| Literature DB >> 29958694 |
Marc Ghannoum1, Robert S Hoffman2, Sophie Gosselin3, Thomas D Nolin4, Valery Lavergne5, Darren M Roberts6.
Abstract
Historically, the clinical application of extracorporeal treatments (ECTRs), such as hemodialysis or hemoperfusion, was first intended for poisoned patients. With time, ECTRs were used almost indiscriminately to facilitate the elimination of many poisons, albeit with uncertain clinical benefit. To determine the precise role of ECTRs in poisoning situations, multiple variables need to be considered including a careful risk assessment, the poison's characteristics including toxicokinetics, alternative treatments, the patient's clinical status, and intricacies of available ECTRs, all of which are reviewed in this article. Recently, evidence-based and expert opinion-based recommendations from the EXTRIP workgroup were also published to help minimize the knowledge gap in this area.Entities:
Keywords: continuous renal replacement therapy; hemodialysis; hemofiltration; pharmacokinetics; plasmapheresis
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29958694 DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2018.03.026
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Kidney Int ISSN: 0085-2538 Impact factor: 10.612