Literature DB >> 29954883

Complete Genome Sequences of a Diverse Group of 13 Propionibacterium acnes Bacteriophages Isolated from Urban Raw Sewage.

Gustavo Ybazeta1, Jenna Graham2, Jelena Trifkovic3, Lyne Giroux4, Mazen Saleh5, Syed A Sattar3,6, Reza Nokhbeh1,4.   

Abstract

We present complete genome sequences of 13 Propionibacterium acnes phages isolated from urban raw sewage. They belong to the family Siphoviridae, have genome sizes of 29,450.6 ± 256.5 nucleotides and G+C contents of 54.14% ± 0.22% and contain 42 to 45 coding DNA sequences (CDS). Genomic sequences of 9 of 13 phages were divergent by 6 to 10%, distinguishing them as species.
Copyright © 2018 Ybazeta et al.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 29954883      PMCID: PMC6025933          DOI: 10.1128/genomeA.00224-18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Announc


GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Restricted diversity among phages isolated from limited sources cannot represent the actual global diversity (1). Raw sewage from metropolitan areas with multiethnic communities is a rich and unique source of phages, reflecting the global diversity of their human populations. Such a source is crucial for obtaining a diverse collection of phages against a given pathogen for use in cocktails effective in clinical practice. For this study, we sampled urban raw sewage every 1 to 2 months over a 6-month period from two sewage treatment facilities (Ottawa and Gatineau, Canada) and successfully obtained a genetically diverse population of phages against eight Propionibacterium acnes indicator strains. The phage plaques, isolated by the agar overlay method, were purified and used for genomic DNA isolation. Our initial BamHI restriction analysis of the phages’ genomic DNA revealed multiple restriction banding patterns indicative of genetic diversity (not shown), which prompted further analysis by full-genome sequencing. The genomes of 13 representative Propionibacterium acnes phages from a larger collection were sequenced using Illumina HiSeq 2500 (with a paired-end 125-bp read length) and Nanopore MinION MK1 platforms. De novo hybrid assembly of genomes was performed using SPAdes v3.20.1 (2) and Unicycler v0.4.3 (3) as previously described (4). SeqKit v0.4.5, Sickle v1.33, and FastQC v0.11.5 were used for downsampling the Illumina reads to ∼100×, trimming reads, and quality controlling, respectively (5–7). The MinION reads were demultiplexed by Metrichor, and Porechop v0.2.1 was used to remove the adapters (8). The MinION long reads were used to produce bridges in hybrid assembly using Illumina output to generate single contigs (4, 9). The assembled single contigs for each phage were further analyzed for accuracy and quality using Bandage v0.8.1 (10) and annotated using Rapid Annotations using Subsystems Technology (RAST) v2.0 (11). The phages are cos type with 11-nucleotide 3ʹ-overhang sequences at either end. They have an average genome size of 29,450.6 ± 256.5 nucleotides (Table 1) with an average G+C content of 54.14% ± 0.22% and 42 to 45 CDS.
TABLE 1

Summary of the phage genomes deposited in GenBank and their accession numbers

Accession no.Phage nameLength (bp)Avg coverage (×)SD
MG820632pa31029,508276.2916.62
MG820633pa5929,507267.2616.35
MG820634pa2729,593607.9524.66
MG820635pa29399-1-D_129,370379.0419.47
MG820636pa29399-1-D_228,892567.7720.99
MG820637pa6329,446691.4626.30
MG820638pa6919-429,784241.8015.55
MG820639pa9-6919-429,784686.4526.20
MG820640pa1529,309738.3327.17
MG820641pa61529,307619.7424.89
MG820642pa2829,733196.0514.00
MG820643pa3529,491762.9027.62
MG820644pa3329,135773.6027.81
Summary of the phage genomes deposited in GenBank and their accession numbers BLASTN analysis of these genomes against the previously published genome sequences of similar phages in the GenBank nucleotide database showed 6 to 10% variation for 9 of the 13 phages. The majority of these sequence differences were mapped to the right arm coding strand for nonstructural proteins, highlighting significant diversity among the isolates (12). The International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV) defines “species” on the basis of >5% differences between two genomes (13; see also http://www.ictv.global/proposals-16/2016.034a-dB.A.v1.Pa6virus.pdf). Based on this criterion, 9 of the 13 phage genomes described here are considered distinct species. These include pa310 and pa59, pa6919-4 and pa9-6919-4, pa15 and pa615, pa33 and pa35, pa27, pa29399-1-D_1, pa29399-1-D_2, pa63, and pa28. In conclusion, successful isolation of a diverse group of phages using raw sewage from multiethnic urban centers, together with the use of multiple bacterial indicator strains, highlights the importance of the classical methods of constructing phage collections. This has important implications for strategizing development of phage cocktails for clinical use.

