Literature DB >> 29958058

Assessment of step accuracy using the Consumer Technology Association standard.

Jennifer A Bunn1, Caleb Jones1, Alexis Oliviera1, Michael J Webster2.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of commercially-available physical activity devices when walking and running at various treadmill speeds using CTA 2056: Physical Activity Monitoring for Fitness Wearables: Step Counting, standard by the Consumer Technology Association (CTA). Twenty participants (10 males and 10 females) completed self-paced walking and running protocols on the treadmill for five minutes each. Eight devices (Apple iWatch series 1, Fitbit Surge, Garmin 235, Moto 360, Polar A360, Suunto Spartan Sport, Suunto Spartan Trainer, and TomTom Spark 3) were tested two at a time, one per wrist. Manual step counts were obtained from video to serve as the benchmark. The mean absolute percent error (MAPE) was calculated during walking and running. During walking, three devices: Fitbit Surge (11.20%), Suunto Sport (22.93%), and TomTom (10.11%) and during running, one device, Polar (10.66%), exceeded the CTA suggestion of a MAPE < 10%. The Moto 360 had the lowest MAPE of all devices for both walking and running. The devices tested had higher step accuracy with running than walking, except for the Polar. Overall, the Apple iWatch series 1, Moto 360, Garmin, and Suunto Spartan Trainer met the CTA standard for both walking and running.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Telehealth standards; fitness; physical activity; wearable technology

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29958058     DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2018.1491941

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci        ISSN: 0264-0414            Impact factor:   3.337


  7 in total

1.  Recommendations for determining the validity of consumer wearable and smartphone step count: expert statement and checklist of the INTERLIVE network.

Authors:  William Johnston; Pedro B Judice; Pablo Molina García; Jan M Mühlen; Esben Lykke Skovgaard; Julie Stang; Moritz Schumann; Shulin Cheng; Wilhelm Bloch; Jan Christian Brønd; Ulf Ekelund; Anders Grøntved; Brian Caulfield; Francisco B Ortega; Luis B Sardinha
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2020-12-24       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 2.  Accuracy and Precision of Energy Expenditure, Heart Rate, and Steps Measured by Combined-Sensing Fitbits Against Reference Measures: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Guillaume Chevance; Natalie M Golaszewski; Elizabeth Tipton; Eric B Hekler; Matthew Buman; Gregory J Welk; Kevin Patrick; Job G Godino
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 4.947

3.  Accuracy of consumer-level and research-grade activity trackers in ambulatory settings in older adults.

Authors:  Salvatore Tedesco; Marco Sica; Andrea Ancillao; Suzanne Timmons; John Barton; Brendan O'Flynn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Validity of the Polar M430 Activity Monitor in Free-Living Conditions: Validation Study.

Authors:  André Henriksen; Sameline Grimsgaard; Alexander Horsch; Gunnar Hartvigsen; Laila Hopstock
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2019-08-16

5.  Accuracy of Mobile Applications versus Wearable Devices in Long-Term Step Measurements.

Authors:  Filippo Piccinini; Giovanni Martinelli; Antonella Carbonaro
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  Wearable Fitness Trackers to Predict Clinical Deterioration in Maintenance Hemodialysis: A Prospective Cohort Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Meaghan Lunney; Natasha Wiebe; Elizabeth Kusi-Appiah; Alexander Tonelli; Rachel Lewis; Reed Ferber; Marcello Tonelli
Journal:  Kidney Med       Date:  2021-06-29

7.  Reliability and Validity of Commercially Available Wearable Devices for Measuring Steps, Energy Expenditure, and Heart Rate: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Daniel Fuller; Emily Colwell; Jonathan Low; Kassia Orychock; Melissa Ann Tobin; Bo Simango; Richard Buote; Desiree Van Heerden; Hui Luan; Kimberley Cullen; Logan Slade; Nathan G A Taylor
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 4.773

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.