| Literature DB >> 29958534 |
Sandra Martins Pereira1,2,3, Joana Araújo4,5,6, Pablo Hernández-Marrero4,5,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Education sessions about palliative care among teenagers are uncommon in developed countries. However, very little is known either about the impact of this type of intervention or about how this age-group perceives its impact. The purpose of this study was therefore to (i) implement an education program about palliative care among teenagers and (ii) to investigate the impact of the program on the participants.Entities:
Keywords: Action research; Community-based intervention; Compassionate communities; Palliative care; Public health education; Public health policy; Teenagers
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29958534 PMCID: PMC6025723 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-018-0344-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Palliat Care ISSN: 1472-684X Impact factor: 3.234
Fig. 1The action-research spiral combining and integrating the techniques and instruments used for data collection
Integration of the education programme and research methods
| Education programme on palliative care for teenagers | Participants | Method for data collection | Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|
| Preparatory stage | Teenagers ( | Written sentences/ questions about palliative care | Thematic content analysis |
| Interviews | |||
| Reverend | Written testimony | ||
| Researcher-educator | Field notes | ||
| Intervention stage ‘Education Session’ | Teenagers (n = 48) | Education session materials (PPT) | Thematic content analysis |
| Interviews | |||
| Reverend | Written testimony | ||
| Researcher-educator | Field-notes | ||
| Evaluation stage | Teenagers (n = 48) | Questionnaire | Descriptive (%) |
| Interviews | Thematic content analysis | ||
| Reverend | Written testimony | ||
| Researcher-educator | Field-notes |
Note: Although the evaluation stage is described at the end of the process, it focused on all stages of the education programme
Themes and categories emerging from the preparatory stage
| Dimensions | Categories | Examples of text units |
|---|---|---|
| Definition of concepts | – | |
| Articulation | Palliative care versus curative care | |
| Care beneficiaries | – | |
| Care timings and timeframe | – | |
| Organization | – | |
| Directories | – | |
| Economic costs | – | |
| Philosophy, practice and meaning(s) | Philosophy and ethics | |
| Meaning(s) | ||
| Relevance and depth of questions | – | |
| Role of the community catechist | – |
WQS Written Questions/Sentences by teenagers. RFN Researcher Field Notes. WT Written Testimony
Themes and categories emerging from the education-intervention stage
| Categories | Examples of text units |
|---|---|
| Openness and positive attitude of the teenagers | |
| Teenagers’ high participation during the education-intervention session | |
| Positive feature of opening the session to the parents and local community |
RFN Researcher Field Notes. WT Written Testimony. I Interviewee
Evaluation rates of the education session
| Stage of the Education Program | Qualitative assessment | Scoring in the Likert Scale | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Organization of the overall education program | Very Good | 7 | 71% |
| 6 | 15% | ||
| 5 | 8% | ||
| 4 | 6% | ||
| 3 | 0% | ||
| 2 | 0% | ||
| Very Bad | 1 | 0% | |
| Total | – | 100% | |
| Preparatory stage | Very Good | 7 | 71% |
| 6 | 15% | ||
| 5 | 7% | ||
| 4 | 7% | ||
| 3 | 0% | ||
| 2 | 0% | ||
| Very Bad | 1 | 0% | |
| Total | – | 100% | |
| Education-intervention stage (session) | Very Good | 7 | 65% |
| 6 | 22% | ||
| 5 | 5% | ||
| 4 | 8% | ||
| 3 | 0% | ||
| 2 | 0% | ||
| Very Bad | 1 | 0% | |
| Total | – | 100% | |
| Evaluation stage (possibility to assess the education program) | Very Good | 7 | 71% |
| 6 | 22% | ||
| 5 | 6% | ||
| 4 | 1% | ||
| 3 | 0% | ||
| 2 | 0% | ||
| Very Bad | 1 | 0% | |
| Total | – | 100% |
Themes and categories emerging from the evaluation stage
| Dimensions | Categories | Examples of text units |
|---|---|---|
| Take-home messages | Moments of happiness | |
| Societal relevance | ||
| Additional comments | Excellent | |
| Exciting | ||
| Enlightening | ||
| Revolutionary | ||
| Thank you | ||
| Education session: |
AWT Answers written by teenagers. AWE Answers written by catechists. RFN Researcher Field Notes. WT Written Testimony. I Interviewee