| Literature DB >> 29953414 |
Chih-Yang Huang1,2, Chia-Hua Kuo3, Chi Yang3, Ying Jiao4, Bing Wei4, Zeyi Yang4, Jin-Fu Wu3, Jorgen Jensen5, Wei-Horng Jean3,6.
Abstract
It remains unclear how exercise, as an entropic event, brings benefit against human aging. Here we examined longitudinal changes of p16Ink4a+ senescent cells in skeletal muscle of young men (aged 22.5±1.7 y) before and after resistance exercise (0 h and 48 h) with multiple biopsies at two different protein availabilities: low protein (14%) and isocaloric high protein (44%) supplemented conditions. Immunohistochemistry analysis of muscle cross-sections using p16Ink4a and CD34 antibodies confirmed that the detected senescent cells were endothelial progenitor cells. Leukocyte infiltration into skeletal muscle increased during resistance exercise. The senescent cells in muscle decreased (-48%, P < 0.01) after exercise for 48 h. Low protein supplementation resulted in greater infiltrations of both CD68+ phagocytic macrophage and leukocyte, further decreased p16Ink4a+ senescent cells (-73%, P < 0.001), and delayed increases in regenerative CD163+ macrophage in skeletal muscle, compared with high protein supplemented condition. Significant gain in muscle mass after 12 weeks of training occurred only under high protein supplemented condition.Entities:
Keywords: anti-aging; inflammation; macrophage; p16Ink4a; whey protein
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29953414 PMCID: PMC6046228 DOI: 10.18632/aging.101472
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Aging (Albany NY) ISSN: 1945-4589 Impact factor: 5.682
Figure 1Leukocyte infiltration in human skeletal muscle after resistance exercise. (A) Representative hematoxylin and eosin staining of a muscle cross-section (leukocytes infiltration indicated by an arrow). (B) Resistance exercise immediately increased leukocyte infiltration into skeletal muscle. High protein supplementation before and after resistance exercise attenuated exercise-induced leukocyte infiltration. * Significant difference against Baseline, P < 0.05; † Significant difference against Low Protein, P < 0.05. Low protein: 14% protein; High protein: 44% protein in weight.
Figure 2Senescent endothelial progenitor cells (p16 (A) Representative immunohistochemical co-staining of muscle cross-sections (senescent cells indicated by arrows). Scale bar 550 mm. (B) Senescent endothelial progenitor cells decreased in human skeletal muscle after a single bout of resistance exercise, and to a greater extends under low protein supplemented condition. * Significant difference against Baseline, P < 0.05; † Significant difference against Low Protein, P < 0.05. Low protein: 14% protein; High protein: 44% protein in weight.
Figure 3Phagocytic macrophage (CD68 (A) Representative immunohistochemical staining of a muscle cross-section (CD68+ macrophage indicated by an arrow). Scale bar 550 mm. (B) Low protein supplementation before and after resistance exercise enhanced CD68+ macrophage infiltration in skeletal muscle above High protein trial. * Significant difference against Baseline, P < 0.05; † Significant difference against Low Protein, P < 0.05. Low protein: 14% protein; High protein: 44% protein in weight.
Figure 4Regenerative macrophage (CD163 (A) Representative immunohistochemical staining of a muscle cross-section (CD163+ macrophage indicated by an arrow). Scale bar 550 mm. (B) High protein supplementation before and after resistance exercise increased CD163+ macrophage presence in human skeletal muscle 48 h after exercise. * Significant difference against Baseline, P < 0.05; † Significant difference against Low Protein, P < 0.05. Low protein: 14% protein; High protein: 44% protein in weight.
Figure 5Centrally nucleated fibers in human skeletal muscle after resistance exercise. (A) Representative hematoxylin and eosin staining of a muscle cross-section (centrally nucleated fibers indicated by arrows). Scale bar 550 mm. (B) (††) No difference between Low and High protein trials was found. * Significant difference against Baseline, P < 0.05. Low protein: 14% protein; High protein: 44% protein in weight.
Muscle mass increment of young adults after 12 weeks of resistance training.
| Low Protein (14%) | High Protein (44%) | |||||
| Unit: Kg | Pre | Post | Change | Pre | Post | Change |
| Muscle mass | 54.8±1.4 | 55.1±1.5 | +0.40 | 56.6±1.3 | 57.7±1.1 | +1.08 ** |
| Fat mass | 12.5±1.1 | 12.9±1.1 | +0.38 | 14.3±1.6 | 14.7±1.7 | +0.41 |
| Body weight | 70.3±2.1 | 71.1±2.2 | +0.79 | 74.1±2.9 | 75.6±2.6 | +1.49 |
Significantly muscle mass increment observed only under high protein supplemented condition. Muscle mass (bone-free lean mass) was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. ** Significant difference against Pre, P < 0.01. Low protein: 14% protein; High protein: 44% protein in weight.
Baseline characteristics of participants. Low protein: 14% protein; High protein: 44% protein in weight.
| Study 1 | Crossover design (N = 12) | |
| Age (y) | 22.5±1.7 | |
| Weight (kg) | 68.8±12.1 | |
| Height (cm) | 171.1±6.9 | |
| Years engaged in sports | > 3 y | |
| Study 2 | Parallel design | |
| Group | High Protein (N = 13) | Low Protein (N = 13) |
| Age (y) | 21.4±0.2 | 21.4±0.2 |
| Weight (kg) | 74.1±2.9 | 70.3±2.1 |
| Height (cm) | 174.6±1.7 | 172±1.5 |
| Years engaged in sports | > 3 y | > 3 y |