| Literature DB >> 29954658 |
Mohit K Turagam1, Poonam Velagapudi2, Saibal Kar3, David Holmes4, Vivek Y Reddy1, Marwan M Refaat5, Luigi Di Biase6, Amin Al-Ahmed7, Mina K Chung8, Thorsten Lewalter9, James Edgerton10, James Cox11, John Fisher6, Andrea Natale7, Dhanunjaya R Lakkireddy12.
Abstract
Left atrial appendage (LAA) closure has evolved as an effective strategy for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation who are considered suitable for oral anticoagulation. There is strong evidence based on randomized clinical trials with 1 percutaneous device, as well as a large registry experience with several devices, regarding the safety and efficacy of this strategy. In addition, there is encouraging data regarding the effect of epicardial LAA closure on decreasing arrhythmia burden and improvements in systemic homeostasis by neurohormonal modulation. However, there are several unresolved issues regarding optimal patient selection, device selection, management of periprocedural complications including device-related thrombus, residual leaks, and pericarditis. In this review, we summarize the rationale, evidence, optimal patient selection, and common challenges encountered with mechanical LAA exclusion.Entities:
Keywords: anticoagulants; atrial fibrillation; cardiac surgical procedures; stroke; thromboembolism
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29954658 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.05.048
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol ISSN: 0735-1097 Impact factor: 24.094