Literature DB >> 29959391

Genetic Factors and Genotype-Environment Interactions Contribute to Variation in Melanin Production in the Fungal Pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans.

Himeshi Samarasinghe1, David Aceituno-Caicedo1, Massimo Cogliati2, Kyung J Kwon-Chung3, Volker Rickerts4, Aristea Velegraki5, Sevim Ackaglar6, Jianping Xu7.   

Abstract

Cryptococcosis is a common opportunistic fungal infection that often disseminates into the central nervous system, leading to meningitis. Production of melanin pigments during infections is one of the most important virulence factors of its causal agent, the human pathogenic yeast Cryptococcus neoformans species complex. However, almost nothing is known about the patterns of variation in melanin production among clinical and environmental strains and the potential effects of such variations on virulence. In this study, we assembled a global collection of C. neoformans var. neoformans strains and investigated their patterns of melanin variation and potential contributors to such variations. Our analyses revealed that genetic differences and genotype-environment interactions explained up to 59% and 43% of the population's melanin variance respectively, depending on the tested environments. In comparison, environmental factors alone contributed relatively little to melanin variance. We also identified specific changes within the LAC1 gene, whose protein product catalyzes melanin synthesis, to be associated with variable melanin levels. This study provides fresh insights into the origin and evolution of virulence traits in fungal pathogens while highlighting the complex interplay between genetic and environmental factors that lead to phenotypic variance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29959391      PMCID: PMC6026209          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-27813-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


Introduction

Melanin pigments, polymers of oxidized substrates with a characteristic black/dark brown color, are ubiquitous in nature with many organisms ranging from microbes to humans producing them for a variety of reasons. In the pathogenic yeast Cryptococcus neoformans species complex (CNSC), melanin production is a major virulence factor that promotes the survival of yeast cells inside mammalian hosts[1]. CNSC is an opportunistic environmental pathogen of humans and other mammals capable of causing a range of infections including skin lesions, lung infections and meningoencephalitis, collectively known as cryptococcosis[2-4]. CNSC includes strains of two major serotypes, C. neoformans var. grubii (serotype A) and C. neoformans var. neoformans (serotype D), both of which mainly infect immunocompromised individuals[5,6]. Once inside the host, cryptococcal cells are phagocytosed by the macrophages but they can resist being digested and persist as an intracellular parasite[7-9]. Macrophages release bursts of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) into the phogosomes to create a highly oxidizing environment that is fatally damaging to most engulfed microorganisms[10]. Previous studies suggest that melanin pigments produced by the cryptococcal cells act as a radical scavenger resulting in the removal of harmful oxygen and nitrogen radicals from the cellular environment[11-14]. Indeed, mutant CNSC strains whose melanin production has been eliminated are avirulent in mice[15,16]. CNSC has a worldwide distribution and is naturally found in the soil, often in association with pigeon droppings[17]: C. neoformans var. grubii is the more prevalent variety with strains having been isolated from all continents except Antarctica[18]. C. neoformans var. neoformans is mostly found in temperate climates with a high prevalence in Northern Europe and the Mediterranean region[19]. The ability to produce melanin pigments likely evolved in CNSC as a defense mechanism against stressors commonly found in its natural habitat, such as UV light and high temperatures[20,21]. The presence of similar stressors inside mammalian hosts may have allowed CNSC to become an opportunistic pathogen[22]. The melanin biosynthesis pathway in CNSC has been well characterized with all the major steps and substrates identified. Diphenolic compounds such as dopamine are taken up from the environment and shuttled through a series of oxidization reactions catalyzed by a laccase named LAC1, which is followed by polymerization to yield the melanin pigments[23,24]. We have observed melanin production to vary between both clinical and environmental strains of CNSC with the yeast colonies ranging from white to increasingly dark shades of brown/black. LAC1 was shown to be essential for melanin biosynthesis in CNSC through a series of knock-out experiments[16]: however, genetic factors contributing to quantitative variation in pigmentation between natural strains remain largely unknown. A previous quantitative trait loci (QTL) analysis identified five genomic regions that contributed to variation in melanisation among the progeny of a hybrid cross between a serotype A (C. neoformans var. grubii) strain and a serotype D (C. neoformans var. neoformans) strain[25]. While one of these QTL regions included LAC1, the relationships between specific genetic polymorphisms within LAC1 and differential pigmentation were not identified. Furthermore, other genes with a potential role in melanin variation in CNSC remain to be elucidated. It is also unclear if and to what extent environmental factors affect the variation in melanin production within CNSC. In this study, we quantified the melanin production of 54 C. neoformans var. neoformans (i.e. serotype D, abbreviated CND hereafter) strains originated from 9 countries in 3 continents, in both ideal growth conditions as well as in thermal, oxidative and nitrosative stress. These are three common stressors encountered by cryptococcal cells in their natural habitat as well as inside mammalian hosts during an infection. We also conducted multilocus sequence typing to assess the degree of genetic variation in the study population. Our objective was to assess the contribution of genetic, environmental and genotype-environment interaction factors to variation in melanin production in the study population. We also sequenced the promoter and coding region of LAC1 in all the strains to identify polymorphisms that were correlated with melanin levels.

