Literature DB >> 29954230

Is failure to raise concerns about misconduct a breach of integrity? Researchers' reflections on reporting misconduct.

Priya Satalkar1, David Shaw1.   

Abstract

This article describes and discusses the views of researchers on the significance of raising concerns about scientific misconduct in their work environment and the reasons or circumstances that might deter them from doing so. In this exploratory qualitative research study, we conducted in-depth interviews with 33 researchers working in life sciences and medicine. They represent three seniority levels and five universities across Switzerland. A large majority of respondents in this research study argued that failure to raise concerns about scientific misconduct compromises research integrity. This is an encouraging result demonstrating that researchers try to adhere to high ethical standards. However, further interaction with respondents highlighted that this correct ethical assessment does not lead researchers to take the consequent action of raising concerns. The factors that discourage researchers from raising concerns need to be addressed at the level of research groups, institutions, and by setting a positive precedent which helps them to believe in the system's ability to investigate concerns raised in a timely and professional manner. Training of researchers in research integrity related issues will have limited utility unless it is coupled with the creation of research culture where raising concerns is a standard practice of scientific and research activities.

Keywords:  Barriers to reporting misconduct; RCR education and instruction; Raising concerns about misconduct; obligation to report misconduct; qualitative research; research integrity; research misconduct; responsible conduct of research; whistleblowing

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29954230     DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2018.1493577

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Account Res        ISSN: 0898-9621            Impact factor:   2.622


  4 in total

1.  How do researchers acquire and develop notions of research integrity? A qualitative study among biomedical researchers in Switzerland.

Authors:  Priya Satalkar; David Shaw
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 2.652

2.  Stakeholders' Experiences of Research Integrity Support in Universities: A Qualitative Study in Three European Countries.

Authors:  Natalie Evans; Ivan Buljan; Emanuele Valenti; Lex Bouter; Ana Marušić; Raymond de Vries; Guy Widdershoven
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 3.777

3.  Stakeholders' perspectives on research integrity training practices: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Daniel Pizzolato; Kris Dierickx
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 2.652

4.  How should researchers cope with the ethical demands of discovering research misconduct? Going beyond reporting and whistleblowing.

Authors:  Knut Jørgen Vie
Journal:  Life Sci Soc Policy       Date:  2020-08-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.