Lotte Rasmussen1, Nicole Pratt2, Morten Rix Hansen1,3, Jesper Hallas1,3, Anton Pottegård1. 1. Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, DK-5000, Odense, Denmark. 2. Quality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre, Sansom Institute for Health Research, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia. 3. Department of Clinical Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Standard Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival analysis is often used to study treatment persistence estimating the proportion of patients who have not yet experienced a treatment break by a given day after treatment initiation. This method only allows patients to be studied until their first treatment break. The "proportion of patients covered" (PPC) method is another approach to study treatment persistence. It measures the proportion of live patients currently covered by treatment. We aimed to describe the PPC method, show how the KM survival analysis and the PPC method can describe treatment persistence, and discuss the interpretation/application of the methods. METHODS: We identified new users of statins, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, hormone replacement therapy, and ibuprofen. We used KM estimates and the PPC to describe persistence in the 3 years post treatment initiation, using a grace period of 90 days to define a treatment break. RESULTS: Three years after statin initiation, approximately 40% of patients were still in continuous treatment (KM survival) and 60% of patients still alive were in current treatment (PPC). Corresponding numbers were 12% and 25% for selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and 9% and 29% for hormone replacement therapy. At 1 year, numbers were 5% and 10% for ibuprofen. The PPC showed markedly less variability than the KM survival analysis with different choices of grace periods. CONCLUSIONS: The KM survival analysis and the PPC method can be used to study different aspects of treatment persistence. Together, they provide a more complete picture of treatment persistence and drug use patterns.
PURPOSE: Standard Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival analysis is often used to study treatment persistence estimating the proportion of patients who have not yet experienced a treatment break by a given day after treatment initiation. This method only allows patients to be studied until their first treatment break. The "proportion of patients covered" (PPC) method is another approach to study treatment persistence. It measures the proportion of live patients currently covered by treatment. We aimed to describe the PPC method, show how the KM survival analysis and the PPC method can describe treatment persistence, and discuss the interpretation/application of the methods. METHODS: We identified new users of statins, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, hormone replacement therapy, and ibuprofen. We used KM estimates and the PPC to describe persistence in the 3 years post treatment initiation, using a grace period of 90 days to define a treatment break. RESULTS: Three years after statin initiation, approximately 40% of patients were still in continuous treatment (KM survival) and 60% of patients still alive were in current treatment (PPC). Corresponding numbers were 12% and 25% for selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and 9% and 29% for hormone replacement therapy. At 1 year, numbers were 5% and 10% for ibuprofen. The PPC showed markedly less variability than the KM survival analysis with different choices of grace periods. CONCLUSIONS: The KM survival analysis and the PPC method can be used to study different aspects of treatment persistence. Together, they provide a more complete picture of treatment persistence and drug use patterns.
Authors: Joris J Komen; Eibert R Heerdink; Olaf H Klungel; Aukje K Mantel-Teeuwisse; Tomas Forslund; Björn Wettermark; Paul Hjemdahl Journal: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother Date: 2021-04-09
Authors: Donica Janzen; Reece Ramkissoon; James M Bolton; Christine Leong; I Fan Kuo; Silvia Alessi-Severini Journal: Drugs Real World Outcomes Date: 2022-05-16
Authors: Mikkel B Christensen; Espen Jimenez-Solem; Martin T Ernst; Morten Schmidt; Anton Pottegård; Erik L Grove Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-06-30 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Joris J Komen; Anton Pottegård; Aukje K Mantel-Teeuwisse; Tomas Forslund; Paul Hjemdahl; Björn Wettermark; Maja Hellfritzsch; Jesper Hallas; Morten Olesen; Marion Bennie; Tanja Mueller; Annemarie Voss; Tania Schink; Ulrike Haug; Bianca Kollhorst; Øystein Karlstad; Lars J Kjerpeseth; Olaf H Klungel Journal: Europace Date: 2021-11-08 Impact factor: 5.214