Literature DB >> 29959285

Training for Medical Oncologists on Shared Decision-Making About Palliative Chemotherapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Inge Henselmans1,2,3, Hanneke W M van Laarhoven4,3, Hanneke C J M de Haes5, Meltem Tokat5, Ellen G Engelhardt2,6, Pomme E A van Maarschalkerweerd5, Marleen Kunneman5,7, Petronella B Ottevanger8, Serge E Dohmen9, Geert-Jan Creemers10, Dirkje W Sommeijer4,11, Filip Y F L de Vos12, Ellen M A Smets5,2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Systemic treatment for advanced cancer offers uncertain and sometimes limited benefit, while the burden can be high. This study examines the effect of shared decision-making (SDM) training for medical oncologists on observed SDM in standardized patient assessments.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized controlled trial comparing training with standard practice was conducted. Medical oncologists and oncologists-in-training (n = 31) participated in a video-recorded, standardized patient assessment at baseline (T0) and after 4 months (T1, after training). The training was based on a four-stage SDM model and consisted of a reader, two group sessions (3.5 hours each), a booster session (1.5 hours), and a consultation card. The primary outcome was observed SDM as assessed with the Observing Patient Involvement scale (OPTION12) coded by observers blinded for arm. Secondary outcomes were observed SDM per stage, communication skills, and oncologists' satisfaction with communication.
RESULTS: The training had a significant and large effect on observed SDM in the simulated consultations (Cohen's f = 0.62) and improved observed SDM behavior in all four SDM stages (f = 0.39-0.72). The training improved oncologists' information provision skills (f = 0.77), skills related to anticipating/responding to emotions (f = 0.42), and their satisfaction with the consultation (f = 0.53).
CONCLUSION: Training medical oncologists in SDM about palliative systemic treatment improves their performance in simulated consultations. The next step is to examine the effect of such training on SDM in clinical practice and on patient outcomes. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Systemic treatment for advanced cancer offers uncertain and sometimes limited benefit, while the burden can be high. Hence, applying the premises of shared decision-making (SDM) is recommended. SDM is increasingly advocated based on the ethical imperative to provide patient-centered care and the increasing evidence for beneficial patient outcomes. Few studies examined the effectiveness of SDM training in robust designs. This randomized controlled trial demonstrated that SDM training (10 hours) improves oncologists' performance in consultations with standardized patients. The next step is to examine the effect of training on oncologists' performance and patient outcomes in clinical practice. © AlphaMed Press 2018.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Communication; Medical oncology; Palliative care; Physician‐patient relations; Shared decision‐making

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29959285      PMCID: PMC6369949          DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  36 in total

1.  Predictors of physicians' communication performance in a decision-making encounter with a simulated advanced-stage cancer patient: A longitudinal study.

Authors:  Yves Libert; Delphine Canivet; Catherine Ménard; Laëtitia Van Achte; Christine Farvacques; Isabelle Merckaert; Aurore Liénard; Jean Klastersky; Christine Reynaert; Jean-Louis Slachmuylder; Jean-François Durieux; Nicole Delvaux; Darius Razavi
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2017-03-04

2.  Using a 'talk' model of shared decision making to propose an observation-based measure: Observer OPTION 5 Item.

Authors:  Glyn Elwyn; Maka Tsulukidze; Adrian Edwards; France Légaré; Robert Newcombe
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2013-08-27

Review 3.  Training health professionals in shared decision making: Update of an international environmental scan.

Authors:  Ndeye Thiab Diouf; Matthew Menear; Hubert Robitaille; Geneviève Painchaud Guérard; France Légaré
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2016-06-14

Review 4.  Shared decision making: developing the OPTION scale for measuring patient involvement.

Authors:  G Elwyn; A Edwards; M Wensing; K Hood; C Atwell; R Grol
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2003-04

5.  Shared decision making: prostate cancer patients' appraisal of treatment alternatives and oncologists' eliciting and responding behavior, an explorative study.

Authors:  Arwen H Pieterse; Inge Henselmans; Hanneke C J M de Haes; Caro C E Koning; Elisabeth D Geijsen; Ellen M A Smets
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2011-06-11

6.  Do radiation oncologists tailor information to patients needs? And, if so, does it affect patients?

Authors:  Kirsten F L Douma; Caro C E Koning; Hanneke C J M de Haes; Linda C Zandbelt; Lukas J A Stalpers; Ellen M A Smets
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 4.089

Review 7.  Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.

