Literature DB >> 29958940

CiPA challenges and opportunities from a non-clinical, clinical and regulatory perspectives. An overview of the safety pharmacology scientific discussion.

Rob Wallis1, Charles Benson2, Borje Darpo3, Gary Gintant4, Yasunari Kanda5, Krishna Prasad6, David G Strauss7, Jean-Pierre Valentin8.   

Abstract

The Safety Pharmacology Society organized a scientific session at its annual conference in 2017 to discuss the challenges and opportunities of the Comprehensive In-Vitro Proarrhythmia Assay (CiPA) paradigm. Our intention was to raise awareness of this initiative with its members and also to gauge the extent to which safety pharmacologists have incorporated the CiPA testing strategy within the pharmaceutical industry. CiPA offers many potential opportunities including 1) a focus on proarrhythmic risk (as opposed to QTc prolongation), 2) providing scientific rationale to support the continued development of compounds that may have a poor selectivity over hERG whilst also blocking other inward currents and 3) reducing the extent of ECG monitoring in clinical trials with a greater influence of the non-clinical studies. Such opportunities may speed drug development and reduce costs. However, there are also challenges for CiPA implementation. For example, the mixed ion channel paradigm does not easily lend itself to a prospective drug discovery strategy although testing for such effects can be achieved with assays with good throughput. However, it should also be recognized that compounds with a mixed ion channel profile might also have properties that are undesirable to treat non-life threatening indications. All components of CiPA (nonclinical and clinical) require validation, particularly as a composite package to impact drug development and evaluation. One of the significant discussion points was that the existing regulatory guidance supports the use of components of CiPA through follow-up studies. A survey of the conference audience showed that the level of awareness of CiPA is quite high and that companies are already conducting some testing against a wider panel of cardiac ion channels beyond hERG. However, the adoption of other technologies (stem cell derived cardiac myocytes and in silico modeling) is less well developed. Taken together, the session demonstrated the potential advantages of CiPA, but also some significant challenges.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CiPA; Comprehensive In-Vitro Proarrhythmia assay; Multiple cardiac ion channels; Proarrhythmia; QTc; Torsade de pointes; hERG

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29958940     DOI: 10.1016/j.vascn.2018.06.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods        ISSN: 1056-8719            Impact factor:   1.950


  8 in total

1.  Population-based toxicity screening in human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes.

Authors:  Sarah D Burnett; Alexander D Blanchette; Fabian A Grimm; John S House; David M Reif; Fred A Wright; Weihsueh A Chiu; Ivan Rusyn
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 4.219

2.  Cardiotoxicity Hazard and Risk Characterization of ToxCast Chemicals Using Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes from Multiple Donors.

Authors:  Sarah D Burnett; Alexander D Blanchette; Weihsueh A Chiu; Ivan Rusyn
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 3.739

3.  Assessing hERG1 Blockade from Bayesian Machine-Learning-Optimized Site Identification by Ligand Competitive Saturation Simulations.

Authors:  Mahdi Mousaei; Meruyert Kudaibergenova; Alexander D MacKerell; Sergei Noskov
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 4.956

4.  Thorough QT/QTc in a Dish: An In Vitro Human Model That Accurately Predicts Clinical Concentration-QTc Relationships.

Authors:  Alexander D Blanchette; Fabian A Grimm; Chimeddulam Dalaijamts; Nan-Hung Hsieh; Kyle Ferguson; Yu-Syuan Luo; Ivan Rusyn; Weihsueh A Chiu
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2018-12-02       Impact factor: 6.875

5.  Classifying Drugs by their Arrhythmogenic Risk Using Machine Learning.

Authors:  Francisco Sahli-Costabal; Kinya Seo; Euan Ashley; Ellen Kuhl
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 6.  Time for a Fully Integrated Nonclinical-Clinical Risk Assessment to Streamline QT Prolongation Liability Determinations: A Pharma Industry Perspective.

Authors:  Hugo M Vargas; Michael G Rolf; Todd A Wisialowski; William Achanzar; Anthony Bahinski; Alan Bass; Charles T Benson; Khuram W Chaudhary; Nicolas Couvreur; Corina Dota; Michael J Engwall; C Michael Foley; David Gallacher; Andrea Greiter-Wilke; Jean-Michel Guillon; Brian Guth; Herbert M Himmel; Christa Hegele-Hartung; Maki Ito; Stephen Jenkinson; Katsuyoshi Chiba; Armando Lagrutta; Paul Levesque; Eric Martel; Yoshiko Okai; Ravikumar Peri; Amy Pointon; Yusheng Qu; Ard Teisman; Martin Traebert; Takashi Yoshinaga; Gary A Gintant; Derek J Leishman; Jean-Pierre Valentin
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 7.  Stem Cell Studies in Cardiovascular Biology and Medicine: A Possible Key Role of Macrophages.

Authors:  Nanako Kawaguchi; Toshio Nakanishi
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-12

8.  Ion Channel Expression and Electrophysiology of Singular Human (Primary and Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived) Cardiomyocytes.

Authors:  Christina Schmid; Najah Abi-Gerges; Michael Georg Leitner; Dietmar Zellner; Georg Rast
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 6.600

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.