Ruhong Wu1, Huaping Qin1, Zhonghai Cai1, Jia Shi1, Jiachao Cao1, Yumin Mao1, Bo Dong2. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou City, China. 2. Department of Neurosurgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou City, China. Electronic address: db197805@163.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical efficacy of navigation-guided minimally invasive surgery in patients with hypertensive basal ganglia hemorrhage. METHODS: A total of 64 patients with hypertensive basal ganglia hemorrhage were enrolled in this retrospective study. They were divided into a navigation group and a traditional group based on surgical approaches. The data for the 2 groups of patients were analyzed with regard for the hematoma clearance rate, duration of surgery, duration of hospitalization, Glasgow Outcome Scale score at discharge, Barthel index score at 6 months, and postoperative complication rates for rebleeding and pneumonia. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in basic characteristics between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). The hematoma clearance rate was significantly lower in the navigation group (49.18 ± 16.76%) than in the traditional group (84.29 ± 6.91%, P < 0.01). The duration of surgery and duration of hospitalization were significantly shorter in the navigation group (55.00 ± 11.89 minutes and 24.25 ± 7.1 days, respectively) than in the traditional group (156.38 ± 47.9 minutes and 32.63 ± 9.8 days, respectively; both P < 0.01). There were also significant differences between the 2 groups in Glasgow Outcome Scale scores (P = 0.006). The Barthel index scores were significantly greater in the navigation group (73.13 ± 18.76) than in the traditional group (57.63 ± 26.63, P < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in the complication rates (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Under certain conditions, compared with standard craniotomy and hematoma evacuation, navigation-guided hematoma puncture aspiration and catheter drainage is simple, effective, and safe as a treatment for hypertensive basal ganglia hemorrhage.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical efficacy of navigation-guided minimally invasive surgery in patients with hypertensive basal ganglia hemorrhage. METHODS: A total of 64 patients with hypertensive basal ganglia hemorrhage were enrolled in this retrospective study. They were divided into a navigation group and a traditional group based on surgical approaches. The data for the 2 groups of patients were analyzed with regard for the hematoma clearance rate, duration of surgery, duration of hospitalization, Glasgow Outcome Scale score at discharge, Barthel index score at 6 months, and postoperative complication rates for rebleeding and pneumonia. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in basic characteristics between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). The hematoma clearance rate was significantly lower in the navigation group (49.18 ± 16.76%) than in the traditional group (84.29 ± 6.91%, P < 0.01). The duration of surgery and duration of hospitalization were significantly shorter in the navigation group (55.00 ± 11.89 minutes and 24.25 ± 7.1 days, respectively) than in the traditional group (156.38 ± 47.9 minutes and 32.63 ± 9.8 days, respectively; both P < 0.01). There were also significant differences between the 2 groups in Glasgow Outcome Scale scores (P = 0.006). The Barthel index scores were significantly greater in the navigation group (73.13 ± 18.76) than in the traditional group (57.63 ± 26.63, P < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in the complication rates (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Under certain conditions, compared with standard craniotomy and hematoma evacuation, navigation-guided hematoma puncture aspiration and catheter drainage is simple, effective, and safe as a treatment for hypertensive basal ganglia hemorrhage.