Literature DB >> 29951220

Men who were thin during early adulthood exhibited greater weight gain-associated visceral fat accumulation in a study of middle-aged Japanese men.

M Koda1,2, I Kitamura2,3, T Okura2,4, R Otsuka2, F Ando2,5, H Shimokata2,6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the relationship between weight gain from early adulthood and visceral fat accumulation.
METHODS: The participants were 549 men aged 42 to 64 years who were randomly selected from the local resident registry for the National Institute for Longevity Sciences' neighbourhood. They were asked to recall their weight at 18 years of age, and then, post-18 weight-change values were calculated for each participant (their current weight minus their weight at 18). The participants were divided according to their median body mass index (BMI) at 18 years of age (initial BMI) (<20.14 and ≥20.14 kg m-2). Visceral fat area (VFA) and subcutaneous fat area (SFA) were measured on computed tomography scans.
RESULTS: The participants with initial BMI of <20.14 kg m-2 exhibited greater post-18 weight changes than those with initial BMI of ≥20.14 kg m-2. The participants' post-18 weight-change values were negatively correlated with their initial BMI and positively correlated with both VFA and SFA. The slope of the regression line for the relationship between post-18 weight change and VFA was steeper in the participants with initial BMI of <20.14 kg m-2 (β = 4.36) than in those with initial BMI of ≥20.14 kg m-2 (β = 3.23).
CONCLUSIONS: Visceral fat accumulation is affected not only by an individual's post-18 weight gain but also by their initial BMI. Men who were thin in early adulthood experienced greater weight gain-associated VFA increases, but the same was not true for SFA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Visceral fat; weight at 18 years of age; weight gain

Year:  2018        PMID: 29951220      PMCID: PMC6009997          DOI: 10.1002/osp4.270

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obes Sci Pract        ISSN: 2055-2238


Introduction

Weight gain is commonly observed between early adulthood and middle age 1, 2, 3, 4. According to the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey in 2014 (a cross‐sectional survey) 1, the mean body mass index (BMI) for Japanese men was 22.4 kg m−2 in the 20 to 29 years age group, 24.0 kg m−2 in the 40 to 49 years age group and 23.9 kg m−2 in the 50 to 59 years age group. According to the National Health Examination and the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys conducted in the USA from 1999 to 2002, the mean BMIs for men aged 20 to 29 years, 40 to 49 years and 50 to 59 years were 26.6, 28.4 and 28.7 kg m−2, respectively 2. In Norway, men aged 20–29 years exhibited a mean weight increase of 7.9 kg over 11 years 3. In a 14‐year follow‐up study conducted in South Wales, the mean BMI was 22.3 kg m−2 at 18 years, and the mean weight gain during the study period was 11.2 kg (standard deviation [SD]: 11.2) 4. There are several causes of weight changes, such as variations in food intake or physical activity 5, smoking habits 6, 7, 8, and genetic factors 9. In a study of middle‐aged and elderly Japanese men, a combination of cholecystokinin 1 receptor and beta‐3 adrenergic receptor polymorphisms was found to be associated with a weight gain of ≥10 kg after age 18 9. Marked weight gain is as harmful to health as being overweight or obese. In previous studies, weight gain from early adulthood to middle age was demonstrated to be closely associated with cardiovascular disease 10, 11, coronary heart disease 4, 12, 13, and diabetes in men 5. Chei et al. found that weight gain was associated with a two‐fold greater risk of coronary heart disease in Japanese men 11. Furthermore, the latter relationship was observed in men who had BMI of <21.7 kg m−2 at 20 years of age but not in those with BMI ≥21.7 kg m−2 at this age. They assumed that weight gain in initially lean men tends to favour upper abdominal fat accumulation over lower abdominal fat accumulation. Moreover, this tendency was weaker in men with higher BMI at 20 years of age. However, the latter study did not examine fat distribution, including visceral fat (VF) volume or area. Koh‐Banerjee et al. found that weight gain was associated with the risk of diabetes 5, but they only measured waist circumference; i.e., they did not assess VF accumulation. However, waist circumference is not necessarily an accurate measure of VF accumulation, as it is influenced by both VF and subcutaneous fat (SF). A previous study reported that VF accumulation was more strongly associated with numerous diseases than SF accumulation 14, 15. Thus, the weight gain seen from early adulthood to middle age might be strongly associated with VF accumulation, especially in lean young adults. However, little is known about the association between such weight changes and VF accumulation. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the association between the weight change from 18 years of age to the present day (post‐18 weight gain) and VF area (VFA).