Authors:  Dawn Stacey; Carol L Bennett; Michael J Barry; Nananda F Col; Karen B Eden; Margaret Holmes-Rovner; Hilary Llewellyn-Thomas; Anne Lyddiatt; France Légaré; Richard Thomson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-10-05

8.  Communication and information: the experience of radiotherapy patients.

Authors:  K Gamble
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.520

9.  Shared decision making: Concepts, evidence, and practice.

Authors:  A M Stiggelbout; A H Pieterse; J C J M De Haes
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2015-07-15

Review 10.  Patient centered decision making in palliative cancer treatment: a world of paradoxes.

Authors:  Hanneke de Haes; Nelleke Koedoot
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2003-05
View more
  12 in total

1.  Effect of a Skills Training for Oncologists and a Patient Communication Aid on Shared Decision Making About Palliative Systemic Treatment: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Inge Henselmans; Hanneke W M van Laarhoven; Pomme van Maarschalkerweerd; Hanneke C J M de Haes; Marcel G W Dijkgraaf; Dirkje W Sommeijer; Petronella B Ottevanger; Helle-Brit Fiebrich; Serge Dohmen; Geert-Jan Creemers; Filip Y F L de Vos; Ellen M A Smets
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-11-26

2.  Effect of a Skills Training for Oncologists and a Patient Communication Aid on Shared Decision Making About Palliative Systemic Treatment: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Inge Henselmans; Hanneke W M van Laarhoven; Pomme van Maarschalkerweerd; Hanneke C J M de Haes; Marcel G W Dijkgraaf; Dirkje W Sommeijer; Petronella B Ottevanger; Helle-Brit Fiebrich; Serge Dohmen; Geert-Jan Creemers; Filip Y F L de Vos; Ellen M A Smets
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-11-26

3.  Do Shared Decision-Making Measures Reflect Key Elements of Shared Decision Making? A Content Review of Coding Schemes.

Authors:  Marleen Kunneman; Inge Henselmans; Fania R Gärtner; Hanna Bomhof-Roordink; Arwen H Pieterse
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 4.  Concerns and potential improvements in end-of-life care from the perspectives of older patients and informal caregivers: a scoping review.

Authors:  Mina Motamedi; Caitlin Brandenburg; Mina Bakhit; Zoe A Michaleff; Loai Albarqouni; Justin Clark; Meidelynn Ooi; Danial Bahudin; Danielle Ní Chróinín; Magnolia Cardona
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 3.921

5.  'A basic understanding'; evaluation of a blended training programme for healthcare providers in hospital-based palliative care to improve communication with patients with limited health literacy.

Authors:  Janneke Noordman; Ruud Roodbeen; Leonie Gach; Lotte Schulze; Jany Rademakers; Maria van den Muijsenbergh; Gudule Boland; Sandra van Dulmen
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 3.263

6.  Addressing palliative care and end-of-life issues in patients with advanced cancer: a systematic review of communication interventions for physicians not specialised in palliative care.

Authors:  Nele Harnischfeger; Hilke M Rath; Karin Oechsle; Corinna Bergelt
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 3.006

7.  Effect of a multilevel implementation programme on shared decision-making in breast cancer care.

Authors:  H van Veenendaal; H Voogdt-Pruis; D T Ubbink; C G J M Hilders
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2021-03-05

8.  Shared Decision Making in Practice and the Perspectives of Health Care Professionals on Video-Recorded Consultations With Patients With Low Health Literacy in the Palliative Phase of Their Disease.

Authors:  Ruud T J Roodbeen; Janneke Noordman; Gudule Boland; Sandra van Dulmen
Journal:  MDM Policy Pract       Date:  2021-07-02

9.  Shared decision making in cancer treatment: A Dutch national survey on patients' preferences and perceptions.

Authors:  Marieke M T Kuijpers; Haske van Veenendaal; Vivian Engelen; Ella Visserman; Eveline A Noteboom; Anne M Stiggelbout; Anne M May; Niek de Wit; Elsken van der Wall; Charles W Helsper
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 2.328

10.  The role of hospital nurses in shared decision-making about life-prolonging treatment: A qualitative interview study.

Authors:  Danique W Bos-van den Hoek; Maureen Thodé; Irene P Jongerden; Hanneke W M Van Laarhoven; Ellen M A Smets; Dorien Tange; Inge Henselmans; H Roeline Pasman
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 3.057

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.