| Literature DB >> 29951474 |
Xiu-Xia Luo1, Yongsheng Zhu1, Yiqian Sun1, Quanrong Ge1, Jin Su1, Hung-Kwan So2, Man-Ching Yam3, Fang Fang4.
Abstract
Objectives: Masked hypertension (MH) is not uncommon in the youth and may increase risks of long-term cardiovascular impairment. However, little is known about the subclinical heart damage in this group of patients. Currently, 3-layer speckle tracking imaging based on two-dimensional echocardiography is feasible to detect the early signs of myocardial damage. We therefore aimed to investigate whether subtle changes of cardiac function occurred in the young MH patients by using advanced quantification with layer-specific speckle tracking.Entities:
Keywords: layer-specific speckle tracking analysis; left ventricular function; masked hypertension; two-dimensional echocardiography; youth
Year: 2018 PMID: 29951474 PMCID: PMC6008558 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2018.00167
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pediatr ISSN: 2296-2360 Impact factor: 3.418
Figure 1Representative layer-specific longitudinal strain (LS) analyses in apical three-chamber view. The upper row, from left to right panel (A–D), showed the endocardial, mid-myocardial and epicardial layer as well as global mid-myocardial LS results respectively in an individual from the control group, while the lower row (E–H) showed the corresponding LS values in a young patient with masked hypertension. Significantly reduced values of LS for all myocardial layers were presented in the patient.
Clinical characteristics.
| Ages, years | 18.3 ± 2.9 | 18.0 ± 2.6 | 0.656 |
| Male, | 29 (73) | 29 (73) | 1.000 |
| Height, cm | 168 ± 9 | 167 ± 7 | 0.784 |
| Weight, kg | 58 ± 12 | 67 ± 15 | 0.006 |
| BSA, m2 | 1.65 ± 0.20 | 1.75 ± 0.19 | 0.026 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 20 ± 3 | 24 ± 5 | 0.001 |
| Heart rate, bpm | 64 ± 9 | 67 ± 10 | 0.136 |
| Office systolic BP, mm Hg | 112 ± 9 | 118 ± 9 | 0.002 |
| Office diastolic BP, mm Hg | 64 ± 7 | 69 ± 7 | 0.002 |
| 24-h systolic BP, mm Hg | 107 ± 7 | 123 ± 6 | <0.001 |
| 24-h diastolic BP, mm Hg | 62 ± 5 | 71 ± 4 | <0.001 |
| Daytime systolic BP, mm Hg | 112 ± 7 | 127 ± 8 | <0.001 |
| Daytime diastolic BP, mm Hg | 66 ± 6 | 75 ± 5 | <0.001 |
| Night-time systolic BP, mm Hg | 100 ± 7 | 114 ± 9 | <0.001 |
| Night-time diastolic BP, mm Hg | 56 ± 4 | 64 ± 5 | <0.001 |
| Fasting Plasma Glucose, mmol/L | 4.7 ± 0.3 | 5.0 ± 0.4 | 0.006 |
| Triglycerides, mmol/L | 0.7 ± 0.3 | 0.9 ± 0.5 | 0.049 |
| Total cholesterol, mmol/L | 4.0 ± 0.7 | 4.1 ± 0.7 | 0.878 |
| LDL cholesterol, mmol/L | 2.2 ± 0.6 | 2.4 ± 0.6 | 0.143 |
| HDL cholesterol, mmol/L | 1.5 ± 0.3 | 1.2 ± 0.5 | 0.005 |
Data are presented as mean ± SD or percentages.
BSA, body surface area; BMI, body mass index; BP, blood pressure; MH, masked hypertension.
Left ventricular geometry and cardiovascular function.
| LVEDD, mm | 46 ± 5 | 48 ± 4 | 0.022 |
| LVESD, mm | 31 ± 4 | 32 ± 3 | 0.272 |
| IVS, mm | 7.3 ± 1.3 | 7.6 ± 1.5 | 0.214 |
| PWT, mm | 7.2 ± 1.1 | 7.0 ± 1.3 | 0.853 |
| RWT | 0.32 ± 0.05 | 0.31 ± 0.05 | 0.506 |
| LVM, g | 104 ± 30 | 115 ± 33 | 0.111 |
| LVM/height2.7, g/m2.7 | 25.4 ± 5.8 | 28.6 ± 6.5 | 0.025 |
| LVEDV, mL | 101 ± 22 | 99 ± 17 | 0.618 |
| LVSV, mL | 62 ± 12 | 64 ± 11 | 0.399 |
| LVEF, % | 61 ± 5 | 63 ± 4 | 0.113 |
| E/A ratio | 2.5 ± 0.7 | 2.2 ± 0.6 | 0.054 |
| Mitral annulus e′, cm/s | 13.7 ± 1.7 | 12.3 ± 1.6 | <0.001 |
| E/e′ | 6.7 ± 1.4 | 7.2 ± 1.7 | 0.133 |
Cases and controls were matched for sex, age, race and body height.