Methods

Participants

The participants were selected from among the 944 Japanese men (age range, 41 to 81 years) who participated in the first and second waves of the National Institute for Longevity Sciences‐Longitudinal Study of Aging (NILS‐LSA) 16. The NILS‐LSA involved gender‐stratified and age‐stratified samples from the neighbourhood of the NILS, who were randomly selected from the local resident registry in cooperation with the local government. The study participants were 549 men (age range, 42 to 64 years) for whom no measurements were missing (Figure 1). The participants who had quit smoking more than 1 year ago after smoking for more than 1 year were also excluded because smoking habits also affect weight changes. Many studies have indicated that smokers tend to have lower body weights than non‐smokers 7, and smoking cessation is known to be associated with substantial weight gain 6, 8. Weight gain was associated with increases in total cholesterol, triglyceride and β‐lipoprotein levels in men and women who ranged in age from 18 to 64 years but not in those who ranged in age from 65 to 88 years of age 17. Thus, men ranging in age from 65 to 82 years were excluded from this study.
Figure 1

Sampling procedure.

Sampling procedure.

Measurements

The measurements were obtained in 1 d in the second wave of the NILS‐LSA (April 2000 to May 2002). Body weight (kg) was measured in the morning after overnight fasting using digital scales while the participants were only wearing underwear. Waist circumference was measured at the level of the umbilicus with a fibreglass tape measure. VFA (cm2) and SF area (SFA; cm2) were measured on computed tomography scans of the abdomen taken at the umbilical level (L4 to L5). All of the computed tomography scans (SCT‐6800TX; Shimadzu, Japan) were performed with the participants in the supine position. VFA and SFA were calculated using computer software (Fat Scan; N2 Systems, Japan) 18 in accordance with a previously described procedure 19. Percentage body fat was measured using dual energy X‐ray absorptiometry (Hologic QDR‐4500). The participants' weights at 18 years of age were self‐reported via the first‐wave questionnaires (November 1997 to May 2000).

Data analysis

Body mass index at 18 years (the initial BMI) was calculated as the participant's weight (kg) at 18 years divided by their current height (m) squared. Post‐18 weight‐change values were calculated for each participant (the participant's current weight minus their weight at 18 years of age). Spearman's rank correlation coefficients were calculated for the relationships between post‐18 weight gain and VFA or SFA. The participants were grouped into two categories based on the median initial BMI (<20.14 and ≥20.14 kg m−2). The unpaired Student's t‐test was used to compare the post‐18 weight changes seen in the two groups. In each group, two‐way analysis of covariance (ancova) was used to evaluate the effects of the interactions between (i) the initial BMI and post‐18 weight gain and (ii) the initial BMI and current BMI on the participants' VFA and SFA after controlling for age. Regression lines were produced using multiple linear regression analysis, and the associated regression coefficients were compared. Comparisons between frequencies were performed using the chi‐squared test. The data were analysed using the SAS statistical software package (release 9.3; SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). Probability values of <0.05 were regarded as significant.

Ethics

This study was performed in accordance with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki – Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. The purpose of this study and the procedures for each examination were fully explained to the participants. All of the participants provided written informed consent. All data were analysed collectively, and the participants' privacy was protected. All of the procedures conducted in the NILS‐LSA were approved by the committee of ethics for human research at the National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology.

