| Literature DB >> 29951039 |
Sonia M Rodríguez-Ruano1, Veronika Škochová1, Ryan O M Rego2, Justin O Schmidt3, Walter Roachell4, Václav Hypša1,2, Eva Nováková1,2.
Abstract
Insect microbiomes influence many fundamental host traits, including functions of practical significance such as their capacity as vectors to transmit parasites and pathogens. The knowledge on the diversity and development of the gut microbiomes in various blood feeding insects is thus crucial not only for theoretical purposes, but also for the development of better disease control strategies. In Triatominae (Heteroptera: Reduviidae), the blood feeding vectors of Chagas disease in South America and parts of North America, the investigation of the microbiomes is in its infancy. The few studies done on microbiomes of South American Triatominae species indicate a relatively low taxonomic diversity and a high host specificity. We designed a comparative survey to serve several purposes: (I) to obtain a better insight into the overall microbiome diversity in different species, (II) to check the long term stability of the interspecific differences, (III) to describe the ontogenetic changes of the microbiome, and (IV) to determine the potential correlation between microbiome composition and presence of Trypanosoma cruzi, the causative agent of Chagas disease. Using 16S amplicons of two abundant species from the southern US, and four laboratory reared colonies, we showed that the microbiome composition is determined by host species, rather than locality or environment. The OTUs (Operational Taxonomic Units) determination confirms a low microbiome diversity, with 12-17 main OTUs detected in wild populations of T. sanguisuga and T. protracta. Among the dominant bacterial taxa are Acinetobacter and Proteiniphilum but also the symbiotic bacterium Arsenophonus triatominarum, previously believed to only live intracellularly. The possibility of ontogenetic microbiome changes was evaluated in all six developmental stages and feces of the laboratory reared model Rhodnius prolixus. We detected considerable changes along the host's ontogeny, including clear trends in the abundance variation of the three dominant bacteria, namely Enterococcus, Acinetobacter, and Arsenophonus. Finally, we screened the samples for the presence of Trypanosoma cruzi. Comparing the parasite presence with the microbiome composition, we assessed the possible significance of the latter in the epidemiology of the disease. Particularly, we found a trend toward more diverse microbiomes in Trypanosoma cruzi positive T. protracta specimens.Entities:
Keywords: Rhodnius prolixus; Triatominae; Trypanosoma cruzi; microbiome; ontogeny
Year: 2018 PMID: 29951039 PMCID: PMC6008411 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01167
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
List of all the DNA isolates for which the 16S rRNA gene amplicon data were generated in this study.
| L1 | 3 | Whole abdomen | Laboratory colony, CZ | |
| L2 | 3 | Gut | Laboratory colony, CZ | |
| L3 | 3 | Gut | Laboratory colony, CZ | |
| L4 | 3 | Gut | Laboratory colony, CZ | |
| L5 | 3 | Gut | Laboratory colony, CZ | |
| adult, M | 1 | Gut | Laboratory colony, CZ | |
| adult, F | 2 | Gut | Laboratory colony, CZ | |
| NA | 3 | Egg | Laboratory colony, CZ | |
| NA | 5 | feces | Laboratory colony, CZ | |
| L1 | 3 | Whole abdomen | Laboratory colony, CZ | |
| L2 | 3 | Gut | Laboratory colony, CZ | |
| L1 | 5 | Whole abdomen | Laboratory colony, USA | |
| L1 | 5 | Whole abdomen | Laboratory colony, USA | |
| L4 | 4 | Gut | San Antonio, TX, 2016 | |
| L5 | 3 | Gut | San Antonio, TX, 2016 | |
| adult, F | 2 | Gut | San Antonio, TX, 2016 | |
| adult, M | 1 | Gut | San Antonio, TX, 2016 | |
| L4 | 4 | Other tissues and organs | San Antonio, TX, 2016 | |
| L5 | 3 | Other tissues and organs | San Antonio, TX, 2016 | |
| adult, F | 2 | Other tissues and organs | San Antonio, TX, 2016 | |
| adult, M | 1 | Other tissues and organs | San Antonio, TX, 2016 | |
| adult, M | 7 | Whole abdomen | Escondido, CA, 2007 | |
| adult, F | 7 | Whole abdomen | Escondido, CA, 2007 | |
| adult, M | 2 | Whole abdomen | Tucson, AZ, 2016 | |
| adult, F | 1 | Whole abdomen | Tucson, AZ, 2016 | |
| adult, M | 1 | Other tissues and organs | San Antonio, TX, 2016 | |
| adult, M | 1 | Gut | San Antonio, TX, 2016 | |
| adult, F | 1 | Other tissues and organs | San Antonio, TX, 2016 | |
| adult, F | 1 | Gut | San Antonio, TX, 2016 |
F and M stands for female and male. The bioinformatic abdomens were generated merging the Gut data and the data from Other tissues and organs for every respective individual.
Figure 1NMDS visualization of the ontogenetic shift of R. prolixus microbiome. F stands for feces, L0 for eggs, L1–L5 for nymphal instars. (A) Microbiome shift along the different developmental stages of R. prolixus. (B) NMDS including microbiome richness and 95% confident ellipses for each developmental stage. The ellipses were calculated with the stat_ellipse function of ggplot2 package.
Figure 2Microbiome of R. prolixus along its ontogeny. (A) Relative abundance of the main genera in different developmental stages. L0 stands for eggs, L1-L5 are nymphal instars. (B) Variation of the dominant OTUs; percentage of the total reads number (left axis) and number of OTUs in individual stages (right axis).
Figure 3NMDS visualization of significant differences between the microbiomes of T. protracta and T. sanguisuga sampled from wild populations. The abbreviations stand for the states where the bugs were sampled. The black border circles designate samples for which the bioinformatic abdomen was generated (see Material and Methods section). The ellipses are 95% confident ellipses calculated with the stat_ellipse function of ggplot2 package.
Figure 4Significant differences in microbiome richness of Trypanosoma cruzi infected and uninfected T. protracta adult individuals measured by Kruskal-Wallis rank test (chi-squared = 7.4558, df = 1, p-value = 0.006323). The numbers stand for the richness values. The black bars represent Trypanosoma cruzi negative samples. The white bars are Trypanosoma cruzi positive samples.
Figure 5Significant differences among microbiomes of the lab-reared colonies depicted by the NMDS clustering (significance level of 0.001, R2 = 0.784). The circles stand for L1 instar, stars for L2.