Literature DB >> 29951752

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-, epidermal growth factor receptor-, and mesenchymal epithelial transition factor-positive sites of gastric cancer using surgical samples.

Yasuhiro Oono1, Takeshi Kuwata2, Kenji Takashima3, Kensuke Shinmura3, Keisuke Hori3, Yusuke Yoda3, Hiroaki Ikematsu3, Kohei Shitara4, Takahiro Kinoshita5, Tomonori Yano3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) play critical roles in gastric cancer (GC) progression and are potential targets for novel molecular-targeted agents or photo-immunotherapies. During patient selection, targeted biopsy is the first step. However, heterogeneous expression of RTKs based on the macroscopic appearance in GC has not been extensively addressed. Accordingly, in this study, we evaluated differences in RTK expression associated with macroscopic appearance in GC.
METHODS: In total, 375 consecutive patients who had undergone gastrectomy at the National Cancer Center Hospital East and who had histologically proven adenocarcinoma, available archived tumor sample, and no history of chemotherapy were enrolled in this study. For these cases, tissue microarray (TMA) samples were examined using immunohistochemistry (IHC). Based on the results of IHC, cases were selected for detailed examination. We re-evaluated IHC scores in more than three tumor blocks per case and comparatively evaluated differences in IHC expression in RTKs between the mucosal portion (MuP) and invasive portion (InP).
RESULTS: Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-, and mesenchymal epithelial transition factor (c-MET)-positive rates were 6, 9, and 20%, respectively. Twenty-two cases were then analyzed to assess differences in IHC expression levels in the same lesion. Concordance rates of positive staining of HER2, EGFR, and MET between MuP and whole tumor were 100, 40, and 56% and those with InP were 46, 100, and 56%.
CONCLUSIONS: To avoid underestimating expression status, biopsies must be taken from MuP for HER2, InP for EGFR, and both proportions for c-MET.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Epidermal growth factor receptor; Gastric cancer; Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; Mesenchymal epithelial transition factor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29951752     DOI: 10.1007/s10120-018-0853-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastric Cancer        ISSN: 1436-3291            Impact factor:   7.370


  2 in total

1.  Correlation between the overexpression of epidermal growth factor receptor and pathological features of gastric cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fan Cui; Xi Zhang
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 1.241

2.  Comparison of Treatment Efficacy and Survival Outcomes Between Asian and Western Patients With Unresectable Gastric or Gastro-Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Zhening Zhang; Zining Liu; Zeyang Chen
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 6.244

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.