Literature DB >> 29954196

Risk factors for increased sagittal pelvic motion causing unfavourable orientation of the acetabular component in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty.

J Langston1, J Pierrepont2, Y Gu2, A Shimmin3.   

Abstract

Aims: It is important to consider sagittal pelvic rotation when introducing the acetabular component at total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of this study was to identify patients who are at risk of unfavourable pelvic mobility, which could result in poor outcomes after THA. Patients and
Methods: A consecutive series of 4042 patients undergoing THA had lateral functional radiographs and a low-dose CT scan to measure supine pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence, standing pelvic tilt, flexed-seated pelvic tilt, standing lumbar lordotic angle, flexed-seated lumbar lordotic angle, and lumbar flexion. Changes in pelvic tilt from supine-to-standing positions and supine-to-flexed-seated positions were determined. A change in pelvic tilt of 13° between positions was deemed unfavourable as it alters functional anteversion by 10° and effectively places the acetabular component outside the safe zone of orientation.
Results: For both men and women, the degree of lumbar flexion was a significant predictor of risk in hip flexion (p < 0.0001) with increased odds of unfavourable pelvic mobility in those with lumbar flexion of < 20° (men, odds ratio (OR) 6.74, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.83 to 11.89; women, OR 2.97, 95% CI 1.87 to 4.71). In women, age and standing pelvic tilt were significant predictors of risk in hip extension (p = 0.0082 and p < 0.0001, respectively). The risk of unfavourable pelvic mobility was higher in those aged > 75 years (OR 2.28, 95% CI 1.56 to 3.32) and those with standing pelvic tilt of < -10° for extension risk (OR 7.10, 95% CI 4.10 to 10.29). In men, only standing pelvic tilt was significant (p < 0.0001) for hip extension with an increased risk of unfavourable pelvic mobility (OR 8.68, 95% CI 5.19 to 14.51).
Conclusion: Patients found to have unfavourable pelvic mobility had limited lumbar flexion and more posterior standing pelvic tilt in both men and women, as well as increasing age in women. We recommend that patients undergo preoperative functional radiographic screening to determine specific parameters that can affect the functional orientation of the acetabular component. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:845-52.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Functional acetabular orientation; Sagittal pelvic mobility; Total hip arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29954196     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B7.BJJ-2017-1599.R1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  16 in total

1.  Can measurements from an anteroposterior radiograph predict pelvic sagittal inclination?

Authors:  Keisuke Uemura; Penny R Atkins; Masashi Okamoto; Kunihiko Tokunaga; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 3.494

2.  Low dislocation rates with the use of patient specific "Safe zones" in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Abhinav K Sharma; Zlatan Cizmic; Douglas A Dennis; Stefan W Kreuzer; Michael A Miranda; Jonathan M Vigdorchik
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-08-21

3.  Computer Navigation for Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Reduces Dislocation Rates.

Authors:  Abhinav K Sharma; Zlatan Cizmic; Kaitlin M Carroll; Seth A Jerabek; Wayne G Paprosky; Peter K Sculco; Alejandro Gonzalez Della Valle; Ran Schwarzkopf; David J Mayman; Jonathan M Vigdorchik
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 1.033

4.  Spinopelvic Mobility Pattern and Acetabular Anteversion in Stiff Hips With Ankylosing Spondylitis After Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Anil Thomas Oommen; Triplicane Dwarakanathan Hariharan; Madhavi Kandagaddala; Viruthipadavil John Chandy; Pradeep Mathew Poonnoose; A Arun Shankar
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2022-06-25

5.  Defining "Normal" Static and Dynamic Spinopelvic Characteristics: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Jeroen C F Verhaegen; Moritz Innmann; Nuno Alves Batista; Charles-Antoine Dion; Isabel Horton; Jim Pierrepont; Christian Merle; George Grammatopoulos
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2022-07-05

6.  Spinopelvic Hypermobility Corrects After Staged Bilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Eric N Windsor; Peter K Sculco; David J Mayman; Jonathan M Vigdorchik; Seth A Jerabek
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2021-11-02

7.  Digitalized analyses of intraoperative acetabular component position using image-matching technique in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Shinya Kawahara; Toshihiko Hara; Taishi Sato; Kazuki Kitade; Takeshi Shimoto; Tetsuro Nakamura; Taro Mawatari; Hidehiko Higaki; Yasuharu Nakashima
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 5.853

Review 8.  The Influence of Pelvic Tilt on the Anteversion Angle of the Acetabular Prosthesis.

Authors:  Guoyue Yang; Yayue Li; Hong Zhang
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.071

9.  Preoperative factors improving the prediction of the postoperative sagittal orientation of the pelvis in standing position after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Maximilian C M Fischer; Kunihiko Tokunaga; Masashi Okamoto; Juliana Habor; Klaus Radermacher
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Pelvic Tilt Angle Differences Between Symptom-Free Young Subjects and Elderly Patients Scheduled for THA: The Rationale for Tilt-Adjusted Acetabular Cup Implantation.

Authors:  Carlos J Marques; Tobias Martin; Andrzej Kochman; Adrian Goral; Frank Lampe; Viktor Breul; Josef Kozak
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2018-08-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.