Results

Variation in melanin production

A total of 54 strains of CND from nine countries were analyzed in this study (Table 1). Significant variation in melanin production among these strains was observed at 30 °C after 3-days’ growth, with the highest producer being 52 times more pigmented than the lowest producer of the population (Fig. 1). Similar or slightly higher ranges of melanin levels were observed in low and intermediate oxidative stress, and in low and intermediate nitrosative stress, whereas significantly lower variation among strains was observed in thermal stress, high oxidative stress and high nitrosative stress. Clinical strains (n = 28) produced significantly more melanin on average than the environmental isolates (n = 24) at 37 °C (p = 0.011). In all other conditions, clinical and environmental populations did not significantly differ in average melanin production. Melanin production was found to be correlated with the mating type of the strains in 3 out of the 8 tested conditions. The CND population included 39 MATα strains and 15 MATa strains. In thermal and low oxidative stress, MATα strains produced significantly more melanin than MATa strains (p = 0.0007 and p = 0.03 respectively), whereas in high oxidative stress, MATa strains significantly out-produced MATα strains (p = 0.03). In all other conditions, average melanin production of the MATα strains was higher than that of MATa strains although these differences were not statistically significant. According to ANOVA results, melanin levels were not correlated with geographical origin or source of isolation of the strains.
Table 1

Strains of C. neoformans var. neoformans (serotype D) analyzed in this study.

Strain codeCategoryOriginSourceYear isolatedUnderlying conditionMolecular TypeMating type
B3176ENVDenmarkPigeon nest1970α
B3179CLNMaryland, USACSFα
CAP67-2CLNUSAα
GRACA18BK1–3ENVGreeceEucalyptus tree2013VNIVa
GRACP15SO1–2ENVGreecePine tree2013VNIVa
GRACP30BK1–1ENVGreecePlane tree2013VNIVa
GRAKI13HO1–1ENVGreecePlane tree2013VNIVa
GRAKI28HO1–1ENVGreeceOlive tree2013VNIVa
GRLMM26HO1–2ENVGreeceOlive tree2013VNIVa
ITMPV22BK7–1ENVItalyOak tree2014VNIVα
IUM 01-0956SCCItalySkin, head2001AIDSVNIVα
IUM 01-4729ENVBelgiumPigeon droppings2001VNIVα
IUM 01-4730ENVBelgiumDust2001VNIVα
IUM 02-0826VETItalyCat2002VNIVa
IUM 02-4295PPCCItalySkin2002No known risk factorsVNIVa
IUM 77-0033SCCItalySkin, right ear1977No known risk factorsVNIVα
IUM 79-0801PCCItalySkin, left leg1979Common variable immunodeficiencyVNIVα
IUM 93-1656DCItalyCSF1993AIDSVNIVα
IUM 97-4899PPCCBelgiumSkin1997No risk factorsVNIVα
IUM 98-2742SCCItalySkin, left hand1998AIDSVNIVα
IUM 98-4987PPCCItalySkin1998Breast tumorVNIVα
IUM 98-5036CLNBelgiumSkin1998DiabetesVNIVα
JEC20LABVNIVa
JEC21LABVNIVα
M9112PCCJapanSkin1985No known risk factorsVNIVα
MAS92-0088CLNUSABloodVNIVα
MAS92-0111CLNUSAVNIVα
MAS92-0226CLNUSAVNIVα
MAS92-0232CLNUSAVNIVα
MAS92-0397CLNUSAVNIVα
MAS92-0403CLNUSAVNIVα
MAS92-0621CLNUSAVNIVα
MAS92-0764CLNUSAVNIVα
MAS93-0216CLNUSAVNIVα
MAS94-0176CLNUSAVNIVα
NIH-116ENVVirginia, USAPigeon nest1960VNIVα
NIH-424ENVDenmarkPigeon nest1970VNIVα
NIH-426ENVDenmarkPigeon nest1970VNIVα
NIH-430ENVDenmarkPigeon nest1970VNIVa
NIH-431ENVDenmarkPigeon nest1970VNIVα
NIH-432ENVDenmarkPigeon nest1970VNIVα
NIH-433ENVDenmarkPigeon nest1970VNIVa
NIH-434ENVDenmarkPigeon nest1970VNIVα
NIH-442ENVDenmarkPigeon nest1970VNIVα
PD1596VETItalyCat2010VNIVα
PD32VETItalyCat2009VNIVα
RKI 13-0490ENVGermanyPigeon droppings2013VNIVa
RKI 13-0491ENVGermanyPigeon droppings2013VNIVa
RKI 13-0492ENVGermanyPigeon droppings2013VNIVa
RKI 14-1061.4ENVGermanya
TRNCGB1H01-1ENVTurkeyPine tree2013VNIVα
Y286-90CLNCanadaCSFVNIVα
Y290-90CLNCanadaCSFVNIVα
Y494-91CLNAtlanta, USAVNIVα

PCC = primary cutaneous cyrptococcosis; PPCC = probable primary cutaneous cryptococcosis; SCC = secondary cutaneous cryptococcosis; DC = disseminated cryptococcosis; ENV = environment; VET = veterinary; CLN = clinical; CSF = cerebrospinal fluid; LAB = laboratory.

Figure 1

Melanin production of individual C. neoformans var. neoformans strains in different environmental conditions. The melanin production of 54 C. neoformans var. neoformans strains was quantified in 8 different conditions: from left, 30 °C, 37 °C, low (0.25 mM H2O2), intermediate (0.5 mM H2O2) and high (1 mM H2O2) oxidative stress, and low (0.25 mM NaNO2), intermediate (0.5 mM NaNO2) and high (1 mM NaNO2) nitrosative stress. Pigment density of the colonies was measured following 3-days’ growth on caffeic acid agar medium. Colonies of a few representative strains from 30 °C are shown on left.