MH, masked hypertension; LVEDD, left ventricular end-diastolic dimension; LVESD, left ventricular end-systolic dimension; IVS, interventricular septum; PWT, posterior wall thickness; RWT, relative wall thickness; LVM, left ventricular mass; LVEDV, left ventricular end-diastolic volume; LVSV, left ventricular stroke volume; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; E, early diastolic mitral flow (pulsed Doppler); A, late diastolic mitral flow (pulse Doppler); e′, peak early diastolic relaxation velocity of the septal mitral annulus (tissue Doppler).
Comparison of myocardial strain parameters for study groups.
| GLS, % | −18.9 ± 1.7 | −18.0 ± 1.8 | 0.026 |
| GCS, % | −20.9 ± 2.6 | −19.2 ± 2.2 | 0.002 |
| GRS, % | 49.0 ± 13.1 | 51.2 ± 13.4 | 0.468 |
| Apical rotation, degree | 13.6 ± 4.9 | 13.5 ± 5.8 | 0.935 |
| Systolic longitudinal strain rate, s−1 | −1.03 ± 0.1 | −0.97 ± 0.1 | 0.019 |
| Early longitudinal diastolic strain rate, s−1 | 1.84 ± 0.2 | 1.66 ± 0.3 | 0.001 |
| Late longitudinal diastolic strain rate, s−1 | 0.50 ± 0.1 | 0.54 ± 0.1 | 0.098 |
| Endocardium GLS, % | −21.6 ± 1.9 | −20.4 ± 1.9 | 0.007 |
| Mid-myocardium GLS, % | −18.8 ± 1.7 | −17.8 ± 1.7 | 0.017 |
| Epicardium GLS, % | −16.3 ± 1.5 | −15.8 ± 1.9 | 0.164 |
| Endocardium GCS, % | −30.4 ± 3.4 | −28.9 ± 3.0 | 0.037 |
| Mid-myocardium GCS, % | −19.8 ± 2.5 | −18.0 ± 2.2 | 0.001 |
| Epicardium GCS, % | −12.5 ± 2.1 | −10.6 ± 1.9 | <0.001 |
GLS, global longitudinal strain; GCS, global circumferential strain; GRS, Global radial strain.
Figure 2Comparison of layer-specific strains between young subjects with masked hypertension (MH) and normotensive controls (NC). Left ventricular global longitudinal (LS) (A) and circumferential strain (CS) (B) were significantly lower in youth with MH than in normotensive controls. Moreover, layer-specific strain analysis showed that endocardial and mid-myocardial LS (A) and CS (B) during systole were significantly worsened in the young MH individuals when compared to controls. LSendo, endocardial longitudinal strain; LSmid, mid-myocardial longitudinal strain; LSepi, epicardial longitudinal strain; GLS, global longitudinal strain; CSendo, endocardial circumferential strain; CSmid, mid-myocardial circumferential strain; CSepi, epicardial circumferential strain; GCS, global circumferential strain. *P < 0.05.
Intra- and inter-observer variability of layer-specific strain parameters.
| Endocardium | 0.972 | 0.917–0.991 | <0.001 | 0.888 | 0.665–0.962 | <0.001 |
| Mid-myocardium | 0.984 | 0.954–0.995 | <0.001 | 0.839 | 0.520–0.946 | 0.001 |
| Epicardium | 0.993 | 0.978–0.998 | <0.001 | 0.835 | 0.509–0.945 | 0.001 |
| Endocardium | 0.940 | 0.824–0.980 | <0.001 | 0.801 | 0.418–0.933 | 0.003 |
| Mid-myocardium | 0.951 | 0.818–0.985 | <0.001 | 0.845 | 0.542–0.948 | 0.001 |
| Epicardium | 0.950 | 0.757–0.986 | <0.001 | 0.896 | 0.691–0.965 | <0.001 |
ICCs, intraclass correlation coefficients; CI, confidence interval.