Jan Chovancik1, Veronika Bulkova2, Dan Wichterle3, Ondrej Toman2,4, Lukas Rybka2, Jaroslav Januska1, Jindrich Spinar4, Martin Fiala2,4. 1. Department of Cardiology, Hospital Podlesi, Trinec, Czech Republic. 2. Department of Cardiology, Center of Cardiovascular Care, Neuron Medical, Brno, Czech Republic. 3. Department of Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic. 4. Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic.
Abstract
AIMS: Optimal ECG monitoring in detecting recurrences of atrial fibrillation (AF) or atrial tachycardia (AT) after catheter ablation has not been well established. The purpose of this prospective study was to compare the utility of daily ECG monitoring with episodic card recorder (ECR) vs. periodic monitoring with episodic loop recorder (ELR) for the detection of post-blanking AF/AT recurrences during early (Months 4-6) and late (Months 7-12) periods after catheter ablation for paroxysmal AF. METHODS: The study included 105 consecutive patients, who received ECR for 12 months and were instructed to send at least 2 random ECG recordings daily with extra-recordings during symptoms. The patients were simultaneously monitored for one week with ELR at the end of each period (Months 6 and 12). RESULTS: Thirty-one and 12 patients with AF/AT recurrence were identified by means of ECR and ELR, respectively. In patients with complete and valid data, ELR technology was inferior to ECR by detecting AF/AT in 5 (31%) of 16 and 5 (26%) of 19 patients with arrhythmia identified by ECR in the early and late period, respectively. Overall, ELR had a sensitivity of 8/23 (35%) for detecting AF/AT recurrence. There was no single patient with AF/AT recurrence on ELR that would not be known from ECR monitoring. Only 2 patients with arrhythmia recurrence were completely asymptomatic throughout the study period. CONCLUSION: Daily ECG monitoring with ECR was better than periodic monitoring with ELR in detecting AF/AT recurrences during the follow-up periods. Entirely asymptomatic patients with AF/AT recurrences were rare.
AIMS: Optimal ECG monitoring in detecting recurrences of atrial fibrillation (AF) or atrial tachycardia (AT) after catheter ablation has not been well established. The purpose of this prospective study was to compare the utility of daily ECG monitoring with episodic card recorder (ECR) vs. periodic monitoring with episodic loop recorder (ELR) for the detection of post-blanking AF/AT recurrences during early (Months 4-6) and late (Months 7-12) periods after catheter ablation for paroxysmal AF. METHODS: The study included 105 consecutive patients, who received ECR for 12 months and were instructed to send at least 2 random ECG recordings daily with extra-recordings during symptoms. The patients were simultaneously monitored for one week with ELR at the end of each period (Months 6 and 12). RESULTS: Thirty-one and 12 patients with AF/AT recurrence were identified by means of ECR and ELR, respectively. In patients with complete and valid data, ELR technology was inferior to ECR by detecting AF/AT in 5 (31%) of 16 and 5 (26%) of 19 patients with arrhythmia identified by ECR in the early and late period, respectively. Overall, ELR had a sensitivity of 8/23 (35%) for detecting AF/AT recurrence. There was no single patient with AF/AT recurrence on ELR that would not be known from ECR monitoring. Only 2 patients with arrhythmia recurrence were completely asymptomatic throughout the study period. CONCLUSION: Daily ECG monitoring with ECR was better than periodic monitoring with ELR in detecting AF/AT recurrences during the follow-up periods. Entirely asymptomatic patients with AF/AT recurrences were rare.