Literature DB >> 29953742

Relationship of Joint Hypermobility with Ankle and Foot Radiographic Osteoarthritis and Symptoms in a Community-Based Cohort.

Yvonne M Golightly1, Marian T Hannan2, Amanda E Nelson1, Howard J Hillstrom3, Rebecca J Cleveland1, Virginia B Kraus4, Todd A Schwartz1, Adam P Goode4, Portia Flowers1, Jordan B Renner1, Joanne M Jordan1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore associations of joint hypermobility (a condition where range of motion is greater than normal) with ankle and foot radiographic osteoarthritis (OA) and symptoms in a large community-based cohort of African American and white adults ages 55-94 years old.
METHODS: Ankle and foot radiographs and joint hypermobility data (Beighton score for joint hypermobility criteria) were available for 848 participants (from 2003 to 2010) in this cross-sectional study. General joint hypermobility was defined as a Beighton score ≥4 (range 0-9); knee hypermobility was defined as hyperextension of at least 1 knee. Standing anteroposterior and lateral foot radiographs were read with standard atlases for Kellgren-Lawrence grade, osteophytes, and joint space narrowing (JSN) at the tibiotalar joint, and for osteophytes and JSN to define OA at 5 foot joints. Ankle or foot symptoms were self-reported. Separate person-based logistic regression models were used to estimate associations of ankle and foot OA and symptom outcomes with hypermobility measures, adjusting for age, sex, race, body mass index, and history of ankle/foot injury.
RESULTS: This sample cohort included 577 women (68%) and 280 African Americans (33%). The mean age of the participants was 71 years, with a mean body mass index of 31 kg/m2 . The general joint hypermobility of the participants was 7% and knee hypermobility was 4%. Having a history of ankle injury was 11.5%, and foot injury was 3.8%. Although general joint hypermobility was not associated with ankle and foot outcomes, knee hypermobility was associated with ankle symptoms, foot symptoms, and talonavicular OA (adjusted odds ratios of 4.4, 2.4, and 3.0, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Knee joint hypermobility may be related to talonavicular OA and to ankle and foot symptoms.
© 2018, American College of Rheumatology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 29953742      PMCID: PMC6310667          DOI: 10.1002/acr.23686

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)        ISSN: 2151-464X            Impact factor:   5.178


  36 in total

1.  Articular mobility in Maori and European New Zealanders.

Authors:  P Klemp; S M Williams; S A Stansfield
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 7.580

2.  Intrarater and Interrater Reliability of the Beighton and Horan Joint Mobility Index.

Authors:  Kyndall L. Boyle; Philip Witt; Cheryl Riegger-Krugh
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Prevalence and features of joint hypermobility among adolescent athletes.

Authors:  L C Decoster; J C Vailas; R H Lindsay; G R Williams
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  1997-10

4.  Prevalence of knee symptoms and radiographic and symptomatic knee osteoarthritis in African Americans and Caucasians: the Johnston County Osteoarthritis Project.

Authors:  Joanne M Jordan; Charles G Helmick; Jordan B Renner; Gheorghe Luta; Anca D Dragomir; Janice Woodard; Fang Fang; Todd A Schwartz; Lauren M Abbate; Leigh F Callahan; William D Kalsbeek; Marc C Hochberg
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.666

5.  The benign hypermobile joint syndrome.

Authors:  E F Jessee; D S Owen; K B Sagar
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1980-09

Review 6.  Impact of joint laxity and hypermobility on the musculoskeletal system.

Authors:  Jennifer Moriatis Wolf; Kenneth L Cameron; Brett D Owens
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.020

7.  Inter-examiner reproducibility of tests and criteria for generalized joint hypermobility and benign joint hypermobility syndrome.

Authors:  B Juul-Kristensen; H Røgind; D V Jensen; L Remvig
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 7.580

8.  Joint mobility with particular reference to racial variation and inherited connective tissue disorders.

Authors:  P Wordsworth; D Ogilvie; R Smith; B Sykes
Journal:  Br J Rheumatol       Date:  1987-02

9.  Demographic and clinical factors associated with radiographic severity of first metatarsophalangeal joint osteoarthritis: cross-sectional findings from the Clinical Assessment Study of the Foot.

Authors:  H B Menz; E Roddy; M Marshall; M J Thomas; T Rathod; H Myers; E Thomas; G M Peat
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 6.576

10.  Association between general joint hypermobility and knee, hip, and lumbar spine osteoarthritis by race: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Portia P E Flowers; Rebecca J Cleveland; Todd A Schwartz; Amanda E Nelson; Virginia B Kraus; Howard J Hillstrom; Adam P Goode; Marian T Hannan; Jordan B Renner; Joanne M Jordan; Yvonne M Golightly
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 5.156

View more
  2 in total

1.  Joint hypermobility is not positively associated with prevalent multiple joint osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional study of older adults.

Authors:  Terese R Gullo; Yvonne M Golightly; Portia Flowers; Joanne M Jordan; Jordan B Renner; Todd A Schwartz; Virginia B Kraus; Marian T Hannan; Rebecca J Cleveland; Amanda E Nelson
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 2.362

2.  Incidence and progression of ankle osteoarthritis: The johnston county osteoarthritis project.

Authors:  Ayesha Jaleel; Yvonne M Golightly; Carolina Alvarez; Jordan B Renner; Amanda E Nelson
Journal:  Semin Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 5.532

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.