Results

The participants' characteristics are shown in Table 1. Their mean initial BMI was 20.4 (SD: 2.3) skg m−2, and their mean current BMI was 23.3 (SD: 2.8) kg m−2. The mean post‐18 weight change was 8.0 (SD: 7.9) kg. The participants with initial BMI of <20.14 kg m−2 exhibited a greater mean post‐18 weight change than the participants with initial BMI of ≥20.14 kg m−2 (p < 0.001). The participants with initial BMI of <20.14 kg m−2 exhibited lower mean current BMI, VFA, SFA, and waist circumference values than the men with initial BMI of ≥20.14 kg m−2, but this was not true for percentage body fat. Table 2 shows data regarding post‐18 weight changes. Post‐18 weight increases of >10 kg were seen in 39% of men, and such increases were significantly more common among the men with initial BMI of <20.14 kg m−2 (49.3%) than among those with initial BMI of ≥20.14 kg m−2 (28.7%) (p < 0.001).
Table 1

Participants' characteristics according to their BMI at 18 years of age

BMI at 18 years of age
All<20.14 kg m−2 ≥20.14 kg m−2
n = 549 n = 274 n = 275 p‐value
Age (years)53.7 (6.5)53.4 (6.6)54.0 (6.3)0.331
BMI (kg m−2)23.3 (2.8)22.4 (2.6)24.2 (2.6)<0.001
BMI at 18 years (kg m−2)20.4 (2.3)18.7 (1.0)22.1 (1.8)<0.001
Post‐18 weight change (kg)8.1 (7.9)10.3 (7.6)5.8 (7.6)<0.001
Visceral fat area (cm2)92.0 (45.3)86.8 (45.4)96.9 (44.6)0.009
Subcutaneous fat area (cm2)114.6 (49.7)106.4 (46.2)122.4 (51.7)0.001
Percentage body fat (%)20.8 (4.3)20.5 (4.3)21.1 (4.2)0.080
Waist circumference (cm)85.2 (7.8)83.8 (7.6)86.6 (7.7)<0.001

Data are shown as mean (standard deviation) values.

BMI, body mass index.

Table 2

Frequency of weight change from 18 years of age to the present

BMI at 18 years of age
Post‐18 weight change (kg)All<20.14 kg m−2 ≥20.14 kg m−2
n % n % n % p‐value*
<0.08014.6207.36021.8<0.001
0–9.925546.411943.413649.5
≥10.021439.013549.37928.7

According to the chi‐squared test.

BMI, body mass index.

Participants' characteristics according to their BMI at 18 years of age Data are shown as mean (standard deviation) values. BMI, body mass index. Frequency of weight change from 18 years of age to the present According to the chi‐squared test. BMI, body mass index. The post‐18 weight change was positively correlated with VFA, SFA, and waist circumference (after controlling for age and initial BMI), and it was negatively correlated with the initial BMI (after controlling for age) (Table 3). Two‐way ancova demonstrated that the interaction between the initial BMI (<20.14 and ≥20.14 kg m−2) and post‐18 weight change was significantly associated with VFA (p = 0.026), but not SFA (p = 0.554), after controlling for age (Table 4). The regression coefficient for the relationship between post‐18 weight change and VFA was significantly larger among the participants with initial BMI of <20.14 kg m−2 (β = 4.29, standard error [SE] = 0.24) than among those with initial BMI of ≥20.14 kg m−2 (β = 3.60, SE = 0.31) (Figure 2). In the same way, two‐way ancova demonstrated that the interaction between initial BMI (<20.14 and ≥20.14 kg m−2) and current BMI was not significantly associated with VFA (p = 0.584) or SFA (p = 0.436), after controlling for age (Table 4). However, the men with initial BMI of <20.14 kg m−2 demonstrated significantly larger (98.3 and 120.0 cm2, respectively) least means square values for VFA and SFA than the men with initial BMI of ≥20.14 kg m−2 (85.9 and 108.2 cm2, respectively).
Table 3

Spearman's correlation coefficients for the relationships among the post‐18 weight change, BMI at 18 years old, visceral fat area, subcutaneous fat area and waist circumference after controlling for age and BMI at 18 years of age

Post‐18 weight change (kg)
BMI at 18 years of age −0.344 p < 0.001
Visceral fat area (cm2) 0.691 p < 0.001
Subcutaneous fat area (cm2) 0.781 p < 0.001
Waist circumference (cm) 0.851 p < 0.001

After controlling for age.

After controlling for age and BMI at 18 years of age.

BMI, body mass index.

