Literature DB >> 29951753

Quantifying insightful problem solving: a modified compound remote associates paradigm using lexical priming to parametrically modulate different sources of task difficulty.

Maxi Becker1, Gregor Wiedemann2, Simone Kühn3.   

Abstract

Insight problem solving has been conceptualized as a dynamic search through a constrained search space, where a non-obvious solution needs to be found. Multiple sources of task difficulty have been defined that can keep the problem solver from finding the right solution such as an overly large search space or knowledge constraints requiring a change of the problem representation. Up to now, there are very few accounts that focus on different aspects of difficulty within an insight problem-solving context and how they affect task performance as well as the probability of finding a solution that is accompanied by an Aha! experience. In addition, we are not aware of any approaches investigating how knowledge constraints parametrically modulate task performance and the Aha! experience in compound remote associates (CRA) when controlling for other sources of task difficulty. Therefore, we first developed, tested, and externally validated a modified CRA paradigm in combination with lexical priming that is more likely to elicit representational change than the classical CRA tasks. Second, we parametrically estimated the effect of the knowledge constraint together with other sources of difficulty (size of the problem and search space, word length and frequency) using general linear mixed models. The knowledge constraint (and the size of the search space) was operationalized as lexical distance (measured as cosine distances) between different word pairs within this task. Our results indicate that the experimentally induced knowledge constraint still affects task performance and is negatively related to the Aha! experience when controlling for various other types of task difficulties. Finally, we will present the complete stimulus set in German language together with their statistical (i.e., item difficulty and mean solution time) and lexical properties.

Year:  2018        PMID: 29951753     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-018-1042-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  32 in total

1.  Normative data for 144 compound remote associate problems.

Authors:  Edward M Bowden; Mark Jung-Beeman
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  2003-11

2.  Dynamics and constraints in insight problem solving.

Authors:  Thomas C Ormerod; James N MacGregor; Edward P Chronicle
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 3.  Studying insight problem solving with neuroscientific methods.

Authors:  Jing Luo; Guenther Knoblich
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.608

4.  The dynamics of search, impasse, and representational change provide a coherent explanation of difficulty in the nine-dot problem.

Authors:  Michael Öllinger; Gary Jones; Günther Knoblich
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-05-25

5.  Automatic and directed search processes in solving simple semantic-memory problems.

Authors:  H Ben-Zur
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1989-09

6.  Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations.

Authors:  D E Meyer; R W Schvaneveldt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1971-10

Review 7.  Once more with feeling: Normative data for the aha experience in insight and noninsight problems.

Authors:  Margaret E Webb; Daniel R Little; Simon J Cropper
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2018-10

8.  Insight Is Not in the Problem: Investigating Insight in Problem Solving across Task Types.

Authors:  Margaret E Webb; Daniel R Little; Simon J Cropper
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-09-26

9.  Neural activity when people solve verbal problems with insight.

Authors:  Mark Jung-Beeman; Edward M Bowden; Jason Haberman; Jennifer L Frymiare; Stella Arambel-Liu; Richard Greenblatt; Paul J Reber; John Kounios
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2004-04-13       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Insightful Imagery is Related to Working Memory Updating.

Authors:  Edward Nęcka; Piotr Żak; Aleksandra Gruszka
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-02-29
View more
  6 in total

1.  Uncovering neural distinctions and commodities between two creativity subsets: A meta-analysis of fMRI studies in divergent thinking and insight using activation likelihood estimation.

Authors:  Changyi Kuang; Jun Chen; Jiawen Chen; Yafei Shi; Huiyuan Huang; Bingqing Jiao; Qiwen Lin; Yuyang Rao; Wenting Liu; Yunpeng Zhu; Lei Mo; Lijun Ma; Jiabao Lin
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 5.399

2.  How Difficult Was It? Metacognitive Judgments About Problems and Their Solutions After the Aha Moment.

Authors:  Nadezhda V Moroshkina; Alina I Savina; Artur V Ammalainen; Valeria A Gershkovich; Ilia V Zverev; Olga V Lvova
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-06-22

3.  Assessing creativity independently of language: A language-independent remote associate task (LI-RAT).

Authors:  Maxi Becker; Roberto Cabeza
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-03-10

4.  Inferior frontal gyrus involvement during search and solution in verbal creative problem solving: A parametric fMRI study.

Authors:  Maxi Becker; Tobias Sommer; Simone Kühn
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-10-19       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Verbal insight revisited: fMRI evidence for early processing in bilateral insulae for solutions with AHA! experience shortly after trial onset.

Authors:  Maxi Becker; Tobias Sommer; Simone Kühn
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-09-14       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Naming unrelated words predicts creativity.

Authors:  Jay A Olson; Johnny Nahas; Denis Chmoulevitch; Simon J Cropper; Margaret E Webb
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 11.205

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.