| Literature DB >> 29951389 |
Majid Davari1, Bahman Amani2, Fariborz Mokarian3, Mohsen Hoseini4, Arash Akbarzadeh5, Nastaran Heidarzadeh Khoramabadi6.
Abstract
Background: Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy has long been established as a standard treatment for HER2-positive patients in early stage breast cancer (BC). The present study aimed at assessing the effectiveness of trastuzumab adjuvant therapy in early stage BC in overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).Entities:
Keywords: Adjuvant Therapy; Breast Cancer; Herceptin; Meta-analysis; Trastuzumab
Year: 2017 PMID: 29951389 PMCID: PMC6014767 DOI: 10.14196/mjiri.31.88
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med J Islam Repub Iran ISSN: 1016-1430
Fig. 1Study characteristics
| No. | Study | N | Duration | Intervention | Comparison | Jadad scale |
| 1 | B31(10) | 394 | >6 months | Trastuzumab | Without Trastuzumab | 2 |
| 2 | BCIRG006(11) | 1703 | >6 months | Trastuzumab | Without Trastuzumab | 1 |
| 3 | Buzdar(12) | 42 | 6 months | Trastuzumab | Without Trastuzumab | 3 |
| 4 | Finher(13) | 1010 | <6 months | Trastuzumab | Without Trastuzumab | 3 |
| 5 | Hera(14) | 5081 | >6 months | Trastuzumab | Without Trastuzumab | 3 |
| 6 | Noah(15) | 235 | >6 months | Trastuzumab | Without Trastuzumab | 3 |
| 7 | Pacs-04(16) | 528 | >6 months | Trastuzumab | Without Trastuzumab | 1 |
| 8 | Goldhirsch(17) | 5102 | >6 months | Trastuzumab | Without Trastuzumab | 3 |
| 9 | Joensuu(18) | 1500 | <6 months and >6 months | Trastuzumab | Chemotherapy without Trastuzumab | 2 |
| 10 | Schneider(19) | 227 | <6 months and >6 months | Trastuzumab | 1 year or 12 weeks Trastuzumab | 3 |
| 11 | Gianni(20) | 5102 | >6 months | Trastuzumab | Without trasuzumab | 3 |
Fig. 2The results of the meta-analysis of OS outcome
| Study | Ln(HR) | SE(Ln(HR)) | Confidence interval | Weight |
| B31 | -0.4 | 0.17 | (-0.733,-0.067) | 8.16 |
| BCIRG006 | -0.46 | 0.13 | (-0.715,-0.205) | 13.95 |
| Finher | -0.6 | 0.36 | (-1.3,0.106) | 1.82 |
| Hera | -0.46 | 0.17 | (-0.793,-0.127) | 8.16 |
| Noah | -0.48 | 0.3 | (-1.07,0.108) | 2.62 |
| Pacs-04 | 0.24 | 0.32 | (-0.387,0.867) | 2.3 |
| Goldhirsch | -0.274 | 0.079 | (-0.429,-0.120) | 37.96 |
| Schneider | 0.336 | 0.325 | (-0.299,0.973) | 2.24 |
| Gianni | -0.162 | 0.102 | (-0.362,0.037) | 22.79 |
| Overall effect | -0.286 | 0.049 | (-0.381,-0.191) | |
| Directional Zero-Effect Test |
| |||
Fig. 3
Fig. 4The results of meta-analysis of DFS outcome
| Study |
|
| Confidence interval | Weight |
| B31 | -0.73 | 0.11 | (-0.946,-0.514) | 12.49 |
| Bcirg006 | -0.45 | 0.1 | (-0.646,-0.254) | 13.07 |
| Buzdar | -2.27 | 1.11 | (-4.44,-0.094) | 0.462 |
| Finher | -0.87 | 0.35 | (-1.56,-0.184) | 3.72 |
| Hera | -0.46 | 0.09 | (-0.636,-0.284) | 13.65 |
| Noah | -0.53 | 0.22 | (-0.961,-0.099) | 7.04 |
| Pacs-04 | -0.15 | 0.18 | (-0.503,0.203) | 8.72 |
| Goldhirsch | -0.274 | 0.07 | (-0.412,-0.137) | 14.75 |
| Joensuu | -0.892 | 0.271 | (-1.423,-0.514) | 5.51 |
| Schneider | 0.262 | 0.253 | (-0.234,0.758) | 5.93 |
| Gianni | -0.274 | 0.07 | (-0.412,-0.137) | 14.75 |
| Overall effect | -0.419 | 0.077 | (-0.569,-0.269) | |
| Directional Zero-Effect Test | χ 2 =116.915, df =1, P −value = 0.000 | |||
Fig. 5The summary of risk of BIAS results
| Study | Sequence generation | Allocation concealment | Blinding of participants | Incomplete outcome data | Selective outcome reporting |
| B31 | Low | Unclear | High | High | Unclear |
| BCIRG006 | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | High |
| Buzdar | Low | Low | High | Low | High |
| FinHer | Low | Low | High | Low | High |
| HERA | Low | Unclear | High | Low | Unclear |
| NOAH | Low | Unclear | High | Low | Low |
| PACS-04 | Unclear | Unclear | High | Low | Unclear |
| Gianni | Low | Unclear | High | Low | Low |
| Goldhirsch | Low | Unclear | High | Low | Low |
| Joensuu | Low | Unclear | High | Low | Low |
| Schneider | Low | Unclear | High | Low | Low |