Table 4

Two‐way factorial anova results

F‐value p‐value
Visceral fat areaBMI at 18 years61.67<0.001
Post‐18 weight change418.73<0.001
Age28.99<0.001
BMI at 18 years * post‐18 weight change5.010.026
Subcutaneous fat areaBMI at 18 years80.86<0.001
Post‐18 weight change598.39<0.001
Age0.150.697
BMI at 18 years * post‐18 weight change0.350.554
Visceral fat areaBMI at 18 years0.000.967
BMI526.89<0.001
Age19.12<0.001
BMI at 18 years * BMI0.300.584
Subcutaneous fat areaBMI at 18 years1.740.188
BMI1,103.38<0.001
Age5.680.018
BMI at 18 years * BMI0.610.435

ANOVA, analysis of variance; BMI, body mass index.

Figure 2

Estimated changes in visceral fat area and subcutaneous fat area according to each 1‐kg weight change as determined by regression analysis. BMI, body mass index.

Spearman's correlation coefficients for the relationships among the post‐18 weight change, BMI at 18 years old, visceral fat area, subcutaneous fat area and waist circumference after controlling for age and BMI at 18 years of age After controlling for age. After controlling for age and BMI at 18 years of age. BMI, body mass index. Two‐way factorial anova results ANOVA, analysis of variance; BMI, body mass index. Estimated changes in visceral fat area and subcutaneous fat area according to each 1‐kg weight change as determined by regression analysis. BMI, body mass index.

Discussion

This study showed that the weight change that occurred in men during the period from 18 years of age to middle age (post‐18 weight change) was positively correlated with the increases in both VFA and SFA during the same period. However, VFA differed depending on the participants' weight at 18 years of age. The slope of the regression line for the relationship between post‐18 weight change (x) and VFA (y) was steeper in men with initial BMI of <20.14 kg m−2 (β = 4.29, SE: 0.24) than in those with initial BMI of ≥20.14 kg m−2 (β = 3.60, SE: 0.31). In other words, the VFA increase that accompanied the weight gain that occurred between the age of 18 and middle age was greater in men who were thin during early adulthood. Chei et al. found that weight gain of ≥10 kg was associated with a two‐fold greater risk of coronary heart disease in men with BMI of <21.7 kg m−2 at 20 years of age but not in men with BMI of ≥21.7 kg m−2 at 20 years of age 11. This result can be explained by the findings of the present study. Individuals with BMI of <21.7 kg m−2 at 20 years of age might possess more VF than those with BMI of ≥21.7 kg m−2. Furthermore, the post‐18 weight change was found to be negatively correlated with the initial BMI (r = −0.338) after controlling for age. This suggests that thin men are more likely to gain weight and accumulate VF during early adulthood than other men. From the viewpoint of molecular biology, the total number of adipocytes increases in childhood and adolescence and then levels off and remains constant in adulthood 20. Subcutaneous adipose tissue storage acts as a buffer for excessive energy intake 21. In men who are thin when they are young, the number of fat cells might be relatively low. Therefore, fat cannot accumulate in SF cells alone and so might also accumulate in the abdominal cavity. In order to prevent VF accumulation, it is important that men are not too thin during early adulthood and that their weight does not increase markedly between age 18 and middle age. Smoking habits also affect weight changes. In the present study, 39.0% of the participants were smokers, which was similar to the prevalence figure obtained in a national survey in 2016 (40 to 49 years of age: 41.1%; 50 to 59: 39.0%; 60 to 69: 28.9%) 1. Smoking might help to prevent weight gain or aid the maintenance of a low body weight 6, 7, 8. As a consequence, VFA might not increase in smokers. However, even if they exhibit little VF, smokers have higher blood haemoglobin A1c levels than those who do not smoke 22. Therefore, smoking in order to prevent weight gain is not advisable. In this study, the association between VFA and current BMI was significantly stronger among the men with initial BMI of <20.14 kg m−2 than among the men with initial BMI of ≥21.14 kg m−2. In recent years, BMI and waist circumference have been used to diagnose obesity and abdominal adipose tissue accumulation. Post‐18 weight change might be another useful parameter for diagnosing obesity and abdominal adipose tissue accumulation. This highlights the fact that BMI does not provide any information about body composition or body fat distribution. This study had some limitations. First, the participants' weights at 18 years of age were not measured; rather, they were self‐reported using a questionnaire. However, Tamakoshi et al. reported that individuals were able to recall their past weights with good accuracy over long periods 23. Casey et al. also detected strong correlations between measured weight at 18 years of age and self‐reported recalled weight at 50 years of age 24. Second, the timing of the participants' post‐18 weight changes was not examined. Previous studies have reported that weight fluctuations were associated with an increased risk of all‐cause mortality. Zhang et al. found that among Japanese men aged 40–49 years, the development of metabolic syndrome might explain the increased risk of cardiovascular disease, not only in people with overweight or obesity but also in normal‐weight people that exhibit large weight fluctuations 25. In conclusion, in middle‐aged men, the weight change that occurs between 18 years of age and middle age was found to be positively correlated with the increases in VFA and SFA observed during the same period. SFA might increase with weight in a uniform manner. However, VF accumulation was affected not only by an individual's post‐18 weight gain but also by their initial BMI. Men who were thin in early adulthood experienced greater weight gain‐associated VFA increases, but the same was not true for SFA. Moreover, although the men with initial BMI of <20.14 kg m−2 exhibited lower current BMI, VFA, SFA and waist circumference values than the men with initial BMI of ≥21.14 kg m−2, the association between VFA and current BMI was stronger among the men with initial BMI of <20.14 kg m−2.