Strains of C. neoformans var. neoformans (serotype D) analyzed in this study. PCC = primary cutaneous cyrptococcosis; PPCC = probable primary cutaneous cryptococcosis; SCC = secondary cutaneous cryptococcosis; DC = disseminated cryptococcosis; ENV = environment; VET = veterinary; CLN = clinical; CSF = cerebrospinal fluid; LAB = laboratory. Melanin production of individual C. neoformans var. neoformans strains in different environmental conditions. The melanin production of 54 C. neoformans var. neoformans strains was quantified in 8 different conditions: from left, 30 °C, 37 °C, low (0.25 mM H2O2), intermediate (0.5 mM H2O2) and high (1 mM H2O2) oxidative stress, and low (0.25 mM NaNO2), intermediate (0.5 mM NaNO2) and high (1 mM NaNO2) nitrosative stress. Pigment density of the colonies was measured following 3-days’ growth on caffeic acid agar medium. Colonies of a few representative strains from 30 °C are shown on left. As shown in Fig. 2, the average melanin production of the CND population was significantly higher at the ideal growth temperature of 30 °C with no added stressors than that at thermal stress (p = 1.56E-06) and at all three tested concentrations of oxidative stress (p = 3.09E-05, 0.00459, 5.28E-11 respectively for low, intermediate and high oxidative stress). Interestingly, while the average melanin production was lower in both low and high nitrosative stress (not statistically significant), this was not the case in intermediate nitrosative stress where the average melanin production was in fact considerably higher than that at 30 °C (p = 0.00032). Melanin production in intermediate nitrosative stress was significantly higher than that in low (p = 3.09E-05) and high nitrosative stress (p = 5.75E-11). By quantifying the amount of LAC1 mRNA transcripts in two representative strains, we found that LAC1 gene expression was significantly up-regulated in intermediate nitrosative stress compared to low and high nitrosative stress (Fig. 3). Our results suggest that LAC1 expression and consequently melanin production is upregulated in CND within a narrow window of nitrogen radical concentrations (0.25 mM NaNO2 1 mM NaNO2).
Figure 2

Average melanin production of the C. neoformans var. neoformans population in different environments. The melanin levels of the C. neoformans var. neoformans population was quantified: from left, in 30 °C, 37 °C, low oxidative stress (0.25 mM H2O2), intermediate oxidative stress (0.5 mM H2O2), high oxidative stress (1 mM H2O2), low nitrosative stress (0.25 mM NaNO2), intermediate nitrosative stress (0.5 mM NaNO2) and high nitrosative stress (1 mM NaNO2). The dashed line represents the average melanin production of the population in the negative control (no added stressors). The red stars above the boxplots represent the degree of statistical significance to which the average melanin production differs from that of the negative control.

Figure 3

Normalized LAC1 expression in low, intermediate and high nitrosative stress conditions. The abundance of LAC1 mRNA transcripts was quantified in two representative strains from the study population using RT-qPCR. In both strains, the normalized LAC1 expression was correlated with the corresponding level of melanin production. LAC1 expression was induced in intermediate nitrosative stress in comparison to low and high nitrosative stress.

Average melanin production of the C. neoformans var. neoformans population in different environments. The melanin levels of the C. neoformans var. neoformans population was quantified: from left, in 30 °C, 37 °C, low oxidative stress (0.25 mM H2O2), intermediate oxidative stress (0.5 mM H2O2), high oxidative stress (1 mM H2O2), low nitrosative stress (0.25 mM NaNO2), intermediate nitrosative stress (0.5 mM NaNO2) and high nitrosative stress (1 mM NaNO2). The dashed line represents the average melanin production of the population in the negative control (no added stressors). The red stars above the boxplots represent the degree of statistical significance to which the average melanin production differs from that of the negative control. Normalized LAC1 expression in low, intermediate and high nitrosative stress conditions. The abundance of LAC1 mRNA transcripts was quantified in two representative strains from the study population using RT-qPCR. In both strains, the normalized LAC1 expression was correlated with the corresponding level of melanin production. LAC1 expression was induced in intermediate nitrosative stress in comparison to low and high nitrosative stress.

Multilocus sequence typing

We performed multilocus sequence typing (MLST) on all 54 CND strains according to the ISHAM consensus scheme for CNSC[26] which includes seven MLST loci, namely CAP59, GPD1, IGS1, LAC1, PLB1, SOD1 and URA5. The seven loci are located on six different chromosomes and were shown to be capable of capturing the major genetic variation among CNSC strains[26]. The concatenated sequences of the seven loci resulted in 4092-bp long sequences, alignment of which revealed the presence of 39 different sequence types – STs (Table 2). ANOVA results failed to show any correlation between MLST sequence types and melanin levels in any of the eight tested environmental conditions. Similarly, according to the maximum parsimony trees created (data not shown), STs were not significantly correlated with geographical origin, or source of isolation of the strains.
Table 2

MLST allele types and sequence types of the C. neoformans var. neoformans strains at seven loci. Accession numbers for the full length LAC1 sequences are also listed here.

