| Literature DB >> 29959183 |
Antonia Puchner1, Victoria Saferding1, Michael Bonelli1, Yohei Mikami2, Melanie Hofmann1, Julia S Brunner1, Michael Caldera3, Eliana Goncalves-Alves1, Nikolaus B Binder1, Anita Fischer1, Elisabeth Simader1, Carl-Walter Steiner1, Harald Leiss1, Silvia Hayer1, Birgit Niederreiter1, Thomas Karonitsch1, Marije I Koenders4, Bruno K Podesser5, John J O'Shea2, Jörg Menche3, Josef S Smolen1, Kurt Redlich1, Stephan Blüml1,6.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Bone destruction in rheumatoid arthritis is mediated by osteoclasts (OC), which are derived from precursor cells of the myeloid lineage. The role of the two monocyte subsets, classical monocytes (expressing CD115, Ly6C and CCR2) and non-classical monocytes (which are CD115 positive, but low in Ly6C and CCR2), in serving as precursors for OC in arthritis is still elusive.Entities:
Keywords: arthritis; cytokines; inflammation; synovitis; tnf-alpha
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29959183 PMCID: PMC6161666 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-213250
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Rheum Dis ISSN: 0003-4967 Impact factor: 19.103
Figure 1hTNFtg/CCR2deficient mice showed enhanced local bone destruction and osteoclast formation. CCR2−/− mice were crossed into hTNFtg mice and histological analysis was performed. (A) Quantitative analysis of histological parameters of arthritis (hTNFtg, n=5; hTNFtg/CCR2−/−, n=9)). Results are shown as mean±SEM (B) Representative histological sections of the hind paws of hTNFtg/CCR2+/+ and hTNFtg/CCR2−/− mice stained with H&E and TRAP. Osteoclasts are displayed as purple-stained cells. *P<0.05. (C), Analysis of the percentage of Ly6C+ cells (left panel), CD115+ cells (middle panel) and Gr1+ cells (right panel) shown as per cent of total cells in the synovial membrane of hTNFtg/CCR2+/+ and hTNFtg/CCR2−/− mice. TRAP, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase.
Figure 2Monocytes in blood and spleen in hTNFtg arthritis. (A) Gating of flow cytometric analysis of myeloid populations in blood obtained from WT and hTNFtg mice. (B,C) Bar graph summarising frequencies of myeloid populations in blood (B) and spleen (C) of WT mice and hTNFtg mice (n=at least 10 per group). Results are shown as mean±SEM. **P<0.01; ***P<0.001. WT, wild type.
Figure 3Development of arthritis is accompanied by accumulation of circulating mononuclear cells. (A) Clinical assessment of paw swelling and grip strength in WT mice (n=10) and hTNFtg mice (n=9). (B) Characterisation of monocytes under steady-state conditions and during hTNF driven arthritis. Blood from WT mice and hTNFtg were analysed using flow cytometric analysis over time (n=at least 12 per group and time point). Results are shown as mean±SEM. *P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001. WT, wild type.
Figure 4Characterisation of monocytes during hTNF driven arthritis. The number of circulating non-classical monocytes (A) and classical monocytes (B) was correlated with histological markers of joint destruction such as the number of osteoclasts, the area of erosion and inflammation. (C) H&E staining of a hind paw of a hTNFtg mouse (scale bars=1 mm) and immunohistochemical staining for monocyte markers CD115 and Ly6C in an erosion (scale bars=50 µm). Arrows indicate CD115 positive osteoclasts.
Figure 5Identification of cell populations with osteoclastogenic potential from peripheral blood cells. (A) In vitro OC assay of sorted Ly6C+ classical and Ly6C– non-classical monocytes of WT and hTNFtg mice stimulated with MCSF (4d) and RANKL (3d). Graph shows the number of TRAP positive multinucleated cells (data shown are mean values of five independent experiments±SEM). (B) Volcano plot representation of differential expression analysis of genes in RNA sequencing of WT Ly6C+ classical vs Ly6C– non-classical monocytes after stimulation with MCSF (4d) and RANKL (1d) (n=3 each). The x-axis shows log2 FC in expression, the negative log10 of the p value is plotted on the y-axis. Each gene is represented by one point on the graph. (C) Number of differentially regulated genes (FC≥2, p≤0.05) in RNA sequencing in Ly6C+ classical vs Ly6C– non-classical monocytes. (D) GO enrichment analysis of the transcriptome of Ly6C+ classical vs Ly6C– non-classical monocytes: x-axis shows FC of significantly enriched GO terms in differentially regulated genes in RNA-sequencing of Ly6C+ classical vs Ly6C– non-classical monocytes. The number in the columns represents the –log10 p value of the indicated GO term. **P<0.01; ***P<0.001. FC, fold change; GO, Gene Ontology; OC, osteoclasts; TRAP, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase; WT, wild type.
Figure 6Increased expression of RANK-associated signal transduction molecules in non-classical monocytes. (A) Expression levels (FPKM values) of Gab2 and TRAF6 in RNA sequencing dataset of sorted Ly6C+ classical and Ly6C– non-classical monocytes stimulated with MCSF (4d) and RANKL (1d) (n=3 each). Results are shown as mean±SEM (B) Western blot for the presence of TRAF6 in Ly6C+ classical and Ly6C– non-classical monocytes after stimulation with MCSF for 3 days. Actin was used for loading control. Results are representative of three independent experiments. (C) Heat map of osteoclast-related genes of RNA sequencing of classical vs non-classical monocytes stimulated with MCSF (4d) and RANKL (1d) (n=3 each). (D) Western blot for the presence of DC-STAMP in Ly6C+ classical and Ly6C– non-classical monocytes after stimulation with MCSF (4d) and RANKL (1d). (E) Quantification of nuclei/OC of classical and non-classical monocytes derived OCs. Results are shown as mean±SEM. (F) Representative pictures of TRAP staining to detect OCs generated from classical and non-classical monocytes. *P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001. OCs, osteoclasts; TRAP, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase.