Literature DB >> 29956340

Beyond the reactive-proactive dichotomy: Rage, revenge, reward, and recreational aggression predict early high school bully and bully/victim status.

Kevin C Runions1,2, Christina Salmivalli3, Therese Shaw1, Sharyn Burns4, Donna Cross1,5.   

Abstract

The role of reactive and proactive aggression in school bullying perpetration remains unclear. In this study, we explore the predictive value of an expanded model of aggression motives based on the Quadripartite Violence Typology (QVT), which distinguishes between motivational valence (appetitive or aversive) and recruitment of deliberative self-control to derive four classes of motives: Rage, Revenge, Reward, and Recreation. With a sample of 1,802 students from grades 7-9, we assessed aggression motives via self-report, along with self-report of bullying perpetration and victimization, which were used to assign students into categories of Pure Bully, Bully/Victim (B/V), Pure Victim, and Uninvolved. Two structural models were computed to examine the relationship between these four categories of bullying involvement and aggression motives, using conservative and liberal bullying cutoffs. As predicted, B/V status was more strongly related to Rage and Revenge motives. However, B/Vs had higher scores than Pure Bullies for almost all aggression motives, including Recreation. We discuss the implications of addressing Revenge and Recreation, as well as Reward and Rage (which map most clearly to proactive and reactive aggression, respectively) aggression motives, for bullying prevention and intervention strategies, especially among adolescents for whom extant bullying prevention strategies may be ineffective or counterproductive.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bully/victim; bullying; motives; proactive aggression; reactive aggression

Year:  2018        PMID: 29956340     DOI: 10.1002/ab.21770

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aggress Behav        ISSN: 0096-140X            Impact factor:   2.917


  6 in total

1.  A Serial Mediation Model of the Relationship between Cybervictimization and Cyberaggression: The Role of Stress and Unforgiveness Motivations.

Authors:  Cirenia Quintana-Orts; Lourdes Rey; María Teresa Chamizo-Nieto; Everett L Worthington
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Moral Disengagement, Empathy, and Cybervictim's Representation as Predictive Factors of Cyberbullying among Italian Adolescents.

Authors:  Maria Lidia Mascia; Mirian Agus; Maria Assunta Zanetti; Maria Luisa Pedditzi; Dolores Rollo; Mirko Lasio; Maria Pietronilla Penna
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-31       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Correlational study on cyberbullying and social abilities in intercultural teenagers.

Authors:  María Tomé-Fernández; José Manuel Ortiz-Marcos; Christian Fernández-Leyva
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-07-29

4.  Cybervictimization, Self-Concept, Aggressiveness, and School Anxiety in School Children: A Structural Equations Analysis.

Authors:  Raquel Escortell; Beatriz Delgado; María C Martínez-Monteagudo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  The Mediating Role of Classroom Climate on School Violence.

Authors:  David Montero-Montero; Paula López-Martínez; Belén Martínez-Ferrer; David Moreno-Ruiz
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Bullying Perpetration, Moral Disengagement and Need for Popularity: Examining Reciprocal Associations in Adolescence.

Authors:  Eva M Romera; Rosario Ortega-Ruiz; Kevin Runions; Antonio Camacho
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  2021-07-31
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.