| Literature DB >> 29954132 |
Shujuan Song1, Chunfeng Chen2, Aiguo Zhang3.
Abstract
In the rural areas of China, there is a high occurrence of parental migration, wherein adults are flushed into urban areas to search for employment opportunities, leading to millions of left-behind children (LBC) in rural China. LBC attracts more attention from the social community and Chinese government. Here, we compared the life satisfaction and academic achievement of left-behind children (LBC) and non-left-behind children (NLBC) in rural regions that send out migrant labor in Hubei province, central China. We investigated 1031 LBC and 992 NLBC students in grades 4 to 9 in ten elementary and four middle schools, using a structured questionnaire including sociodemographic characteristics, life satisfaction, and academic achievement scores. The results showed that LBC have a lower life satisfaction and lower academic achievement than NLBC (p < 0.01). Meanwhile, as the child&rsquo;s age at separation from parents decreased, their life satisfaction decreased. Additionally, correlations were observed between life satisfaction and academic achievement scores in LBC (p = 0.004) as well as in NLBC (p = 0.064). Collectively, these findings provide novel insights into a comprehensive understanding of LBC and suggest that the life satisfaction levels of LBC should be improved in rural China.Entities:
Keywords: academic achievement; left-behind children; life satisfaction; parental migration; rural China
Year: 2018 PMID: 29954132 PMCID: PMC6069392 DOI: 10.3390/children5070087
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Children (Basel) ISSN: 2227-9067
Description of the participant characteristics in this study.
| Number ( | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | Overall | LBC | NLBC | χ2 |
| |||
| 100% | 51% | 49% | 0.752 | 0.386 | ||||
|
| ||||||||
| Male | 100% | 50.9% | 49.1% | 0.580 | 0.446 | |||
| Female | 100% | 50.7% | 49.3% | 0.227 | 0.634 | |||
|
| ||||||||
| Grade 4 | 100% | 48.2% | 51.8% | 0.315 | 0.575 | |||
| Grade 5 | 100% | 55.2% | 44.8% | 2.683 | 0.101 | |||
| Grade 6 | 100% | 48.6% | 51.4% | 0.246 | 0.620 | |||
| Grade 7 | 100% | 56.3% | 43.8% | 8.124 | 0.004 | |||
| Grade 8 | 100% | 50.3% | 49.7% | 0.089 | 0.766 | |||
| Grade 9 | 100% | 46.8% | 53.2% | 0.836 | 0.175 | |||
|
| ||||||||
| Elementary school (grades 4–6) | 100% | 50.5% | 49.5% | 0.076 | 0.782 | |||
| Middle school (grades 7–9) | 100% | 51.0% | 49.0% | 1.030 | 0.310 | |||
Note. LBC and NLBC represent left-behind children and non-left-behind children, respectively. The number of gender is less than the total participants’ number because some children did not report their gender data. p < 0.05 is considered significant.
Comparison of life satisfaction of left-behind children (LBC) and non-left behind children (NLBC) in rural China.
| Variable | LBC (M, SD) ( | NLBC (M, SD) ( |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 20.98, 6.273 | 21.66, 5.877 | 2.498 | 0.013 |
|
| ||||
| Male | 20.99, 6.313 | 21.56, 5.975 | 1.460 | 0.145 |
| Female | 21.05, 6.264 | 21.79, 5.772 | 1.910 | 0.056 |
|
| ||||
| Grade 4 | 22.14, 5.623 | 22.75, 5.245 | 0.907 | 0.365 |
| Grade 5 | 22.74, 7.324 | 22.50, 6.235 | -0.272 | 0.786 |
| Grade 6 | 20.64, 6.467 | 21.64, 6.504 | 1.400 | 0.162 |
| Grade 7 | 20.59, 5.993 | 21.51, 5.332 | 2.277 | 0.023 |
| Grade 8 | 20.43, 5.450 | 21.71, 5.246 | 2.385 | 0.018 |
| Grade 9 | 20.07, 5.990 | 20.67, 6.317 | 0.968 | 0.334 |
|
| ||||
| Elementary school (grades 4–6) | 21.77, 6.584 | 22.23, 6.058 | 1.059 | 0.290 |
| Middle school (grades 7–9) | 20.43, 5.992 | 21.24, 5.712 | 2.380 | 0.017 |
Note. Data are expressed as means (M) and standard deviations (SD). LBC and NLBC represent left-behind children and non-left-behind children, respectively. p < 0.05 was considered significant.
Comparison of academic achievement of left-behind children (LBC) and non-left behind children (NLBC) in rural China.
| Variable | LBC (M, SD) ( | NLBC (M, SD) ( |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 206.39, 60.925 | 212.79, 59.612 | 2.392 | 0.017 |
|
| ||||
| Male | 207.71, 60.385 | 212.49, 58.254 | 1.276 | 0.202 |
| Female | 205.00, 60.954 | 213.61, 61.073 | 2.224 | 0.026 |
|
| ||||
| Grade 4 | 197.86, 58.272 | 203.32, 57.335 | 0.756 | 0.450 |
| Grade 5 | 196.94, 58.030 | 206.21, 62.662 | 1.217 | 0.225 |
| Grade 6 | 198.88, 64.010 | 204.72, 63.429 | 0.830 | 0.407 |
| Grade 7 | 211.96, 62.405 | 219.30, 57.932 | 1.178 | 0.240 |
| Grade 8 | 208.09, 60.141 | 216.39, 56.108 | 1.438 | 0.151 |
| Grade 9 | 217.13, 59.288 | 220.23, 59.463 | 0.518 | 0.605 |
|
| ||||
| Elementary school (grades 4–6) | 197.94, 60.592 | 204.68, 60.294 | 1.604 | 0.109 |
| Middle school (grades 7–9) | 212.22, 60.724 | 218.63, 57.803 | 1.863 | 0.063 |
Note. Data are expressed as means (M) and standard deviations (SD). LBC and NLBC represent left-behind children and non-left-behind children, respectively. p < 0.05 was considered significant.
Comparison of the life satisfaction and academic achievement of left-behind children (LBC) in rural China.
| Variable | Life Satisfaction (M, SD) | Academic Achievement (M, SD) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Separation age | Aged < 3 | 20.30, 6.644 | 205.76, 60.985 |
| ( | |||
| 3 < Aged < 6 | 21.10, 6.141 | 197.02, 59.898 | |
| ( | |||
| Aged > 6 | 21.80, 5.948 | 211.19, 61.221 | |
| ( | |||
| One-way ANOVA | 3.900 * | 3.891 * | |
Note. Separation age means the age of the children at separation from parents. Data are expressed as means (M) and standard deviations (SD). LBC and NLBC represent left-behind children and non-left-behind children, respectively. * p < 0.05.
Figure 1The relationship between life satisfaction and academic achievement of (A) non-left-behind children and (B) left-behind children (LBC) in rural China (n = 2031).