance the usefulness of economic evaluations on school-based lifestyle interventions in allocating public health budgets, transparent reporting on key aspects, broadening the scope of economic evaluations, and standardizing the measurement, valuation, and extrapolation of costs and outcomes should be improved. This study was conducted in Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cost effectiveness; Economic evaluation; Elementary school; Lifestyle prevention; Methods

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29959951     DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.06.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  5 in total

1.  Cost-Effectiveness of an Obesity Management Program for 6- to 15-Year-Old Children in Poland: Data from Over Three Thousand Participants.

Authors:  Ewa Bandurska; Michał Brzeziński; Paulina Metelska; Marzena Zarzeczna-Baran
Journal:  Obes Facts       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 3.942

2.  Use of Economic Evidence When Prioritising Public Health Interventions in Schools: A Qualitative Study with School Staff.

Authors:  Katie Breheny; Emma Frew; Iestyn Williams; Sandra Passmore; Joanna Coast
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 3.  Methodological issues in economic evaluations of disease prevention and health promotion: an overview of systematic and scoping reviews.

Authors:  Yana Seleznova; Adrienne Alayli; Stephanie Stock; Dirk Müller
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-11-20       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 4.  Methods for the economic evaluation of obesity prevention dietary interventions in children: A systematic review and critical appraisal of the evidence.

Authors:  Sundus Mahdi; Colette Marr; Nicola J Buckland; Jim Chilcott
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 10.867

5.  The Short-Term Value of the "Healthy Primary School of the Future" Initiative: A Social Return on Investment Analysis.

Authors:  Marije Oosterhoff; Onno C P van Schayck; Nina H M Bartelink; Hans Bosma; Maartje Willeboordse; Bjorn Winkens; Manuela A Joore
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2020-08-21
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.