Zhaojun Zhu1, Benedikt Hofauer2, Markus Wirth2, Katrin Hasselbacher3, Helmut Frohnhofen4, Clemens Heiser2, Armin Steffen3. 1. Otorhinolaryngology / Head and Neck Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Germany. Electronic address: zhaojun.zhu@gmx.de. 2. Otorhinolaryngology / Head and Neck Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Germany. 3. Department of Otorhinolaryngology/ Head and Neck Surgery, University of Lübeck, Germany. 4. Faculty of Health, Department of Medicine, University Witten-Herdecke, Witten, Germany.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Selective stimulation of the hypoglossal nerve has proven to be an effective therapy for patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The aim of the study is to investigate the efficacy of selective upper airway stimulation (sUAS) in older adults. METHODS: All consecutive patients older than 64 years and who received an implant for sUAS were enrolled. As a control group, an equal number of patients younger than 65 years with matched apnea hypopnea index (AHI) and body-mass-index (BMI) were selected. Treatment outcome data were collected including daytime sleepiness as well as demographics with co-morbidities, BMI, adverse events and adherence to therapy. RESULTS: 62 patients were included. Both the control and study group did not differ significantly for AHI, BMI, and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) (28.7-28.4/h; 30.1 to 28.4 kg/m2; 14.6 to 12.0 points); but co-morbidities were significantly higher in the study group. Our data showed no significant difference between the outcomes of study and control group for AHI, Oxygen desaturation index (ODI) and ESS (6.0-6.0/h; 7.9 to 5.5/h; 5.0 to 7.0 points). Serious adverse events did not occur in both groups and surgical implantation time did not differ. CONCLUSION: sUAS leads to significant reductions of AHI, ODI and ESS in older patients. Despite higher age and more co-morbidities, surgical implantation time was not affected. Older patients showed higher usage of sUAS. Advanced age seems not to be a limiting factor for treatment outcomes of sUAS, thus indication for this treatment can also be applied to older people.
OBJECTIVE: Selective stimulation of the hypoglossal nerve has proven to be an effective therapy for patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The aim of the study is to investigate the efficacy of selective upper airway stimulation (sUAS) in older adults. METHODS: All consecutive patients older than 64 years and who received an implant for sUAS were enrolled. As a control group, an equal number of patients younger than 65 years with matched apnea hypopnea index (AHI) and body-mass-index (BMI) were selected. Treatment outcome data were collected including daytime sleepiness as well as demographics with co-morbidities, BMI, adverse events and adherence to therapy. RESULTS: 62 patients were included. Both the control and study group did not differ significantly for AHI, BMI, and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) (28.7-28.4/h; 30.1 to 28.4 kg/m2; 14.6 to 12.0 points); but co-morbidities were significantly higher in the study group. Our data showed no significant difference between the outcomes of study and control group for AHI, Oxygen desaturation index (ODI) and ESS (6.0-6.0/h; 7.9 to 5.5/h; 5.0 to 7.0 points). Serious adverse events did not occur in both groups and surgical implantation time did not differ. CONCLUSION: sUAS leads to significant reductions of AHI, ODI and ESS in older patients. Despite higher age and more co-morbidities, surgical implantation time was not affected. Older patients showed higher usage of sUAS. Advanced age seems not to be a limiting factor for treatment outcomes of sUAS, thus indication for this treatment can also be applied to older people.
Authors: Clara H Lee; Everett G Seay; Benjamin K Walters; Nicholas J Scalzitti; Raj C Dedhia Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2019-08-15 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Markus Wirth; Daniel Unterhuber; Franziska von Meyer; Benedikt Hofauer; Armin Ott; Guenther Edenharter; Danny J Eckert; Clemens Heiser Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2020-01-13 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Peter R Eastwood; Maree Barnes; Stuart G MacKay; John R Wheatley; David R Hillman; Xuân-Lan Nguyên; Richard Lewis; Matthew C Campbell; Boris Pételle; Jennifer H Walsh; Andrew C Jones; Carsten E Palme; Alain Bizon; Nicole Meslier; Chloé Bertolus; Kathleen J Maddison; Laurent Laccourreye; Guillaume Raux; Katleen Denoncin; Valérie Attali; Frédéric Gagnadoux; Sandrine H Launois Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 2020-01-09 Impact factor: 16.671
Authors: Saif Mashaqi; Salma Imran Patel; Daniel Combs; Lauren Estep; Sonia Helmick; Joan Machamer; Sairam Parthasarathy Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-02-09 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: David Kent; Jeffrey Stanley; R Nisha Aurora; Corinna G Levine; Daniel J Gottlieb; Matthew D Spann; Carlos A Torre; Katherine Green; Christopher G Harrod Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2021-12-01 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Armin Steffen; Clemens Heiser; Wolfgang Galetke; Simon-Dominik Herkenrath; Joachim T Maurer; Eck Günther; Boris A Stuck; Holger Woehrle; Jan Löhler; Winfried Randerath Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2021-06-21 Impact factor: 2.503