| Literature DB >> 29955279 |
Siduduziwe Ncube-Phiri1, Alice Ncube2, Lessing Mucherera1, Khululi Ncube3.
Abstract
Artisanal small-scale mining (ASM) has devastating impacts on the environment, such as deforestation, over-stripping of overburden, burning of bushes and use of harmful chemicals like mercury. These environmental impacts are a result of destructive mining, wasteful mineral extraction and processing practices and techniques used by the artisanal small-scale miners. This paper explores the ecological problems caused by ASM in Mzingwane District, Zimbabwe. It seeks to determine the nature and extent to which the environment has been damaged by the ASM from a community perspective. Interviews, questionnaires and observations were used to collect qualitative data. Results indicated that the nature of the mining activities undertaken by unskilled and under-equipped gold panners in Mzingwane District is characterised by massive stripping of overburden and burning of bushes, leading to destruction of large tracts of land and river systems and general ecosystem disturbance. The research concluded that ASM in Mzingwane District is an ecological time bomb, stressing the need for appropriate modifications of the legal and institutional frameworks for promoting sustainable use of natural resources and mining development in Zimbabwe. Government, through the Ministry of Small Scale and Medium Enterprises, need to regularise and formalise all gold mining activities through licensing, giving permanent claims and operating permits to panners in order to recoup some of the added costs in the form of taxes. At the local level, the Mzingwane Rural District Council (MRDC) together with the Environmental Management Agency (EMA) need to design appropriate environmental education and awareness programmes targeting the local community and gold panners.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 29955279 PMCID: PMC6014108 DOI: 10.4102/jamba.v7i1.158
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Jamba ISSN: 1996-1421
FIGURE 1Mzingwane District study area.
FIGURE 2Respondents’ age profile.
Level of education.
| Schooling | Panners | Stakeholders |
|---|---|---|
| No schooling | 0 | 0 |
| Primary level | 64 | 30 |
| Secondary level | 32 | 60 |
| Tertiary level | 4 | 10 |
Panners’ nature of engagement.
| Nature of engagement | Panners (%) |
|---|---|
| Full time | 26 |
| Part time | 51 |
| Seasonally | 23 |
| Occasionally | 0 |
Panners’ experience.
| Panning experience (years) | Panners (%) |
|---|---|
| 0–5 | 33 |
| 6–10 | 41 |
| 11–15 | 17 |
| 16–20 | 9 |
| 20+ | 0 |
Panning drivers.
| Panning drivers | Panners (%) |
|---|---|
| Lack of employment | 90 |
| Inadequate income | 60 |
| Drought | 40 |
FIGURE 3Respondents’ perception of intensity of environmental problems.
FIGURE 4Ward 20 severely burnt by high-profile, mechanised panners.
Catchment dam levels.
| Dams | Years | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 (%) | 2009 (%) | 2010 (%) | 2011 (%) | |
| Umzingwane | 19 | 24 | 7 | 15 |
| Inyankuni | 14 | 8 | 0 | 20 |
| Upper Ncema | 45 | 65 | 0 | 30 |
| Lower Ncema | 63 | 73 | 51 | 76 |
Source: ZINWA (2008, 2009, 2010, 2011)
Note: Please see the full reference list of the article, Ncube-Phiri, S., Ncube, A., Mucherera, B. & Ncube, M., 2015, ‘Artisanal small-scale mining: Potential ecological disaster in Mzingwane District, Zimbabwe’, Jàmbá: Journal of Disaster Risk Studies 7(1), Art. #158, 11 pages. http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/jamba.v7i1.158, for more information.
FIGURE 5Panning activities near Umzingwane Dam.
FIGURE 6Umzingwane Dam, central section.
Artisanal small-scale mining areas.
| Village | m2 | Total m2 | Total km2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Malungwane | 3000 m x 200 m | 600 000 m2 | 0.6 km2 |
| Mawabeni 1 | 1000 m x 200 m | 200 000 m2 | 0.2 km2 |
| Mawabeni 2 | 5000 m x 3000 m | 15 000 000 m2 | 15 km2 |
FIGURE 7Excavations and land degradation in Mawabeni.
FIGURE 8Ecological problems in Mzingwane District identified by respondents.
Ranking of ecological problems.
| Respondents | Rank | Ecological problems | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stakeholders | 1 | Veld fires | 78 |
| 2 | Land degradation | 71 | |
| 3 | Siltation | 64 | |
| 4 | Open pits | 57 | |
| 5 | Deforestation | 35 | |
| 6 | Water pollution and gully formation | 28 | |
| 7 | Desertification and poaching | 21 | |
| Panners | 1 | Deforestation | 80 |
| 2 | Open pits | 60 | |
| 3 | Veld fires and soil erosion | 50 | |
| 4 | Water pollution | 40 | |
| 5 | Land degradation and gully formation | 30 | |
| 6 | Desertification | 0 | |
| 7 | Siltation | 0 |
FIGURE 9Vulnerable elements in Mzingwane District identified by respondents.
Mitigation strategies in Mzingwane.
| Mitigation strategies | Regulations | Regulatory authorities |
|---|---|---|
| Awareness campaigns | Rural District Council conservation by laws | EMA, Forestry Commission, National Parks and Wildlife Department, Ministry of Mines |
| Council rangers | Government and council policies | Bulawayo City Council Water Supplies, ZINWA |
| Policing | Statutory Instruments | ZRP |
| Fines | Ministry of Mines and Minerals Act | EMA |
EMA, Environmental Management Agency; ZINWA, Zimbabwe National Water Authority; ZRP, Zimbabwe Republic Police.
FIGURE 10Potential disasters in Mzingwane District as perceived by respondents.