| Literature DB >> 29954428 |
Fábio Raphael Pascoti Bruhn1, Maria Helena Franco Morais2, Denis Lucio Cardoso3, Nádia Campos Pereira Bruhn4, Fernando Ferreira5, Christiane Maria Barcellos Magalhães da Rocha6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Visceral leishmaniasis is a serious public health problem in Brazil, and control of this disease constitutes a major challenge. The purpose of this study was to assess the existing spatial and temporal relationships between cases of canine visceral leishmaniasis (CanL) and human visceral leishmaniasis (HVL) recorded in Belo Horizonte, State of Minas Gerais, from 2006 to 2013.Entities:
Keywords: Epidemiology; Leishmania infantum; Public health; Spatial analysis; Time series
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29954428 PMCID: PMC6022701 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-018-2877-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Fig. 1Coverage area of nine Sanitary Districts of Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
HVL, PCP (%) and PMH (%) in Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil, 2006–2013 broken down by year and sanitary district
| Variable | HVL | CanL | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cases | PMH | PCP | ||
| Sanitary district | Barreiro | 77 | 8.3 | 6.8 |
| Centro-sul | 36 | 5.2 | 3.4 | |
| Leste | 94 | 5.4 | 6.0 | |
| Nordeste | 156 | 7.3 | 7.5 | |
| Noroeste | 148 | 5.5 | 6.6 | |
| Norte | 96 | 6.2 | 6.7 | |
| Oeste | 74 | 5.9 | 5.8 | |
| Pampulha | 45 | 6.9 | 6.8 | |
| Venda nova | 133 | 6.2 | 7.9 | |
| Totala | 866 | 6.3 | 6.4 | |
| Yearb | 2006 | 128 | 11.9 ± 3.9 | 4.8 ± 1.4 |
| 2007 | 111 | 10.4 ± 3.6 | 3.7 ± 2.4 | |
| 2008 | 160 | 7.5 ± 1.9 | 6.0 ± 4.9 | |
| 2009 | 141 | 7.7 ± 3.8 | 12.1 ± 2.7 | |
| 2010 | 131 | 7.9 ± 1.3 | 9.3 ± 2.7 | |
| 2011 | 94 | 6.5 ± 3.6 | 6.9 ± 2.7 | |
| 2012 | 59 | 3.1 ± 0.7 | 4.1 ± 1.0 | |
| 2013 | 42 | 3.5 ± 0.4 | 6.9 ± 3.7 | |
| Total | 866 | 7.31 | 6.73 | |
Abbreviations: HVL human visceral leishmaniasis, CanL canine leishmaniasis, PCP proportion of canine prevalence = positive dogs in ELISA and RIFI/ dogs evaluated, PMH proportion of monitoring hosts (dogs not euthanized by the health service) = positive dogs only in the ELISA/ dogs evaluated
aIn seven cases presented in the database, the sanitary district of origin was ignored
bUntil July2013; PMH and PCP: mean ± standard deviation
Time series and intervention models for HVL, PCP (%) and PMH (%) in Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil, 2006–2013
| Indicator | Variable | Coefficient | SE | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HVLa | Theta_1 | -1.03 | 0.05 | -19.53 | < 0.0001 |
| Theta_5 | -0.37 | 0.11 | -3.33 | < 0.0001 | |
| Theta_6 | 0.55 | 0.09 | 5.67 | < 0.0001 | |
| Dummy_jan_2008_3 | 0.28 | 0.09 | 3.09 | < 0.0001 | |
| Dummy_jan_2008_4 | -0.30 | 0.00 | -3.36 | < 0.0001 | |
| PCPb | Phi_1 | 0.62 | 0.08 | 7.20 | < 0.0001 |
| Theta_1 | -1.00 | 0.06 | -14.94 | < 0.0001 | |
| Dummy_jan_2011 | 0.68 | 0.24 | 2.82 | < 0.0001 | |
| Dummy_jan_2011_1 | -1.83 | 0.43 | -4.19 | < 0.0001 | |
| Dummy_jan_2011_2 | 1.13 | 0.25 | 4.49 | < 0.0001 | |
| PMHc | Phi_1 | 0.99 | 0.07 | 12.61 | < 0.0001 |
| Phi_3 | -0.18 | 0.08 | -2.25 | 0.02 | |
| Theta_1 | -1.49 | 0.03 | -39.96 | < 0.0001 | |
| Theta_3 | 0.49 | 0.03 | 13.19 | < 0.0001 | |
| Dummy_apr_2008 | 0.76 | 0.06 | 11.42 | < 0.0001 | |
| Dummy_aug_2009 | -6.87 | 1.36 | -5.04 | < 0.0001 | |
| Dummy_aug_2009_1 | 5.97 | 1.31 | 4.53 | < 0.0001 |
