| Literature DB >> 29958404 |
Li-Jun Liang1,2,3, Er-Huan Wang4, Yi-Chen Yang5, Bing-Cong Xing6,7, Wei Ji8, Feng Liu9, Zong-Suo Liang10,11,12,13.
Abstract
Codonopsis taxa, as a traditional Chinese medicinal and edible plant, has found expanding domestic and foreign applications in recent decades. However, the poor management in germplasm resources market has inevitably caused an unnecessary hybrid of the provenances. In order to clarify the hybrid characteristics of germplasm resources in the main production area, the Codonopsis cultivars collected from the provinces Gansu, Shannxi, Shanxi, and Hubei of China were researched, using internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequence technology. The confirmation of additive nucleotides based on the ITS sequencing of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) mixture was optimized and used to study the hybrid of Codonopsis cultivars. The results showed that when the ratio of PCR mixture increased up to 15 percent, the presence of a double peak in the sequencing electrophoresis map could be confirmed, suggesting the existence of additive nucleotides. According to the method above, 46 samples of Codonopsis cultivars collected during 2016 and 2017 were studied and compared with the samples collected from the year 2009 to 2010. All of the samples collected during 2016 and 2017 were hybridized and no genetic pure lines were found. In addition, the sites of variable base reduced greatly, concentrating at positions 122 and/or 226. These phenomena suggested that the genetic diversity of Codonopsis cultivars declined and the germplasm resources gradually converged. More attention should be paid to the reasonable exploitation and genetic breeding of Codonopsis taxa.Entities:
Keywords: Codonopsis taxa; ITS; additive nucleotide; hybrid
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29958404 PMCID: PMC6099391 DOI: 10.3390/molecules23071565
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
S-value of the additive peak at the 122nd Position and N-value of the high noise sites near the 122nd position in the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) gene (n = 5).
| pCT46 (%) | Main Signal | Significance | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | C | 11.54 ± 1.46 | 10.82 ± 0.98 | |
| 15 | C | 14.82 ± 1.16 | 10.64 ± 1.13 | ** |
| 20 | C | 21.08 ± 2.23 | 10.66 ± 1.07 | ** |
| 30 | C | 29.14 ± 1.65 | 8.92 ± 1.18 | ** |
| 40 | C | 39.60 ± 1.87 | 9.02 ± 1.19 | ** |
| 50 | C | 47.72 ± 1.37 | 8.84 ± 1.16 | ** |
indicates the percent of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products of sample CT46 to sample CP02. indicates the significance of difference between S-value and N-value. The S-value and N-value were equal to ‘Average ± S.D.’. The double asterisk indicates the difference analyzed between the S-value and N-value was very significant (p < 0.01).
Types of ITS sequences of Codonopsis species and the assumed lineages related to hybridization.
| Species | ITS Type | G + C Content (%) | Nucleotide Position | Sequence Type of Supposed Parental Lineages (Nucleotides at 122nd and 226th) | Number of Specimens | GenBank Accession No. | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 122 | 135 | 226 | 500 | ||||||
|
| P0 | 60.61 | C | G | C | G | EF190460 | ||
| P1 | 60.31 | Y | * | Y | * | P0 (C C) × S0 (T T) | 33 | ||
| P2 | 60.46 | * | * | Y | * | 1 | |||
| P3 | 60.31 | Y | * | Y | * | P0 (C C) × S0 (T T) | 1 | ||
| P4 | 60.31 | Y | * | Y | * | P0 (C C) × S0 (T T) | 2 | ||
| P5 | 60.46 | Y | * | * | * | P0 (C C) × PM0 (T C) | 2 | ||
| PM0 | 60.46 | T | * | * | * | EF190461 | |||
| PM1 | 60.31 | Y | * | Y | * | P0 (C C) × S0 (T T) | 4 | ||
| PM2 | 60.31 | T | * | Y | * | S0 (T T) × PM0 (T C) | 1 | ||
| PM3 | 60.46 | Y | * | * | * | P0 (C C) × PM0 (T C) | 1 | ||
|
| T0 | 60.31 | T | * | * | A | EF190462 | ||
| T1 | 60.15 | T | R | * | R | 1 | |||
| S0 | 60.31 | T | * | T | * | AB769272 | |||
Numerals above sequence are aligned nucleotide positions. Y = C and T, R = A and G, asterisk indicates the identical nucleotide to P0. indicates the additive nucleotide Y (T > C); indicates the additive nucleotide Y (C > T); indicates the additive nucleotide Y (T > C); indicates the additive nucleotide Y (C > T).
