Literature DB >> 29956294

3D Genome Organization Influences the Chromosome Translocation Pattern.

Rachel Patton McCord1, Adayabalam Balajee2.   

Abstract

Recent imaging, molecular, and computational modeling studies have greatly enhanced our knowledge of how eukaryotic chromosomes are folded in the nuclear space. This work has begun to reveal how 3D genome structure contributes to various DNA-mediated metabolic activities such as replication, transcription, recombination, and repair. Failure of proper DNA repair can lead to the chromosomal translocations observed in human cancers and other diseases. Questions about the role of 3D genome structure in translocation mechanisms have interested scientists for decades. Recent applications of imaging and Chromosome Conformation Capture approaches have clarified the influence of proximal positioning of chromosomal domains and gene loci on the formation of chromosomal translocations. These approaches have revealed the importance of 3D genome structure not only in translocation partner selection, but also in repair efficiency, likelihood of DNA damage, and the biological implications of translocations. This chapter focuses on our current understanding of the role of 3D genome structure in chromosome translocation formation and its potential implications in disease outcome.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D Genome; Chromatin structure; Chromosome organization; Hi-C; Radiation exposure; Translocation mechanisms

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29956294     DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-0593-1_8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol        ISSN: 0065-2598            Impact factor:   2.622


  8 in total

Review 1.  Chromosome Conformation Capture and Beyond: Toward an Integrative View of Chromosome Structure and Function.

Authors:  Rachel Patton McCord; Noam Kaplan; Luca Giorgetti
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 17.970

2.  Coalescing replication compartments provide the opportunity for recombination between coinfecting herpesviruses.

Authors:  Enosh Tomer; Efrat M Cohen; Nir Drayman; Amichay Afriat; Matthew D Weitzman; Assaf Zaritsky; Oren Kobiler
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 5.834

3.  Meiotic Chromosome Contacts as a Plausible Prelude for Robertsonian Translocations.

Authors:  Sergey Matveevsky; Oxana Kolomiets; Aleksey Bogdanov; Elena Alpeeva; Irina Bakloushinskaya
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 4.096

4.  Chromosome compartmentalization alterations in prostate cancer cell lines model disease progression.

Authors:  Rebeca San Martin; Priyojit Das; Renata Dos Reis Marques; Yang Xu; Justin M Roberts; Jacob T Sanders; Rosela Golloshi; Rachel Patton McCord
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 8.077

5.  Chromosome Folding Promotes Intrachromosomal Aberrations under Radiation- and Nuclease-Induced DNA Breakage.

Authors:  Yuri Eidelman; Ilya Salnikov; Svetlana Slanina; Sergey Andreev
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-11-10       Impact factor: 6.208

6.  Alterations in 3D chromatin organization contribute to tumorigenesis of EGFR-amplified glioblastoma.

Authors:  Qi Yang; Nian Jiang; Han Zou; Xuning Fan; Tao Liu; Xi Huang; Siyi Wanggou; Xuejun Li
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 6.155

7.  Geometrical Properties of the Nucleus and Chromosome Intermingling Are Possible Major Parameters of Chromosome Aberration Formation.

Authors:  Floriane Poignant; Ianik Plante; Zarana S Patel; Janice L Huff; Tony C Slaba
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 6.208

8.  ChiTaRS 5.0: the comprehensive database of chimeric transcripts matched with druggable fusions and 3D chromatin maps.

Authors:  Deepak Balamurali; Alessandro Gorohovski; Rajesh Detroja; Vikrant Palande; Dorith Raviv-Shay; Milana Frenkel-Morgenstern
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 16.971

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.