Accession number(s).

The GenBank accession numbers of these phages are listed in Table 1.
  10 in total

1.  SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing.

Authors:  Anton Bankevich; Sergey Nurk; Dmitry Antipov; Alexey A Gurevich; Mikhail Dvorkin; Alexander S Kulikov; Valery M Lesin; Sergey I Nikolenko; Son Pham; Andrey D Prjibelski; Alexey V Pyshkin; Alexander V Sirotkin; Nikolay Vyahhi; Glenn Tesler; Max A Alekseyev; Pavel A Pevzner
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 1.479

2.  The diversity and host interactions of Propionibacterium acnes bacteriophages on human skin.

Authors:  Jared Liu; Riceley Yan; Qiao Zhong; Sam Ngo; Nathanael J Bangayan; Lin Nguyen; Timothy Lui; Minghsun Liu; Marie C Erfe; Noah Craft; Shuta Tomida; Huiying Li
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 10.302

3.  Changes to taxonomy and the International Code of Virus Classification and Nomenclature ratified by the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (2017).

Authors:  Michael J Adams; Elliot J Lefkowitz; Andrew M Q King; Balázs Harrach; Robert L Harrison; Nick J Knowles; Andrew M Kropinski; Mart Krupovic; Jens H Kuhn; Arcady R Mushegian; Max Nibert; Sead Sabanadzovic; Hélène Sanfaçon; Stuart G Siddell; Peter Simmonds; Arvind Varsani; Francisco Murilo Zerbini; Alexander E Gorbalenya; Andrew J Davison
Journal:  Arch Virol       Date:  2017-04-22       Impact factor: 2.574

4.  SeqKit: A Cross-Platform and Ultrafast Toolkit for FASTA/Q File Manipulation.

Authors:  Wei Shen; Shuai Le; Yan Li; Fuquan Hu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Propionibacterium acnes bacteriophages display limited genetic diversity and broad killing activity against bacterial skin isolates.

Authors:  Laura J Marinelli; Sorel Fitz-Gibbon; Clarmyra Hayes; Charles Bowman; Megan Inkeles; Anya Loncaric; Daniel A Russell; Deborah Jacobs-Sera; Shawn Cokus; Matteo Pellegrini; Jenny Kim; Jeff F Miller; Graham F Hatfull; Robert L Modlin
Journal:  MBio       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 7.867

6.  Bandage: interactive visualization of de novo genome assemblies.

Authors:  Ryan R Wick; Mark B Schultz; Justin Zobel; Kathryn E Holt
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  Complete Genome Sequence of Enterococcus thailandicus Strain a523 Isolated from Urban Raw Sewage.

Authors:  Gustavo Ybazeta; Laura Douglas; Jenna Graham; Nya L Fraleigh; Yanal Murad; Justo Perez; Francisco Diaz-Mitoma; Kim Tilbe; Reza Nokhbeh
Journal:  Genome Announc       Date:  2017-11-22

8.  Completing bacterial genome assemblies with multiplex MinION sequencing.

Authors:  Ryan R Wick; Louise M Judd; Claire L Gorrie; Kathryn E Holt
Journal:  Microb Genom       Date:  2017-09-14

9.  Unicycler: Resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads.

Authors:  Ryan R Wick; Louise M Judd; Claire L Gorrie; Kathryn E Holt
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  The SEED and the Rapid Annotation of microbial genomes using Subsystems Technology (RAST).

Authors:  Ross Overbeek; Robert Olson; Gordon D Pusch; Gary J Olsen; James J Davis; Terry Disz; Robert A Edwards; Svetlana Gerdes; Bruce Parrello; Maulik Shukla; Veronika Vonstein; Alice R Wattam; Fangfang Xia; Rick Stevens
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 16.971

  10 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Actinobacteriophages: Genomics, Dynamics, and Applications.

Authors:  Graham F Hatfull
Journal:  Annu Rev Virol       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 10.431

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.