Figure 1Four types of additive nucleotide Y at position 122nd or 226th. Y indicates the additive nucleotide Y (T > C) at the 122nd position; Y indicates the additive nucleotide Y (C > T) at the 226th position; Y indicates the additive nucleotide Y (T > C) at the 226th position; Y indicates the additive nucleotide Y (C > T) at the 122nd position.
Figure 2Neighbor-joining (NJ) evolutionary relationships of Codonopsis taxa based on internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequences.
The hybrid ratio of the genus Codonopsis specimens based on the ITS sequences (n = 3).
| Voucher No. | Species | Sequence Type (ITS) | Hybrid Ratio (%, 122nd) | Hybrid Ratio (%, 226th) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CP01 |
| P1 | 33.46 ± 1.29 | 46.89 ± 1.35 |
| CP02 |
| P2 | 33.49 ± 1.55 | |
| CP03 |
| P1 | 37.47 ± 1.47 | 37.07 ± 0.50 |
| CP04 |
| P1 | 36.14 ± 1.73 | 39.39 ± 1.17 |
| CP05 |
| P1 | 48.33 ± 1.56 | 25.14 ± 2.52 |
| CP06 |
| P1 | 35.23 ± 1.31 | 39.18 ± 1.52 |
| CP07 |
| P1 | 33.25 ± 0.70 | 41.59 ± 0.45 |
| CP08 |
| P1 | 44.77 ± 1.09 | 39.70 ± 1.62 |
| CP09 |
| P1 | 31.9 ± 1.17 | 33.57 ± 2.13 |
| CP10 |
| P3 | 32.72 ± 1.48 | 47.79 ± 1.77 |
| CP11 |
| P1 | 40.86 ± 1.71 | 29.05 ± 2.04 |
| CP12 |
| P1 | 38.34 ± 1.26 | 39.92 ± 2.39 |
| CP13 |
| P1 | 35.94 ± 0.98 | 40.33 ± 3.32 |
| CP14 |
| P1 | 44.52 ± 0.72 | 38.14 ± 1.68 |
| CP15 |
| P1 | 35.05 ± 1.40 | 43.61 ± 2.30 |
| CP16 |
| P1 | 30.65 ± 0.99 | 32.98 ± 2.03 |
| CP17 |
| P1 | 32.57 ± 0.80 | 28.64 ± 0.82 |
| CP18 |
| P1 | 45.63 ± 0.93 | 32.35 ± 2.46 |
| CP19 |
| P1 | 39.53 ± 3.48 | 40.20 ± 2.11 |
| CP20 |
| P1 | 32.24 ± 0.63 | 37.79 ± 1.06 |
| CP21 |
| P1 | 40.25 ± 0.21 | 40.62 ± 1.27 |
| CP22 |
| P1 | 35.93 ± 0.35 | 37.99 ± 1.30 |
| CP23 |
| P1 | 39.33 ± 0.94 | 33.61 ± 1.03 |
| CP24 |
| P1 | 36.48 ± 0.57 | 34.09 ± 1.12 |
| CP25 |
| P1 | 39.65 ± 0.17 | 34.66 ± 0.83 |
| CP26 |
| P4 | 47.64 ± 1.72 | 32.05 ± 2.11 |
| CP27 |
| P1 | 34.86 ± 1.51 | 22.40 ± 1.51 |
| CP28 |
| P1 | 43.02 ± 0.83 | 31.94 ± 0.82 |
| CP29 |
| P1 | 40.71 ± 1.63 | 25.37 ± 1.88 |
| CP30 |
| P1 | 48.02 ± 0.41 | 22.07 ± 1.46 |
| CP31 |
| P1 | 43.49 ± 0.46 | 20.11 ± 1.74 |
| CP32 |
| P1 | 47.36 ± 0.41 | 17.41 ± 1.73 |
| CP33 |
| P1 | 28.92 ± 0.49 | 29.00 ± 5.90 |
| CP34 |
| P5 | 34.88 ± 5.96 | |
| CP35 |
| P1 | 46.22 ± 6.07 | 28.87 ± 1.41 |
| CP36 |
| P1 | 43.10 ± 4.92 | 29.25 ± 2.70 |
| CP37 |
| P5 | 39.67 ± 6.60 | |
| CP38 |
| P4 | 24.14 ± 0.85 | 16.47 ± 0.66 |
