Literature DB >> 29954048

Translating the ICAP Theory of Cognitive Engagement Into Practice.

Michelene T H Chi1, Joshua Adams1, Emily B Bogusch2, Christiana Bruchok1, Seokmin Kang3, Matthew Lancaster4, Roy Levy5, Na Li6, Katherine L McEldoon7, Glenda S Stump8, Ruth Wylie9, Dongchen Xu10, David L Yaghmourian11.   

Abstract

ICAP is a theory of active learning that differentiates students' engagement based on their behaviors. ICAP postulates that Interactive engagement, demonstrated by co-generative collaborative behaviors, is superior for learning to Constructive engagement, indicated by generative behaviors. Both kinds of engagement exceed the benefits of Active or Passive engagement, marked by manipulative and attentive behaviors, respectively. This paper discusses a 5-year project that attempted to translate ICAP into a theory of instruction using five successive measures: (a) teachers' understanding of ICAP after completing an online module, (b) their success at designing lesson plans using different ICAP modes, (c) fidelity of teachers' classroom implementation, (d) modes of students' enacted behaviors, and (e) students' learning outcomes. Although teachers had minimal success in designing Constructive and Interactive activities, students nevertheless learned significantly more in the context of Constructive than Active activities. We discuss reasons for teachers' overall difficulty in designing and eliciting Interactive engagement.
Copyright © 2018 Cognitive Science Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Active learning; Co-constructive learning; Cognitive engagement; Collaborative learning; Constructive learning

Year:  2018        PMID: 29954048     DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12626

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Sci        ISSN: 0364-0213


  8 in total

1.  Facing Disruptive Changes With Informal Workplace Learning Strategies: The Experience of European Companies.

Authors:  Francesca Amenduni; Essi Ryymin; Katja Maetoloa; Alberto Cattaneo
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-05-26

2.  A Decision Tree Based Methodology for Evaluating Creativity in Engineering Design.

Authors:  Trina C Kershaw; Sankha Bhowmick; Carolyn Conner Seepersad; Katja Hölttä-Otto
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-01-25

3.  Cognitive Loading and Knowledge Hiding in Art Design Education: Cognitive Engagement as Mediator and Supervisor Support as Moderator.

Authors:  Tao Gao; Lihong Kuang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-02-25

4.  Highly Engaged Video-Watching Pattern in Asynchronous Online Pharmacology Course in Pre-clinical 4th-Year Medical Students Was Associated With a Good Self-Expectation, Understanding, and Performance.

Authors:  Jann-Yuan Wang; Chia-Hsien Yang; Wei-Chih Liao; Kai-Chien Yang; I-Wen Chang; Bor-Ching Sheu; Yen-Hsuan Ni
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-01-21

5.  Teaching PSE mastery during, and after, the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Daniel R Lewin
Journal:  Comput Chem Eng       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 3.845

6.  The two envelopes method for active learning.

Authors:  Moshe Y Flugelman; Robert M Glueck; Doron Aronson; Avinoam Shiran
Journal:  GMS J Med Educ       Date:  2022-07-15

7.  Scalable Science Education via Online Cooperative Questioning.

Authors:  Courtney B Hilton; Micah B Goldwater; Dale Hancock; Matthew Clemson; Alice Huang; Gareth Denyer
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 3.955

8.  Interactions between emotional and cognitive engagement with science on YouTube.

Authors:  Ilana Dubovi; Iris Tabak
Journal:  Public Underst Sci       Date:  2021-02-05
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.