| Literature DB >> 29955409 |
Aya Kodama-Takahashi1, Koji Sugioka1, Tomoko Sato1, Koichi Nishida1, Keiichi Aomatsu1, Masahiko Fukuda1, Yoshikazu Shimomura1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To report a case of persistent corneal epithelial defect that had occurred after a trigeminal nerve block. CASEEntities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29955409 PMCID: PMC6000878 DOI: 10.1155/2018/6815407
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Case Rep Ophthalmol Med
Details of the clinical findings of the right eye.
| Time point after trigeminal nerve block | Clinical findings | Stage of NK | Corneal sensation (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 days: First visit | Severe conjunctival hyperemia | Stage 2 | <10 |
|
| |||
| 1 week | Severe conjunctival hyperemia | Stage 2 | <10 |
|
| |||
| 1 month | Superficial punctate keratopathy (SPK) | Stage 2 | 10 |
|
| |||
| 2 months | Superficial punctate keratopathy (SPK) | Stage 1-2 | 10 |
|
| |||
| 5 months | Mild irregularity of corneal epithelium, stromal scarring in the central cornea, conjunctival hyperemia and corneal superficial neovascularization are overall improving. | Stage 1 | 50 |
|
| |||
| 6 months | SPK and conjunctival hyperemia, corneal superficial neovascularization, and corneal stromal edema were all ameliorated. | 60 | |
Figure 1Slit-lamp images of the right eye showing the clinical course.(a) One week after the trigeminal nerve block, corneal epithelial defects, severe conjunctival hyperemia all around the periphery, cloudy and irregular corneal epithelium and Descemet's membrane folds, and mild stromal edema were noted. (b) One week after the trigeminal nerve block, the corneal epithelial defects were shown using fluorescein staining. (c) One month after the nerve block, PED were noted. Severe conjunctival hyperemia, very severe corneal superficial neovascularization at 11 to 5 o'clock, and corneal stromal edema in the central cornea were also observed. (d) Two months after the trigeminal nerve block, the epithelial defects were improved but SPK, corneal superficial neovascularization at 11 to 5 o'clock, irregularity of corneal epithelium, and stromal scarring in the central cornea remained. (e) Five months after the nerve block, slight irregularity of corneal epithelium and stromal scarring in the central cornea were observed. Corneal superficial neovascularization showed signs of improvement although SPK remained. (f) Six months after the nerve block, SPK and conjunctival hyperemia, corneal superficial neovascularization, and corneal stromal edema were all improved.
Figure 2Evaluation of the subbasal nerve fibers in the cornea with the HRT II RCM. Size bar = 100 μm. (a) Four months after the nerve block, the subbasal nerve fibers were hardly observed in the right eye. (b) Four months after the nerve block, the subbasal nerve fibers were observed in the fellow eye. (c) Six months after the nerve block, regenerated subbasal nerve fibers were observed starting from the periphery of the right cornea, although they appeared small and short. (d) Six months after the nerve block, subbasal nerve fibers were observed in the fellow eye.