Literature DB >> 29951904

Training children aged 5-10 years in compliance control: tracing smaller figures yields better learning not specific to the scale of drawn figures.

Winona Snapp-Childs1, Aaron J Fath1, Geoffrey P Bingham2.   

Abstract

Previously we developed a method that supports active movement generation to allow practice with improvement of good compliance control in tracing and drawing. We showed that the method allowed children with motor impairments to improve at a 3D tracing task to become as proficient as typically developing children and that the training improved 2D figure copying. In this study, we expanded the training protocol to include a wider variety of ages (5-10-year-olds) and we made the figures traced in training the same as in figure copying, but varied the scale of training and copying figures to assess the generality of learning. Forty-eight children were assigned to groups trained using large or small figures. All were tested before training with a tracing task and a copying task. Then, the children trained over five sessions in the tracing task with either small or large figures. Finally, the tracing and copying tasks were tested again following training. A mean speed measure was used to control for path length variations in the timed task. Performance on both tasks at both baseline and posttest varied as a function of the size of the figure and age. In addition, tracing performance also varied with the level of support. In particular, speeds were higher with more support, larger figures and older children. After training, performance improved. Speeds increased. In tracing, performance improved more for large figures traced by children who trained on large figures. In copying, however, performance only improved significantly for children who had trained on small figures and it improved equally for large and small figures. In conclusion, training by tracing smaller figures yielded better learning that was not, however, specific to the scale of drawn figures. Small figures exhibit greater mean curvature. We infer that it yielded better general improvement.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Compliance control; Manual control; Motor development; Prospective control; Specificity

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29951904     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-018-5319-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  18 in total

1.  Handwriting instruction in elementary schools.

Authors:  Asha V Asher
Journal:  Am J Occup Ther       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug

2.  Letter processing in the visual system: different activation patterns for single letters and strings.

Authors:  Karin H James; Thomas W James; Gael Jobard; Alan C N Wong; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Motor constancy and the upsizing of handwriting.

Authors:  James G Phillips; Rowan P Ogeil; Christopher Best
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2009-08-08       Impact factor: 2.161

4.  How we control the contraction of our muscles.

Authors:  P A Merton
Journal:  Sci Am       Date:  1972-05       Impact factor: 2.142

5.  Progressive reduction versus fixed level of support during training: When less is less.

Authors:  Winona Snapp-Childs; Xiaoye Michael Wang; Geoffrey P Bingham
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 2.161

6.  A sensorimotor approach to the training of manual actions in children with developmental coordination disorder.

Authors:  Winona Snapp-Childs; Mark Mon-Williams; Geoffrey P Bingham
Journal:  J Child Neurol       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 1.987

7.  Psychometric properties of the revised Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire.

Authors:  Brenda N Wilson; Susan G Crawford; Dido Green; Gwen Roberts; Alice Aylott; Bonnie J Kaplan
Journal:  Phys Occup Ther Pediatr       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.360

8.  A new tool for assessing human movement: the Kinematic Assessment Tool.

Authors:  Peter R Culmer; Martin C Levesley; Mark Mon-Williams; Justin H G Williams
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 2.390

9.  Training compliance control yields improvements in drawing as a function of Beery scores.

Authors:  Winona Snapp-Childs; Ian Flatters; Aaron Fath; Mark Mon-Williams; Geoffrey P Bingham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Brain activation patterns resulting from learning letter forms through active self-production and passive observation in young children.

Authors:  Alyssa J Kersey; Karin H James
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-09-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.