| CP39 |
| P1 | 34.67 ± 1.01 | 42.17 ± 0.71 |
| CPM40 | PM1 | 36.99 ± 4.01 | 38.67 ± 0.54 | |
| CPM41 | PM1 | 39.29 ± 0.25 | 33.92 ± 1.33 | |
| CPM42 | PM1 | 36.88 ± 0.49 | 21.23 ± 0.66 | |
| CPM43 | PM1 | 22.94 ± 0.80 | 19.67 ± 0.95 | |
| CPM44 | PM2 | 25.56 ± 1.40 | ||
| CPM45 | PM3 | 27.35 ± 1.01 |
The hybrid ratio was equal to ‘Average ± S.D.’.
Cultivated Codonopsis species in this study.
| Voucher No. | Species | Locality | Locality No. | Altitude (m) | Date of Collection | Sequence Type (ITS) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CP01 |
| Liancai, Longde, Guyuan, Ningxia, China | 1 | 1760 | 20 July 2016 | P1 |
| CP02 |
| Kezhai, Longxi, Dingxi, Gansu, China | 2 | 2220 | 25 October 2016 | P2 |
| CP03 |
| Xiaozhai, Minxian, Dingxi, Gansu, China | 3 | 2550 | 25 October 2016 | P1 |
| CP04 |
| Weixin, Minxian, Dingxi, Gansu, China | 4 | 2225 | 25 October 2016 | P1 |
| CP05 |
| Xijiang, Minxian, Dingxi, Gansu, China | 5 | 2254 | 25 October 2016 | P1 |
| CP06 |
| Meichuan, Minxian, Dingxi, Gansu, China | 6 | 2328 | 25 October 2016 | P1 |
| CP07 |
| Minyang, Minxian, Dingxi, Gansu, China | 7 | 2305 | 25 October 2016 | P1 |
| CP27 |
| Minyang, Minxian, Dingxi, Gansu, China | 2305 | 14 October 2017 | P1 | |
| CP08 |
| Chabu, Minxian, Dingxi, Gansu, China | 8 | 2313 | 25 October 2016 | P1 |
| CP28 |
| Mazichuan, Minxian, Dingxi, Gansu, China | 9 | 2510 | 14 October 2017 | P1 |
| CP09 |
| Zhongzhai, Minxian, Dingxi, Gansu, China | 10 | 2381 | 25 October 2016 | P1 |
| CP10 |
| Hadapu, Tanchang, Longnan, Gansu, China | 11 | 2281 | 28 October 2016 | P3 |
| CP11 |
| Hadapu, Tanchang, Longnan, Gansu, China | 2250 | 28 October 2016 | P1 | |
| CP12 |
| Hadapu, Tanchang, Longnan, Gansu, China | 2238 | 28 October 2016 | P1 | |
| CP13 |
| Hadapu, Tanchang, Longnan, Gansu, China | 2233 | 28 October 2016 | P1 | |
| CP14 |
| Hadapu, Tanchang, Longnan, Gansu, China | 2271 | 28 October 2016 | P1 | |
| CP34 |
| Hadapu, Tanchang, Longnan, Gansu, China | 2445 | 14 October 2017 | P4 | |
| CP35 |
| Hadapu, Tanchang, Longnan, Gansu, China | 2435 | 14 October 2017 | P1 | |
| CP36 |
| Hadapu, Tanchang, Longnan, Gansu, China | 2188 | 14 October 2017 | P1 | |
| CP37 |
| Hadapu, Tanchang, Longnan, Gansu, China | 2242 | 14 October 2017 | P3 | |
| CP15 |
| Awu, Tanchang, Longnan, Gansu, China | 12 | 2421 | 28 October 2016 | P1 |
| CP32 |
| Awu, Tanchang, Longnan, Gansu, China | 2351 | 14 October 2017 | P1 | |
| CP33 |