Abbreviations: HVL human visceral leishmaniasis, PCP proportion of canine prevalence = positive dogs in ELISA and RIFI/ dogs evaluated, PMH proportion of monitoring hosts (dogs not euthanized by the health service) = positive dogs only in the ELISA/ dogs evaluated; SE standard error
aHVL: Autoregressive integrated moving average model (ARIMA) (0, 1, 6) adjusted; Akaike information criterion: 103.40, Schwarz criterion: 118.19, and Hannan-Quinn criterion: 109.35
bPCP: ARIMA (1, 1, 1) adjusted; Akaike information criterion: 25.99, Schwarz criterion: 40.93, and Hannan-Quinn criterion: 32.01
cPMH:ARIMA (3, 1, 3) adjusted; Akaike information criterion: 425.40, Schwarz criterion: 445.40, and Hannan-Quinn criterion: 433.46
Dynamic relationship (VAR) between PCP (%)for CanL and incidence of HVL, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil, 2006–2013
| Independent variables | Dependent variables | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HVL | PCP | |||
| Coefficient | Coefficient | |||
| HVL_1 | -0.67 | < 0.0001 | -0.09 | 0.24 |
| HVL_2 | -0.35 | < 0.0001 | -0.03 | 0.68 |
| PCP_1 | -0.07 | 0.58 | -0.31 | < 0.0001 |
| PCP_2 | 0.27 | 0.03 | -0.18 | 0.09 |
|
| 0.39 | 0.11 | ||
| Adjusted | 0.37 | 0.08 | ||
| Durbin-Watson | 2.08 | 1.99 | ||
Abbreviations: VAR vector autoregressive model, HVL_1 human cases recorded a month later, HVL_2 human cases recorded two months later, PCP_1 proportion of canine seroprevalence recorded a month later, PCP_2 proportion of canine seroprevalence recorded two months later, HVL human visceral leishmaniasis, CanL canine leishmaniasis; PCP proportion of canine prevalence = positive dogs in ELISA and RIFI/ dogs evaluated
Dynamic relationship (VAR) between PMH (%) for CanL and incidence of HVL, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil, 2006–2013
| Independent variables | Dependent variables | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HVL | PMH | |||
| Coefficient | Coefficient | |||
| HVL_1 | -0.67 | < 0.0001 | 0.07 | 0.35 |
| HVL_2 | -0.30 | < 0.0001 | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| PMH_1 | -0.14 | 0.31 | -0.24 | 0.02 |
| PMH_2 | 0.30 | 0.04 | -0.19 | 0.08 |
|
| 0.40 | 0.13 | ||
| Adjusted | 0.38 | 0.09 | ||
| Durbin-Watson | 2.10 | 2.04 | ||
Abbreviations: VAR vector autoregressive model, HVL_1 human cases recorded a month later, HVL_2 human cases recorded two months later, PMH _1 proportion of monitoring hosts recorded a month later, PMH _2 proportion of canine monitoring hosts recorded two months later, HVL human visceral leishmaniasis, CanL canine leishmaniasis, PMH proportion of monitoring hosts (dogs not euthanized by the health service) = positive dogs only in the ELISA/ dogs evaluated
Fig. 2Distribution of canine leishmaniasis (CanL) and human visceral leishmaniasis (HVL) cases and deaths in Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil, 2006–2013. Cases of canine seropositivity according to the ELISA test and IIFT
Fig. 3Areas containing clusters (hot spot analysis) of canine leishmaniasis (CanL) and human visceral leishmaniasis (HVL), Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil, 2006 to 2013.Hot spot analysis was performed with the ArcGis 10.2.1 software. Red areas indicate clusters of high values (hot spots); blue areas indicate clusters of low values (cold spots). CanL cases according to the ELISA test and IIFT. a CanL cases recorded in 2007. b CanL cases recorded in 2008. c CanL cases recorded in 2010. d CanL cases recorded in 2011. e CanL cases recorded in 2013. f HVL cases recorded in 2006. g HVL cases recorded in 2009. h HVL cases recorded in 2013