Taoping Bai1, Yuqiu Liu2, Jiche Liu2, Chenhao Yu3, Wentao Jiang4, Yubo Fan5. 1. Department of Applied Mechanics, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China. 2. College of Architecture & Environment, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China. 3. West China School/Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China. 4. Department of Applied Mechanics, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China. Electronic address: scubme@aliyun.com. 5. School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This article compares the effect of different surfactants on foam stability and determines the foam decay relationship, so that the suitability of surfactants in a clinical setting can be evaluated. METHODS: Five different surfactants were used to prepare sclerosing foam at room temperature using a liquid:gas ratio of 1:4 in vitro. Foam decay experiments were performed for each sample using a laboratory-made foaming apparatus, and the process was recorded using a video camera. The stability indices used included the drainage time, drainage rate, half-life, foam half-life volume, surfactant stability index, and foaming index. RESULTS: The sodium morrhuate foam was relatively more stable than the polidocanol foam, but exhibited weak foaming. After the addition of the surfactants, the foam half-life was less than 300 seconds. The effect of the surfactants on the stability of the sodium morrhuate foam was more pronounced. The surfactant stability indices could be arranged as follows: poloxamer 188 > Tween 80 > macrogol 4000 > propanediol > lecithin. However, the differences in the foaming indices were small. CONCLUSIONS: Of the five surfactants tested, poloxamer 188 has best performance to enhance sclerosing foam stability. The addition of the surfactants improved the stability of the sclerosing foams. It was observed that the relationships between the foam half-life and the surfactant stability index and the surfactant concentration follow the power law.
OBJECTIVE: This article compares the effect of different surfactants on foam stability and determines the foam decay relationship, so that the suitability of surfactants in a clinical setting can be evaluated. METHODS: Five different surfactants were used to prepare sclerosing foam at room temperature using a liquid:gas ratio of 1:4 in vitro. Foam decay experiments were performed for each sample using a laboratory-made foaming apparatus, and the process was recorded using a video camera. The stability indices used included the drainage time, drainage rate, half-life, foam half-life volume, surfactant stability index, and foaming index. RESULTS: The sodium morrhuate foam was relatively more stable than the polidocanol foam, but exhibited weak foaming. After the addition of the surfactants, the foam half-life was less than 300 seconds. The effect of the surfactants on the stability of the sodium morrhuate foam was more pronounced. The surfactant stability indices could be arranged as follows: poloxamer 188 > Tween 80 > macrogol 4000 > propanediol > lecithin. However, the differences in the foaming indices were small. CONCLUSIONS: Of the five surfactants tested, poloxamer 188 has best performance to enhance sclerosing foam stability. The addition of the surfactants improved the stability of the sclerosing foams. It was observed that the relationships between the foam half-life and the surfactant stability index and the surfactant concentration follow the power law.