StrainCombined MLST Sequence Type CAP59 GPD1 IGS1 LAC1 PLB1 SOD1 URA5 GenBank Accession of full LAC1 sequence
B317651517212813131716MG963844
B317916016213019131719MG963845
CAP67-2NST417212813141716MG963846
GRACA18BK1-350226383022131918MG963863
GRACP15SO1–249926213022131918MG963862
GRACP30BK1-149826203017131918MG963861
GRAKI13HO1-150326393022131918MG963842
GRAKI28HO1-150026224417142323MG963843
GRLMM26HO1-248911111271MG963864
ITMPV22BK7-14961633019131719MG963877
IUM 01-095652127131269813MG963867
IUM 01-472951016212418132032MG963865
IUM 01-473051416402420132032MG963866
IUM 02-082651722213024211720MG963868
IUM 02-42955162233124141720MG963869
IUM 77-003313527224324131720MG963871
IUM 79-08015202734324131720MG963870
IUM 93-165627922223122141734MG963874
IUM 97-48995071632639142034MG963876
IUM 98-274211216223124141716MG963873
IUM 98-498751826213115211915MG963875
IUM 98-50365061632420132032MG963872
JEC20NST617212819141720MG963878
JEC21NST617212819141720MG963879
M911216822213022141718MG963880
MAS92-008811416212624181722MG963852
MAS92-0111NST324218421141734MG963853
MAS92-022616016213019131719MG963855
MAS92-023216016213019131719MG963856
MAS92-039711416212624181722MG963847
MAS92-040311416212624181722MG963848
MAS92-062116016213019131719MG963849
MAS92-076416516224824132317MG963850
MAS93-021616516224824132317MG963851
MAS94-017616016213019131719MG963854
NIH-11613527224324131720MG963881
NIH-42418020212621191721MG963882
NIH-42627016285324141720MG963883
NIH-43050916202416142016MG963884
NIH-43118020212621191721MG963885
NIH-432NST116292420132018MG963886
NIH-43351517212813141716MG963887
NIH-434NST216213119131916MG963888
NIH-44218020212621191721MG963889
PD159625222223019142341MG963890
PD3229416212420132232MG963891
RKI 13-049052227215319141916MG963858
RKI 13-049152329218321145853MG963859
RKI 13-049252429218340145853MG963860
RKI 14-1061.413527224324131720MG963857
TRNCGB1H01-14971621242013132MG963892
Y286-9116016213019131719MG963893
Y290-9116016213019131719MG963894
Y494-91NST626213219132220MG963895

NST = New Sequence Type.

MLST allele types and sequence types of the C. neoformans var. neoformans strains at seven loci. Accession numbers for the full length LAC1 sequences are also listed here. NST = New Sequence Type.

LAC1 gene sequence

The LAC1 gene fragment sequenced as part of MLST typing was 473-bp in length and most of it was located within an intron. To further elucidate genetic polymorphisms within LAC1, we sequenced the entire LAC1 gene and its promoter in all 54 strains adding up to a total length of 4835-bp. A total of 110 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were found within the combined promoter, exons, and intronic regions of the LAC1 gene, leading to 21 different LAC1 alleles in the population. Fifteen SNPs were present at a minor allele frequency (MAF) ≥10%, with 11 of them located in the promoter region (Fig. 4) and 4 SNPs causing non-synonymous amino acid changes in the coding region (Fig. 5). Concatenating these 15 SNPs identified the presence of 11 different LAC1 haplotypes with the majority of the strains (42/54) belonging to 4 haplotype groups. The haplotypes were numbered from 1 to 11 depending on their prevalence with 1 being the most prevalent (14/54) and 11 being the least common (1/54). Strains of similar origin (clinical vs. environmental) tended to cluster within haplotypes. For example, in haplotype 1, 12 out of the 14 strains were environmental, whereas in haplotype 2, 8 out of the 9 strains were of clinical origin.
Figure 4

LAC1 promoter and 5′ UTR. This schematic shows the Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) and INDELs that we found within the promoter and 5′ untranslated regions (UTR) of the LAC1 gene, in our study population of C. neoformans var. neoformans. Only those polymorphisms with a minor allele frequency threshold ≥10% are shown here. The green regions within the promoter represent transcriptional enhancer elements and the red regions represent the transcriptional repressor elements identified in a previous study[27]. One SNP, −925 G/A, was located within a transcriptional repressor element.

Figure 5

LAC1 coding region. This schematic shows the Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) that we found within the coding region of the LAC1 gene, in our study population of C. neoformans var. neoformans. Only those SNPs with a minor allele frequency ≥10% are shown here. The green boxes represent exons and the white boxes in between represent the introns. The four SNPs highlighted in red cause non-synonymous amino acid changes whereas the rest are synonymous SNPs. Three of the four non-synonymous SNPs are located within putative catalytic domains of the Lac1 protein.

