J Iruthayarajah1, A McIntyre2, M Mirkowski2, P Welch-West3, E Loh2,3,4, R Teasell2,3,4. 1. Lawson Health Research Institute, Parkwood Institute, London, ON, Canada. Jerome.Iruthayarajah@sjhc.london.on.ca. 2. Lawson Health Research Institute, Parkwood Institute, London, ON, Canada. 3. Parkwood Institute, St. Joseph's Health Care London, London, ON, Canada. 4. Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. OBJECTIVE: To determine the risk factors predictive of dysphagia after a spinal cord injury (SCI). SETTING: None. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was performed in five scientific databases for English articles that identified risk factors for dysphagia after a SCI in adult (≥19 years) individuals. Data extracted included: author name, year and country of publication, participant demographics, sample size, study design, method of dysphagia diagnosis, and risk factor percentages. Methodological quality of studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. For identified risk factors, risk percentages were transformed into risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals. Quantitative synthesis was performed for risk factors reported in two or more studies using restricted maximum-likelihood estimator random effects models. RESULTS: Eleven studies met inclusion criteria of which ten studies were of moderate quality (n = 10). Significant risk factors included: age, injury severity, level of injury, presence of tracheostomy, coughing, voice quality, bronchoscopy need, pneumonia, mechanical ventilation, nasogastric tubes, comorbid injury, and a cervical surgery. Results of the quantitative synthesis indicated that the presence of a tracheostomy posed a threefold greater risk of the development of dysphagia (RR: 3.67); while, cervical surgery posed a 1.3 times greater risk of the development of dysphagia (RR: 1.30). CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of these risk factors can be a resource for clinicians in the early diagnosis and appropriate medical management of dysphagia post SCI.
STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. OBJECTIVE: To determine the risk factors predictive of dysphagia after a spinal cord injury (SCI). SETTING: None. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was performed in five scientific databases for English articles that identified risk factors for dysphagia after a SCI in adult (≥19 years) individuals. Data extracted included: author name, year and country of publication, participant demographics, sample size, study design, method of dysphagia diagnosis, and risk factor percentages. Methodological quality of studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. For identified risk factors, risk percentages were transformed into risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals. Quantitative synthesis was performed for risk factors reported in two or more studies using restricted maximum-likelihood estimator random effects models. RESULTS: Eleven studies met inclusion criteria of which ten studies were of moderate quality (n = 10). Significant risk factors included: age, injury severity, level of injury, presence of tracheostomy, coughing, voice quality, bronchoscopy need, pneumonia, mechanical ventilation, nasogastric tubes, comorbid injury, and a cervical surgery. Results of the quantitative synthesis indicated that the presence of a tracheostomy posed a threefold greater risk of the development of dysphagia (RR: 3.67); while, cervical surgery posed a 1.3 times greater risk of the development of dysphagia (RR: 1.30). CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of these risk factors can be a resource for clinicians in the early diagnosis and appropriate medical management of dysphagia post SCI.
Authors: Marissa C Ciesla; Yasin B Seven; Latoya L Allen; Kristin N Smith; Elisa J Gonzalez-Rothi; Gordon S Mitchell Journal: Exp Neurol Date: 2021-10-24 Impact factor: 5.330