Literature DB >> 29957255

Clinical and coronary haemodynamic determinants of recurrent chest pain in patients without obstructive coronary artery disease - A pilot study.

Abdul R Sheikh1, Christopher J Zeitz2, Sharmalar Rajendran2, David P Di Fiore1, Rosanna Tavella3, John F Beltrame4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Coronary haemodynamic testing frequently identifies abnormal pathophysiological parameters in patients with angina and non-obstructed coronaries on angiography (NoCAD) but the clinical utility of these measures has received limited attention.
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to identify the clinical and coronary haemodynamic determinants of recurrent chest pain at one month in patients with NoCAD.
METHODS: Patients with angina, NoCAD (<50% stenosis) and normal LV systolic function underwent invasive coronary haemodynamic testing involving: (1) angiographic TIMI frame and opacification rate, (2) microvascular functional measures including coronary flow reserve (CFR) and hyperaemic microvascular resistance (HMR), (3) coronary endothelial function assessment with low dose intracoronary acetylcholine (IC-ACh) infusions (0.18 μg/min & 1.8 μg/min over 2 min), and (4) Provocative spasm testing with high dose IC-ACh boluses (25, 50 and 100 μg). Clinical and health status were assessed at baseline and one month.
RESULTS: In the 49 NoCAD patients (78% female, mean age of 54 ± 11) undergoing comprehensive coronary haemodynamic testing, 33 (67%) continued to experience chest pain at one month. Determinants of recurrent chest pain on univariate analysis included baseline chest pain status or a HMR > 1.9. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified frequent angina at baseline (OR: 68.9 [4.1, 1165.0], p = 0.003), previous unstable angina admission (OR: 43.9 [3.5, 547.9], p = 0.003) and a HMR > 1.9 (OR: 15.6 [2.1, 114.0], p = 0.007) as independent predictors of recurrent chest pain.
CONCLUSION: In this small pilot study, an abnormal HMR was the only coronary haemodynamic parameter that was a determinant of ongoing angina at short-term follow-up.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acetylcholine; Coronary endothelial dysfunction; Coronary flow reserve; Hyperemic microvascular resistance; Microvascular dysfunction

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29957255     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.04.077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  9 in total

1.  An EAPCI Expert Consensus Document on Ischaemia with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries in Collaboration with European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Coronary Pathophysiology & Microcirculation Endorsed by Coronary Vasomotor Disorders International Study Group.

Authors:  Vijay Kunadian; Alaide Chieffo; Paolo G Camici; Colin Berry; Javier Escaned; Angela H E M Maas; Eva Prescott; Nicole Karam; Yolande Appelman; Chiara Fraccaro; Gill Louise Buchanan; Stephane Manzo-Silberman; Rasha Al-Lamee; Evelyn Regar; Alexandra Lansky; J Dawn Abbott; Lina Badimon; Dirk J Duncker; Roxana Mehran; Davide Capodanno; Andreas Baumbach
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 2.  Vasomotor Dysfunction in Patients with Ischemia and Non-Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease: Current Diagnostic and Therapeutic Strategies.

Authors:  Amr Abouelnour; Tommaso Gori
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2021-11-26

3.  Physiological Stratification of Patients With Angina Due to Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction.

Authors:  Haseeb Rahman; Ozan M Demir; Faisal Khan; Matthew Ryan; Howard Ellis; Mark T Mills; Amedeo Chiribiri; Andrew Webb; Divaka Perera
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 4.  Diagnosis of patients with angina and non-obstructive coronary disease in the catheter laboratory.

Authors:  Haseeb Rahman; David Corcoran; Muhammad Aetesam-Ur-Rahman; Stephen P Hoole; Colin Berry; Divaka Perera
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 5.  Invasive Assessment of Coronary Microvascular Function.

Authors:  Fabio Mangiacapra; Michele Mattia Viscusi; Giuseppe Verolino; Luca Paolucci; Annunziata Nusca; Rosetta Melfi; Gian Paolo Ussia; Francesco Grigioni
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-31       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 6.  Coronary functional assessment in non-obstructive coronary artery disease: Present situation and future direction.

Authors:  Changlin Zhai; Hongyan Fan; Yujuan Zhu; Yunqing Chen; Liang Shen
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-08-23

Review 7.  Angiogenic CD34 Stem Cell Therapy in Coronary Microvascular Repair-A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Balaj Rai; Janki Shukla; Timothy D Henry; Odayme Quesada
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-05-08       Impact factor: 7.666

8.  Ischemia and No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease: Prevalence and Correlates of Coronary Vasomotion Disorders.

Authors:  Thomas J Ford; Eric Yii; Novalia Sidik; Richard Good; Paul Rocchiccioli; Margaret McEntegart; Stuart Watkins; Hany Eteiba; Aadil Shaukat; Mitchell Lindsay; Keith Robertson; Stuart Hood; Ross McGeoch; Robert McDade; Peter McCartney; David Corcoran; Damien Collison; Christopher Rush; Bethany Stanley; Alex McConnachie; Naveed Sattar; Rhian M Touyz; Keith G Oldroyd; Colin Berry
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 6.546

9.  1-Year Outcomes of Angina Management Guided by Invasive Coronary Function Testing (CorMicA).

Authors:  Thomas J Ford; Bethany Stanley; Novalia Sidik; Richard Good; Paul Rocchiccioli; Margaret McEntegart; Stuart Watkins; Hany Eteiba; Aadil Shaukat; Mitchell Lindsay; Keith Robertson; Stuart Hood; Ross McGeoch; Robert McDade; Eric Yii; Peter McCartney; David Corcoran; Damien Collison; Christopher Rush; Naveed Sattar; Alex McConnachie; Rhian M Touyz; Keith G Oldroyd; Colin Berry
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 11.195

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.