LAC1 promoter and 5′ UTR. This schematic shows the Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) and INDELs that we found within the promoter and 5′ untranslated regions (UTR) of the LAC1 gene, in our study population of C. neoformans var. neoformans. Only those polymorphisms with a minor allele frequency threshold ≥10% are shown here. The green regions within the promoter represent transcriptional enhancer elements and the red regions represent the transcriptional repressor elements identified in a previous study[27]. One SNP, −925 G/A, was located within a transcriptional repressor element. LAC1 coding region. This schematic shows the Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) that we found within the coding region of the LAC1 gene, in our study population of C. neoformans var. neoformans. Only those SNPs with a minor allele frequency ≥10% are shown here. The green boxes represent exons and the white boxes in between represent the introns. The four SNPs highlighted in red cause non-synonymous amino acid changes whereas the rest are synonymous SNPs. Three of the four non-synonymous SNPs are located within putative catalytic domains of the Lac1 protein. Our analyses identified that LAC1 haplotypes were significantly associated with melanin production in thermal stress (p = 0.0138) and high oxidative stress (p = 0.00602). Within these two conditions, we tested the 15 SNPs individually using ANOVA tests to identify those that were significantly associated with melanin production. One SNP in the promoter region, A-1496G, was significantly correlated with melanin production in thermal stress (p = 2.86E-03). Strains with G at this position produced significantly more melanin than strains with A at 37 °C. In high oxidative stress, two SNPs, A-925G and C544G/A, were significantly correlated with melanin production. The former is located within a previously identified repressor region of the LAC1 promoter[27] whereas the latter is located within the putative copper-oxidase domain of the LAC1 protein and causes a non-synonymous amino acid switch from proline to threonine or alanine (P182T/A). Eight out of the 54 strains (GRAKI13HO1-1, GRAKI28HO1-1, GRACA18BK1-3, GRACP15SO1-2, GRACP30BK1-1, GRAKI13HO1-1, GRAKI28HO1-1, GRLMM26HO1-2, IUM 01-0956 and M9112) contain alanine at this position and produce significantly more melanin than the rest of the population.

Contribution of genetic, environmental and genetic-environmental interaction factors to melanin variation

We conducted a series of two-factor ANOVAs to determine the relative proportion of melanin variance explained by overall genetic differences, environmental factors and genotype-environment interactions, as well as the LAC1 gene and the MAT locus. The combined genetic factors were the biggest contributor to the overall variation in melanin production in all three stress conditions with them explaining 56%, 51% and 59% of the variance in thermal, oxidative and nitrosative stresses respectively (Fig. 6). Genotype-environment interaction effects were also a significant contributor at 28%, 43% and 29% respectively. In contrast, though statistically significant, environmental factors alone explained relatively little of the overall melanin variance at 15%, 5% and 11% respectively. Among the genetic factors, the LAC1 locus accounted for 13% to 30% of the total variance depending on the environmental condition. In thermal and oxidative stress, the contribution of LAC1 to melanin variance increased with higher levels of stress. However, in nitrosative stress, the biggest contribution from LAC1 to melanin production was found at intermediate nitrosative stress. Specifically, the LAC1 gene explained 18% of the total melanin variance at 30 °C, 30% at 37 °C, 13% in low oxidative stress, 21% in intermediate oxidative stress, 23% in high oxidative stress, 23% in low nitrosative stress, 27% in intermediate nitrosative stress, and 22% in high nitrosative stress (Table 3). The contributions of the MAT locus to melanin variation were assessed for all three environmental conditions in which it was significantly correlated with melanin levels. Specifically, MAT explained 11% of the total melanin variance in thermal stress, 4.4% in low oxidative stress and 4.8% in high oxidative stress.
Figure 6

Percent Contribution of genetic factors, environmental factors and genotype-environment interactions to melanin variance. Results of two-way ANOVAs revealed the % variance of melanin production within thermal, oxidative and nitrosative stress environments explained by genetic differences between strains, environmental factors and genotype-environment interactions.

Table 3

Percent melanin variance explained by tested factors.

Tested factors% Melanin variance explained by tested factors in different stress conditions
Thermal stressOxidative stressNitrosative stress
30 °C37 °CLowIntermediateHighLowIntermediateHigh
Genetic factors55.5251.2158.84
LAC1 17.7629.8313.0821.1223.1722.8526.7422.12
MAT 29.834.434.85
Environmental factors15.434.7111.19
Genotype-environment interactions28.1242.929.12

The % melanin variance explained by genetic factors, environmental factors, genotype-environment interactions, LAC1 gene and the mating type-determining locus (MAT) was determined through two-factor and one-factor ANOVAs, and are summarized in this table. In all three types of stress, genetic factors explained the most variance followed by genotype-environment interactions and environmental factors.

Percent Contribution of genetic factors, environmental factors and genotype-environment interactions to melanin variance. Results of two-way ANOVAs revealed the % variance of melanin production within thermal, oxidative and nitrosative stress environments explained by genetic differences between strains, environmental factors and genotype-environment interactions. Percent melanin variance explained by tested factors. The % melanin variance explained by genetic factors, environmental factors, genotype-environment interactions, LAC1 gene and the mating type-determining locus (MAT) was determined through two-factor and one-factor ANOVAs, and are summarized in this table. In all three types of stress, genetic factors explained the most variance followed by genotype-environment interactions and environmental factors.

