OBJECTIVE: We investigated if anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (A-tDCS), applied over the supplementary motor areas (SMAs), could improve gait initiation in Parkinson's disease (PD) with freezing of gait (FOG). METHODS: In this double-blinded cross-over pilot study, ten PD with FOG underwent two stimulation sessions: A-tDCS (1 mA, 10 min) and sham stimulation. Eight blocks of gait initiation were collected per session: (1) pre-tDCS, with acoustic cueing; (2) pre-tDCS, self-initiated (no cue); and (3-8) post-tDCS, self-initiated. Gait initiation kinetics were analyzed with two-way repeated measures ANOVAs for the effects of A-tDCS. RESULTS: A-tDCS did not significantly improve the magnitude or timing of anticipatory postural adjustments or the execution of the first step during self-initiated gait compared with baseline measures (p > .13). The lack of significant change was not due to an inability to generate functional APAs since external cueing markedly improved gait initiation (p < .01). CONCLUSIONS: A single dose of A-tDCS over the SMAs did not improve self-initiated gait in PD and FOG. Alternative approaches using a different dose or cortical target are worthy of exploration since individuals demonstrated the capacity to improve. SIGNIFICANCE: Neuromodulation strategies tailored to facilitate SMA activity may be ineffective for the treatment of gait initiation impairment in people with PD and FOG.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: We investigated if anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (A-tDCS), applied over the supplementary motor areas (SMAs), could improve gait initiation in Parkinson's disease (PD) with freezing of gait (FOG). METHODS: In this double-blinded cross-over pilot study, ten PD with FOG underwent two stimulation sessions: A-tDCS (1 mA, 10 min) and sham stimulation. Eight blocks of gait initiation were collected per session: (1) pre-tDCS, with acoustic cueing; (2) pre-tDCS, self-initiated (no cue); and (3-8) post-tDCS, self-initiated. Gait initiation kinetics were analyzed with two-way repeated measures ANOVAs for the effects of A-tDCS. RESULTS: A-tDCS did not significantly improve the magnitude or timing of anticipatory postural adjustments or the execution of the first step during self-initiated gait compared with baseline measures (p > .13). The lack of significant change was not due to an inability to generate functional APAs since external cueing markedly improved gait initiation (p < .01). CONCLUSIONS: A single dose of A-tDCS over the SMAs did not improve self-initiated gait in PD and FOG. Alternative approaches using a different dose or cortical target are worthy of exploration since individuals demonstrated the capacity to improve. SIGNIFICANCE: Neuromodulation strategies tailored to facilitate SMA activity may be ineffective for the treatment of gait initiation impairment in people with PD and FOG.
Entities:
Keywords:
Freezing of gait (FOG); Gait initiation; Parkinson’s disease; Supplementary motor area (SMA); Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)
Authors: Elisabeth Kaminski; Christopher J Steele; Maike Hoff; Christopher Gundlach; Viola Rjosk; Bernhard Sehm; Arno Villringer; Patrick Ragert Journal: Clin Neurophysiol Date: 2016-04-01 Impact factor: 3.708
Authors: John G Nutt; Bastiaan R Bloem; Nir Giladi; Mark Hallett; Fay B Horak; Alice Nieuwboer Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2011-08 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Brett W Fling; Rajal G Cohen; Martina Mancini; Samuel D Carpenter; Damien A Fair; John G Nutt; Fay B Horak Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-06-17 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Daniel Weiss; Anna Schoellmann; Michael D Fox; Nicolaas I Bohnen; Stewart A Factor; Alice Nieuwboer; Mark Hallett; Simon J G Lewis Journal: Brain Date: 2020-01-01 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Christin M Sadler; Aline Tiemi Kami; Julie Nantel; Jonathan Lommen; Anthony N Carlsen Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2022-06-14 Impact factor: 4.086
Authors: Gilles Allali; Helena M Blumen; Hervé Devanne; Elvira Pirondini; Arnaud Delval; Dimitri Van De Ville Journal: Neurophysiol Clin Date: 2018-10-25 Impact factor: 3.734