Literature DB >> 29957188

Comparative study of acute and mid-term complications with leadless and transvenous cardiac pacemakers.

Daniel J Cantillon1, Srinivas R Dukkipati2, John H Ip3, Derek V Exner4, Imran K Niazi5, Rajesh S Banker6, Mayer Rashtian7, Kenneth Plunkitt8, Gery F Tomassoni9, Yelena Nabutovsky10, Kevin J Davis10, Vivek Y Reddy2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Leadless cardiac pacemakers (LCPs) aim to mitigate lead- and pocket-related complications seen with transvenous pacemakers (TVPs).
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare complications between the LCP cohort from the LEADLESS Pacemaker IDE Study (Leadless II) trial and a propensity score-matched real-world TVP cohort.
METHODS: The multicenter LEADLESS II trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of the Nanostim LCP (Abbott, Abbott Park, IL) using structured follow-up, with serious adverse device effects independently adjudicated. TVP data were obtained from Truven Health MarketScan claims databases for patients implanted with single-chamber TVPs between April 1, 2010 and March 31, 2014 and more than 1 year of preimplant enrollment data. Comorbidities and complications were identified via International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision and Current Procedural Terminology codes. Short-term (≤1 months) and mid-term (>1-18 months) complications were compared between the LCP cohort and a propensity score-matched subset of the TVP cohort.
RESULTS: Among 718 patients with LCPs (mean age 75.6 ± 11.9 years; 62% men) and 1436 patients with TVPs (mean age 76.1 ± 12.3 years; 63% men), patients with LCPs experienced fewer complications (hazard ratio 0.44; 95% confidence interval 0.32-0.60; P < .001), including short-term (5.8% vs 9.4%; P = .01) and mid-term (0.56% vs 4.9%; P < .001) events. In the short-term time frame, patients with LCPs had more pericardial effusions (1.53% vs 0.35%; P = .005); similar rates of vascular events (1.11% vs 0.42%; P = .085), dislodgments (0.97% vs 1.39%; P = .54), and generator complications (0.70% vs 0.28%; P = .17); and no thoracic trauma compared to patients with TVPs (rate of thoracic trauma 3.27%). In short- and mid-term time frames, TVP events absent from the LCP group included lead-related, pocket-related, and infectious complications.
CONCLUSION: Patients with LCPs experienced fewer overall short- and mid-term complications, including infectious and lead- and pocket-related events, but more pericardial effusions, which were uncommon but serious.
Copyright © 2018 Heart Rhythm Society. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Comparative Study; Complications; Leadless; Pacemakers; Transvenous

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29957188     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.04.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.343


  4 in total

1.  Leadless pacing: Going for the jugular.

Authors:  Shmaila Saleem-Talib; Vincent J van Driel; Sevasti-Maria Chaldoupi; Tanja Nikolic; Harry van Wessel; C Jan Willem Borleffs; Hemanth Ramanna
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 1.976

2.  Development and validation of a risk score for predicting pericardial effusion in patients undergoing leadless pacemaker implantation: experience with the Micra transcatheter pacemaker.

Authors:  Jonathan P Piccini; Ryan Cunnane; Jan Steffel; Mikhael F El-Chami; Dwight Reynolds; Paul R Roberts; Kyoko Soejima; Clemens Steinwender; Christophe Garweg; Larry Chinitz; Christopher R Ellis; Kurt Stromberg; Dedra H Fagan; Lluis Mont
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 5.486

3.  Are Endovascular Interventions for Central Vein Obstructions due to Cardiac Implanted Electronic Devices Effective?

Authors:  Charalampos Sotiriadis; Stephanie Volpi; Pauline Douek; Amine Chouiter; Olivier Muller; Salah D Qanadli
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2018-07-30

4.  Contemporaneous Comparison of Outcomes Among Patients Implanted With a Leadless vs Transvenous Single-Chamber Ventricular Pacemaker.

Authors:  Jonathan P Piccini; Mikhael El-Chami; Kael Wherry; George H Crossley; Robert C Kowal; Kurt Stromberg; Colleen Longacre; Jennifer Hinnenthal; Lindsay Bockstedt
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 14.676

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.