Discussion

Melanin production is a major virulence factor of the CNSC that contributes to its pathogenicity. While it has been shown that eliminating melanin synthesis makes CNSC strains avirulent, little is known about quantitative variation in melanin production that exists within natural populations of CNSC. Factors contributing to this phenotypic variance remain largely unexplored and elucidating these factors will shed light on evolution and regulation of melanin biosynthesis in CNSC. Our results showed that extensive variation in level of melanisation exists between strains of C. neoformans var. neoformans. In addition, both genetic factors as well as genotype-environment interactions explain a significant degree of this observed variance in melanin production. The previous QTL study identified five genomic regions that together explained 49% of the melanin variance observed among progeny strains derived from a hybrid cross between strains of C. neoformans var. grubii and C. neoformans var. neoformans[25]. Apart from LAC1, the MLST loci sequenced in our study were not located within or near these genomic regions. While LAC1 was one of the markers identified in the QTL analysis, the MLST sequence only included a 473-bp fragment covering mostly an intronic region of the gene. Therefore, the lack of association between MLST genotypes and melanin levels in our study is not unexpected. While CAP59, GPD1, IGS1, PLB1, SOD1 and URA5 genes perform important functions within the cryptococcal cell, our results suggest that polymorphisms at these loci do not contribute to variation in melanin production among CND strains. The previous QTL study determined that LAC1 explained ~10% of the melanin variance observed at 30 °C, which is lower than our estimate of 18%. This discrepancy could be attributed to a couple of factors. First, due to their historical divergence[28], there might be more loci involved in melanin variation between the two varieties than within CND, diminishing the contribution of LAC1 to the overall variance in the hybrid cross. Second, while there are only two alleles at the LAC1 locus in the hybrid progeny population, a total of 21 alleles were found in our CND sample of 54 isolates. This higher allelic variation at the LAC1 locus could explain the higher contribution of LAC1 to the total melanin variation among our study population compared to the lab-derived progeny population from a hybrid cross of the previous study. Regardless, we would like to emphasize that the three LAC1 SNPs identified here as being associated with melanin variations were only statistically suggested correlations on how genetic polymorphisms at LAC1 might be related to phenotypic diversity. Targeted (i.e. site-directed) mutagenesis and/or allele-swap experiments are needed in order to determine the causal effects of individual SNPs or alleles on melanin production in different environmental conditions. Our analyses identified genotype-environment interactions as a significant contributor to melanin variance between strains of C. neoformans var. neoformans. Dual-use virulence hypothesis proposes that the virulence factors of CNSC, including melanin biosynthesis, evolved primarily as a response to environmental stress, and not to host conditions[22]. If true, this suggests that strains originating from different climatic zones should have differential expression of the virulence factors consistent with the environmental conditions to which they were exposed in their natural habitats. Our findings are consistent with this hypothesis, as the presence of genotype-environment interactions indicate the evolution of genotypes best suited to their environments of origin. This is further highlighted by the increasingly higher contribution of LAC1 to melanin variance in higher levels of thermal and oxidative stress which points to a complex interaction between LAC1 and environmental stress. Melanised cryptococcal cells have shown to be more resistant to temperature extremes and oxidative stress[21,29]. However, in our study population, melanin production was significantly repressed in both thermal and oxidative stress after 3-days’ growth when melanin measurements were taken. Laccase activity was previously found to be severely inhibited at 37 °C[30], which is consistent with melanin production being repressed at this temperature. We observed that strains gradually became more pigmented over the next several days. This result suggests that melanin production may not be an important component of cryptococcal cells’ initial response to thermal stress or oxidative stress encountered during the early stages of an infection, but it likely plays an important role later on. Taken together, our results suggest that melanin pigments may contribute more to the persistence of a cryptococcal infection, rather than to its initial establishment. Nitrosative stress caused by RNS is believed to act in a very similar manner to oxidative stress in exerting its microbicidal effects[31]. However, our findings suggest that melanin biosynthesis in C. neoformans var. neoformans is regulated differently in response to nitrosative stress as compared to oxidative stress. Melanin production seems to be induced in the presence of a moderate concentration of RNS in the environment. A potential mechanism that mediates this response can be found in an in vitro study conducted by Matuszak and colleagues where they reported that the concentration of synthetic DOPA-melanin pigments in an acidic buffer increased four-fold in the presence of 0.5 mM NaNO2 whereas the presence of H2O2 in the medium did not produce the same effect[32]. They proposed that the interaction of DOPA-melanin with nitrite at acidic pH leads to melanin oxidation, followed by the generation of a large number of melanin radicals. To the best of our knowledge, our finding is the first report of an in vivo system where an intermediate level of NaNO2 (0.5 mM) upregulated melanin biosynthesis. Furthermore, we found that this fine-tuned melanin response to RNS was mediated through differential LAC1 expression. How nitrosative stress levels are perceived by cryptococcal cells to regulate melanin biosynthesis remains to be examined. In conclusion, our findings indicate the presence of extensive intra-varietal variation in melanisation in the C. neoformans species complex, while highlighting the contribution of genetic factors, as well as genotype-environment interactions to the observed variance. Our results indicate that melanin production in CNSC is influenced by multiple factors and its biosynthesis is sensitive to and highly regulated by different environmental factors. Further research is needed to fully elucidate the identity of these factors and how they shape melanin production in response to stressors in its natural as well as host environments.

Materials and Methods

Strains

A total of 54 strains of Cryptococcus neoformans var. neoformans (serotype D) were analyzed in this study, including two lab strains (JEC20 and JEC21) and 52 natural strains (Table 1). Among these 52 natural strains, 14 were from the United States, 11 from Italy, 9 from Denmark, 6 from Greece, 4 from Belgium, 4 from Germany, 2 from Canada, 1 from Japan and 1 from Turkey. Twenty-four of the natural strains were isolated from the environment, 25 from human cryptococcal infections and 3 from veterinary sources. We confirm all 25 clinical strains analyzed here were obtained following the respective institutional and national guidelines where informed consent was given to individual patients and that most of these strains have already been reported in previous publications[19,28,33]. Among the 52 natural strains, 15 strains were of the mating type ‘a’ (MATa) and 37 were of mating type ‘alpha’ (MATα). The common laboratory strains JEC20 (MATa) and JEC21 (MATα), both of serotype D, were included in the population as reference strains.

