| Literature DB >> 29951210 |
Phillipo Paul1, Richard Y M Kangalawe1, Leonard E G Mboera2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Understanding of the land use and malaria transmission among farming communities in Tanzania is of great significance. Water resource development projects, deforestation, wetland cultivation, and land use changes for agricultural purposes all expand habitats for malaria-carrying mosquitoes. The main objective of this study was to assess land use patterns and their implication on malaria transmission in two villages in Kilosa District, Tanzania.Entities:
Keywords: Agriculture; Land use patterns; Malaria transmission; Tanzania
Year: 2018 PMID: 29951210 PMCID: PMC6011254 DOI: 10.1186/s40794-018-0066-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Trop Dis Travel Med Vaccines ISSN: 2055-0936
Fig. 1Map of Kimamba villages
Age of respondents expressed in percent
| Age group (years) | Kimamba A | Kimamba B | Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | Male | Female | Male | Female | |
| 18–35 | 21.3 | 38.4 | 18.5 | 22.5 | 19.9 | 30.5 |
| 36–55 | 11.2 | 12.9 | 12.1 | 25.2 | 11.7 | 19.1 |
| 56+ | 6.4 | 9.8 | 10.7 | 11 | 8.6 | 10.4 |
| Total | 38.9 | 61.1 | 41.3 | 58.7 | 40.1 | 59.9 |
Education level of respondents expressed in percent
| Level of education | Kimamba A | Kimamba B | Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Men | Women | Men | Women | Male | Female | |
| None | 9.5 | 27.3 | 5.5 | 22.3 | 7.5 | 24.8 |
| Primary | 15.9 | 41.8 | 17.2 | 50.0 | 16.6 | 45.9 |
| Secondary | 1.0 | 4.5 | 1.5 | 2.5 | 1.3 | 3.5 |
| Post-secondary education | 0 | 0 | 1.0 | 0 | 0.5 | 0 |
| Total | 26.4 | 73.6 | 25.2 | 74.8 | 25.8 | 74.2 |
Major economic activities of the respondents expressed in percent
| Occupation | Kimamba A | Kimamba B | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crop cultivation | 94.3 | 87.8 | 91.1 |
| Petty trade/Business | 2.4 | 5.3 | 3.9 |
| Employees | 0 | 2.7 | 1.4 |
| Pastoralism | 0.5 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Mixed farming | 0 | 0.5 | 0.3 |
| Others | 2.8 | 3.7 | 3.3 |
| Total | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Fig. 2Main land uses in Kimamba Villages
Fig. 3Bricks making sites (a) in a public place and (b) near the homestead
Fig. 4Water container (left) and an open well (right)
Fig. 5Tyre marks (left) and water tank around homesteads (right)
Diversity of mosquito breeding grounds in Kimamba villages
| Habitat type | Kimamba “A” | Kimamba “B” | Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Posta | Uhindini | Mkwajuni | Sikutali | Sokomsuya | Number | % | |
| Water pools | 10 | 5 | 21 | 25 | 3 | 64 | 30 |
| Wells | 1 | 2 | 5 | 14 | 2 | 24 | 11 |
| Broken pots | 7 | 0 | 8 | 7 | 0 | 22 | 10.4 |
| Hoof prints | 0 | 14 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 22 | 10.4 |
| Tins | 5 | 2 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 19 | 10 |
| Coconut shells | 0 | 0 | 6 | 11 | 1 | 18 | 8.1 |
| Ditches | 6 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 13 | 6 |
| Broken buckets | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 9 | 3.3 |
| Tyre marks | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 1.9 |
| Concrete holes | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 1.9 |
| Broken Drums | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 2 |
| Old Tyres | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
| Banana leaves | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
| Swamps | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Streams | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Water holes | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
|
| 37 | 32 | 53 | 83 | 6 | 211 | 100 |
Percent response on the status of mosquito breeding sites in Kimamba village
| Villages | Sub-village | Water status | Origin | Associated livelihoods | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Water | Dry | Man-made | Natural | Farming | Constructions | ||
| Kimamba “A” | Posta | 9.0 | 10.4 | 18.5 | 0.9 | 4.7 | 14.7 |
| Uhindini | 7.1 | 8.1 | 12.3 | 2.8 | 1.9 | 13.3 | |
| Kimamba “B” | Mkwajuni | 17.1 | 7.1 | 24.2 | 0 | 0.5 | 23.7 |
| Sikutali | 26.5 | 12.8 | 38.4 | 0.9 | 14.7 | 24.6 | |
| Sokomsuya | 1.4 | 0.5 | 1.9 | 0 | 0.5 | 1.4 | |
| Total | 61.1 | 38.9 | 95.3 | 4.7 | 22.3 | 77.7 | |