Conflicts of Interest Statement

None declared.
  24 in total

1.  Changes of body weight in normal men who stop smoking cigarettes.

Authors:  J BROZEK; A KEYS
Journal:  Science       Date:  1957-06-14       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Mean body weight, height, and body mass index, United States 1960-2002.

Authors:  Cynthia L Ogden; Cheryl D Fryar; Margaret D Carroll; Katherine M Flegal
Journal:  Adv Data       Date:  2004-10-27

3.  Long-term memory of body weight and past weight satisfaction: a longitudinal follow-up study.

Authors:  V A Casey; J T Dwyer; C S Berkey; K A Coleman; J Gardner; I Valadian
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 7.045

4.  Change in height, weight and body mass index: Longitudinal data from the HUNT Study in Norway.

Authors:  W B Drøyvold; T I L Nilsen; O Krüger; T L Holmen; S Krokstad; K Midthjell; J Holmen
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.095

5.  Relationships of resting energy expenditure with body fat distribution and abdominal fatness in Japanese population.

Authors:  Tomohiro Okura; Michiko Koda; Fujiko Ando; Naoakira Niino; Hiroshi Shimokata
Journal:  J Physiol Anthropol Appl Human Sci       Date:  2003-01

Review 6.  Subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue: their relation to the metabolic syndrome.

Authors:  B L Wajchenberg
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 19.871

7.  Obesity, regional body fat distribution, and the metabolic syndrome in older men and women.

Authors:  Bret H Goodpaster; Shanthi Krishnaswami; Tamara B Harris; Andreas Katsiaras; Steven B Kritchevsky; Eleanor M Simonsick; Michael Nevitt; Paul Holvoet; Anne B Newman
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2005-04-11

8.  Comparison of weight in middle age, weight at 18 years, and weight change between, in predicting subsequent 14 year mortality and coronary events: Caerphilly Prospective Study.

Authors:  J W Yarnell; C C Patterson; H F Thomas; P M Sweetnam
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.710

9.  The case of visceral fat: argument for the defense.

Authors:  Samuel Klein
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 14.808

10.  Smoking cessation and severity of weight gain in a national cohort.

Authors:  D F Williamson; J Madans; R F Anda; J C Kleinman; G A Giovino; T Byers
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-03-14       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  1 in total

1.  Weight Gain After 20 Years of Age is Associated with Unfavorable Lifestyle and Increased Prevalence of Metabolic Disorders.

Authors:  Noriko Takebe; Kozo Tanno; Hideki Ohmomo; Mari Hangai; Tomoyasu Oda; Yutaka Hasegawa; Nobuyuki Takanashi; Ryohei Sasaki; Atsushi Shimizu; Akira Sasaki; Kiyomi Sakata; Makoto Sasaki; Yasushi Ishigaki
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 3.168

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.