Melanin quantification

Melanin production was quantified using a spot densitometry assay on caffeic acid-containing solid agar medium as described previously[25]. Caffeic acid is a structural analog of L-DOPA and previous studies have shown that C. neoformans uses these two substrates interchangeably to synthesize melanin[24,34]. Briefly, for our assay, the stock cultures maintained at −80 °C were first revived on solid YEPD medium and grown for 2–3 days at 30 °C. Yeast cells from freshly grown cultures were suspended in sterile water and the cell density was adjusted to 1 × 106 cells/ml using the hemocytometer cell counter. A 5 µl drop of this solution was spotted onto the caffeic-acid agar[35]. The plates containing the spots were then incubated in one of eight different environmental conditions for 72 hours, after which measurements were taken. As the negative control, melanin production was quantified at 30 °C, the optimum growth temperature of C. neoformans, with no added stressors in the medium. To create thermal stress, plates were incubated at 37 °C. To create oxidative stress, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) was added to the caffeic acid agar in one of three concentrations (0.25 mM, 0.5 mM and 1 mM). To create nitrosative stress, sodium nitrite salt (NaNO2) was added to the caffeic acid agar in one of three concentrations (0.25 mM, 0.5 mM and 1 mM). Following the 72-hour incubation period, a transilluminator was used to expose the resulting colonies to reflective white light, and the amount of light reflected from the surface of the colonies was quantified using the spot densitometry function of the Alpha-Imager (InnovTech). The light is reflected according to the degree of colony darkness: the darker colonies that produced more melanin reflect less light. For each strain at each incubation condition, at least 4 replicate spots were assayed. Each experiment was repeated three times.

RNA extraction and RT-qPCR

The level of LAC1 mRNA expression in the presence of nitrosative stress was tested using reverse transcriptase-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) in two representative strains, Y290-90 (clinical strain from Canada) and GRAKI13HO1-1 (environmental strain from Greece). These two strains were chosen because they had different melanin levels and showed different responses to nitrosative stresses. For each strain, cells were grown on caffeic acid medium with low, intermediate and high nitrosative stress as described above. After 4-days’ growth, cells were scraped off the solid medium and suspended in 1 mL sterile water and pelleted by centrifugation at 13,000 g for 2 minutes. The cell pellets were frozen in −80 °C and lyophilized overnight. The lyophilized pellets were resuspended in TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen) and vortexed with glass beads (<1 mm) for 5 minutes. Total RNA was then extracted using TRIzol according to manufacturer’s instructions. Quantification of LAC1 mRNA in the samples was achieved through RT-qPCR using Luna Universal One-Step RT-qPCR kit (NEB). LAC1 primers spanning exon-exon junctions were used in qPCR to ensure exclusive amplification of mRNA. Actin 1, a single-copy housekeeping gene, was used as the reference to calibrate the relative expression levels between strains and among treatments for comparison. qPCR primers are listed in Table S1.

Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) analysis

MLST was performed on all 54 strains according to the ISHAM consensus scheme[26] and all novel sequences were deposited in the Cryptococcus neoformans MLST database. Data for the strains GRLMM26HO1-2, ITMPV22BK7-1, IUM 01-4729, IUM 01-4730, IUM 97-4899, IUM 98-2742, IUM 98-5036, NIH-430, PD32, TRNCGB1H01-1, NIH-433, NIH-424, IUM 02-0826, IUM 02-4295, IUM 93-1656, M9112, GRACA18BK1-3, GRACP15SO1-2, GRACP30BK1-1, GRAKI13HO1-1, GRAKI28HO1-1, IUM 01-0956, IUM 77-0033, IUM 79-0801, NIH-116, RKI 13-0490, RKI 13-0491, RKI 13-0492, PD1596, IUM 98-4987 were obtained from a previous study[33].

Sequencing of the LAC1 gene

To obtain the nucleotide sequence of the LAC1 gene (2886 bps) and its promoter (up to 2240 bps upstream of the transcription start site), we designed 6 primer pairs based on the fully sequenced genome of JEC21, available on NCBI (Accession number NC_006692.1, range 353455 to 357328 - reverse complement). Primers were designed to ensure sufficient overlap between the resulting fragments for accurate alignment and assembly. The primer sequences and their annealing temperatures are listed in Table S1 in Supplementary Information. Each fragment was PCR amplified and sequenced using Sanger method. All LAC1 sequences were deposited into NCBI GenBank and their accession numbers are listed in Table 2. The software CLC Sequence Viewer 7.8.1 was used to combine the fragments to obtain the complete LAC1 sequence for each strain. The “adegenet” package[36] in R-studio was used to extract polymorphic sites from the aligned LAC1 sequences of the population. Only those polymorphisms that were present at a Minor Allele Frequency (MAF) of or greater than 10% were included in downstream statistical analyses.

Statistical Analysis

All statistical analyses were carried out using the R-Studio software and associated packages. One-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was conducted to compare the average melanin production of the population between the 8 tested environmental conditions. Within each condition, student’s t-tests were conducted to compare average melanin production by source of isolation (clinical vs. environmental) and mating type (MATa vs. MATα). Within the conditions where the average melanin production was determined to be significantly different between the two mating types, one-way ANOVA was used to determine the percentage of melanin variance explained by the MAT locus. To partition melanin variance within each of the 3 types of stress (thermal, oxidative and nitrosative stress) into genotype effects, environmental effects and genotype-environment interaction effects, we conducted two-way ANOVAs with the first factor being the strain (we assumed each strain to be genetically unique from the rest of the population) and second factor being different levels of the stress. For each of the 8 tested conditions (i.e. different levels of thermal stress, oxidative stress and nitrosative stress), we used one-way ANOVA to determine if average melanin production significantly differed between LAC1 haplotypes and to estimate the percentage of population’s melanin variance explained by the LAC1 locus.