| Awu, Tanchang, Longnan, Gansu, China | 2329 | 14 October 2017 | P1 | |
| CP16 |
| Pangjia, Tanchang, Longnan, Gansu, China | 13 | 2503 | 28 October 2016 | P1 |
| CP17 |
| Pangjia, Tanchang, Longnan, Gansu, China | 2368 | 28 October 2016 | P1 | |
| CP18 |
| Pangjia, Tanchang, Longnan, Gansu, China | 2390 | 28 October 2016 | P1 | |
| CP30 |
| Pangjia, Tanchang, Longnan, Gansu, China | 2431 | 14 October 2017 | P1 | |
| CP31 |
| Pangjia, Tanchang, Longnan, Gansu, China | 2456 | 14 October 2017 | P1 | |
| CP38 |
| Pangjia, Tanchang, Longnan, Gansu, China | 2320 | 14 October 2017 | P5 | |
| CP39 |
| Pangjia, Tanchang, Longnan, Gansu, China | 2306 | 14 October 2017 | P1 | |
| CP19 |
| Lichuan, Tanchang, Longnan, Gansu, China | 14 | 2255 | 28 October 2016 | P1 |
| CP29 |
| Lichuan, Tanchang, Longnan, Gansu, China | 2255 | 14 October 2017 | P1 | |
| CP20 |
| Lichuan, Tanchang, Longnan, Gansu, China | 2286 | 28 October 2016 | P1 | |
| CP21 |
| Lichuan, Tanchang, Longnan, Gansu, China | 2388 | 28 October 2016 | P1 | |
| CP22 |
| Lichuan, Tanchang, Longnan, Gansu, China | 2475 | 28 October 2016 | P1 | |
| CP23 |
| Lichuan, Tanchang, Longnan, Gansu, China | 2314 | 28 October 2016 | P1 | |
| CP24 |
| Lichuan, Tanchang, Longnan, Gansu, China | 2320 | 28 October 2016 | P1 | |
| CP25 |
| Guanzhuang, Yaozhou, Tongchuan, Shaanxi, China | 15 | 880 | 15 November 2016 | P1 |
| CP26 |
| Hongtiguan, Pingshun, Changzhi, Shanxi, China | 16 | 1245 | 12 March 2017 | P4 |
| CPM40 | Danbao, Wenxian, Longnan, Gansu, China | 17 | 895 | 15 October 2016 | PM1 | |
| CPM41 | Koutouba, Wenxian, Longnan, Gansu, China | 18 | 1266 | 15 October 2016 | PM1 | |
| CPM42 | Shifang, Wenxian, Longnan, Gansu, China | 19 | 995 | 28 October 2016 | PM2 | |
| CPM43 | Baoziba, Wenxian, Longnan, Gansu, China | 20 | 1634 | 28 October 2016 | PM2 | |
| CPM44 | Baoziba, Wenxian, Longnan, Gansu, China | 1480 | 28 October 2016 | PM3 | ||
| CPM45 | Zhongzhai, Wenxian, Longnan, Gansu, China | 21 | 1361 | 28 October 2016 | PM2 | |
| CT46 |
| Banqiao, Enshi, Enshi, Hubei, China | 22 | 1775 | 18 August 2016 | T1 |
Localities of collection are shown in Figure 3; the sequence type is indicated in Table 2.
Figure 3Collection sites of Codonopsis specimens during in 2016 and 2017. The numerals of the collection sites are indicated in Table 3. The solid triangles indicate C. pilosula. The solid squares indicate C. pilosula var. modesta. The solid circulars indicate C. tangshen.