Literature DB >> 29959557

Mass poisoning with NPS: 2C-E and Bromo-DragonFly.

S Iwersen-Bergmann1, S Lehmann2, A Heinemann3, C Schröder3, A Müller3, H Jungen3, H Andresen-Streichert3,2, K Pueschel3, C Vidal4, K Mercer-Chalmers-Bender2,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reports of intoxications with new psychoactive substances (NPS) mostly involve young people, as they are the main consumers of these types of drugs. This report centers on a case that was unusual due to it being a mass-poisoning event involving middle-aged individuals who had consumed a combination of the two different new psychoactive drugs 2,5-dimethoxy-4-ethylphenethylamine (2C-E) and 1-(8-bromofuro[2,3-f][1]benzofuran-4-yl)-2-propanamine (Bromo-DragonFly, BDF). CASE HISTORY: The mass poisoning of 29 individuals (24-56 years old) resulted in their admission to six different hospitals with severe symptoms of intoxication. All symptoms manifested after consumption of an unknown drug formulation around lunchtime during an esoteric weekend seminar. INVESTIGATION: Urine (n = 11) and blood samples (n = 29), collected from the 29 individuals for police investigation, were analyzed with immunochemical techniques, GC/MS and LC-MS/MS. 2C-E was confirmed in seven urine samples, but not in blood. BDF was confirmed in all urine samples, and in 17 blood samples. The blood samples exhibited BDF concentrations between ca. 0.6 and ca. 2.0 μg/L, while urine concentrations of BDF ranged from ca. 1.6 to 35 μg/L. The concentration of 2C-E in urine was found to be between ca. 1.5 and 183 μg/L. All patients made a complete recovery, although some had required mechanical ventilation.
CONCLUSION: The investigation and the presentation of this case illustrates not only mass intoxication with 2C-E and BDF, with corresponding blood and urine concentrations, but also the necessity of collecting urine samples in cases where NPS-consumption is suspected, in order to improve the chances of analytical detection.

Entities:  

Keywords:  2C-E; Blood; Bromo-DragonFly; Concentration; Mass poisoning; Urine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29959557     DOI: 10.1007/s00414-018-1882-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Legal Med        ISSN: 0937-9827            Impact factor:   2.686


  4 in total

1.  Methiopropamine and its acute behavioral effects in mice: is there a gray zone in new psychoactive substances users?

Authors:  Fabio De-Giorgio; Sabrine Bilel; Micaela Tirri; Raffaella Arfè; Claudio Trapella; Cristian Camuto; Federica Foti; Paolo Frisoni; Margherita Neri; Francesco Botrè; Matteo Marti
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 2.686

Review 2.  Reports of Adverse Events Associated with Use of Novel Psychoactive Substances, 2017-2020: A Review.

Authors:  Amanda L A Mohr; Barry K Logan; Melissa F Fogarty; Alex J Krotulski; Donna M Papsun; Sherri L Kacinko; Marilyn A Huestis; Jeri D Ropero-Miller
Journal:  J Anal Toxicol       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 3.220

Review 3.  New psychoactive substances: a review and updates.

Authors:  Abu Shafi; Alex J Berry; Harry Sumnall; David M Wood; Derek K Tracy
Journal:  Ther Adv Psychopharmacol       Date:  2020-12-17

Review 4.  Designer drugs: mechanism of action and adverse effects.

Authors:  Dino Luethi; Matthias E Liechti
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 5.153

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.