Data availability

All data described in the study are presented in the manuscript. The new DNA sequences obtained and described in this study have been deposited in the Cryptococcus neoformans multilocus sequence typing database (http://mlst.mycologylab.org) and GenBank (accession numbers MG963844 to MG963895, Table 2).

Statements on study approvals

We confirm that all methods in this study were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations at McMaster University. In addition, all experimental protocols were approved by the President’s Biosafety Advisory Committee at McMaster University. Supplementary information
  34 in total

1.  Melanization affects susceptibility of Cryptococcus neoformans to heat and cold.

Authors:  A L Rosas; A Casadevall
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  1997-08-15       Impact factor: 2.742

2.  Multiple gene genealogies reveal recent dispersion and hybridization in the human pathogenic fungus Cryptococcus neoformans.

Authors:  J Xu; R Vilgalys; T G Mitchell
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 6.185

3.  The yeast Cryptococcus neoformans uses 'mammalian' enhancer sites in the regulation of the virulence gene, CNLAC1.

Authors:  S Zhang; A Varma; P R Williamson
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1999-02-18       Impact factor: 3.688

4.  Caffeic acid-containing medium for identification of Cryptococcus neoformans.

Authors:  R L Hopfer; F Blank
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1976-08       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Pathogenesis of pulmonary Cryptococcus neoformans infection in the rat.

Authors:  D Goldman; S C Lee; A Casadevall
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 3.441

6.  Multilocus sequence typing analysis reveals that Cryptococcus neoformans var. neoformans is a recombinant population.

Authors:  Massimo Cogliati; Alberto Zani; Volker Rickerts; Ilka McCormick; Marie Desnos-Ollivier; Aristea Velegraki; Patricia Escandon; Tomoe Ichikawa; Reiko Ikeda; Anne-Lise Bienvenu; Kathrin Tintelnot; Okan Tore; Sevim Akcaglar; Shawn Lockhart; Anna Maria Tortorano; Ashok Varma
Journal:  Fungal Genet Biol       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 3.495

7.  Susceptibility of melanized and nonmelanized Cryptococcus neoformans to nitrogen- and oxygen-derived oxidants.

Authors:  Y Wang; A Casadevall
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 3.441

Review 8.  Cryptococcus neoformans infection in organ transplant recipients: variables influencing clinical characteristics and outcome.

Authors:  S Husain; M M Wagener; N Singh
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.883

9.  Cell-to-cell spread and massive vacuole formation after Cryptococcus neoformans infection of murine macrophages.

Authors:  Mauricio Alvarez; Arturo Casadevall
Journal:  BMC Immunol       Date:  2007-08-16       Impact factor: 3.615

10.  Identification of QTLs Associated with Virulence Related Traits and Drug Resistance in Cryptococcus neoformans.

Authors:  Aaron A Vogan; Jordan Khankhet; Himeshi Samarasinghe; Jianping Xu
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 3.154

View more
  7 in total

1.  Horse: a potential source of Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii in Egypt.

Authors:  Rahma Mohammed; Sara M Nader; Dalia A Hamza; Maha A Sabry
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 2.741

2.  Phenotypic Plasticity in the Productions of Virulence Factors Within and Among Serotypes in the Cryptococcus neoformans Species Complex.

Authors:  Yajur Iyengar; Jianping Xu
Journal:  Mycopathologia       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 2.574

3.  Pleiotropy and epistasis within and between signaling pathways defines the genetic architecture of fungal virulence.

Authors:  Cullen Roth; Debra Murray; Alexandria Scott; Ci Fu; Anna F Averette; Sheng Sun; Joseph Heitman; Paul M Magwene
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 5.917

4.  The first survey of cryptococcal cells in bird droppings across Bloemfontein, South Africa.

Authors:  Gloria Kankam; Byron Christians; Maphori Maliehe; Nozethu Mjokane; Adepemi O Ogundeji; Olufemi S Folorunso; Carolina H Pohl; Olihile M Sebolai
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2021-10-25

5.  Faster Cryptococcus Melanization Increases Virulence in Experimental and Human Cryptococcosis.

Authors:  Herdson Renney de Sousa; Getúlio Pereira de Oliveira; Stefânia de Oliveira Frazão; Kaio César de Melo Gorgonha; Camila Pereira Rosa; Emãnuella Melgaço Garcez; Joaquim Lucas; Amabel Fernandes Correia; Waleriano Ferreira de Freitas; Higor Matos Borges; Lucas Gomes de Brito Alves; Hugo Costa Paes; Luciana Trilles; Márcia Dos Santos Lazera; Marcus de Melo Teixeira; Vitor Laerte Pinto; Maria Sueli Soares Felipe; Arturo Casadevall; Ildinete Silva-Pereira; Patrícia Albuquerque; André Moraes Nicola
Journal:  J Fungi (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-12

Review 6.  The Environmental Effects on Virulence Factors and the Antifungal Susceptibility of Cryptococcus neoformans.

Authors:  Mahek Momin; Ginny Webb
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Population diversity and virulence characteristics of Cryptococcus neoformans/C. gattii species complexes isolated during the pre-HIV-pandemic era.

Authors:  Sujiraphong Pharkjaksu; Kyung J Kwon-Chung; John E Bennett; Popchai Ngamskulrungroj
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2020-10-05
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.