Literature DB >> 29950185

Centers for medicare and medicaid services hospital-acquired conditions policy for central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) and catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) shows minimal impact on hospital reimbursement.

Michael S Calderwood1, Alison Tse Kawai2, Robert Jin2, Grace M Lee2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In 2008, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) stopped reimbursing for hospital-acquired conditions (HACs) not present on admission (POA). We sought to understand why this policy did not impact central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) and catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) trends.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: Acute-care hospitals in the United States.ParticipantsFee-for-service Medicare patients discharged January 1, 2007, through December 31, 2011.
METHODS: Using inpatient Medicare claims data, we analyzed billing practices before and after the HAC policy was implemented, including the use and POA designation of codes for CLABSI or CAUTI. For the 3-year period following policy implementation, we determined the impact on diagnosis-related groups (DRG) determining reimbursement as well as hospital characteristics associated with the reimbursement impact.
RESULTS: During the study period, 65,205,607 Medicare fee-for-service hospitalizations occurred at 3,291 acute-care, nonfederal US hospitals. Based on coding, CLABSI and CAUTI affected 0.23% and 0.06% of these hospitalizations, respectively. In addition, following the HAC policy, 82% of the CLABSI codes and 91% of the CAUTI codes were marked POA, which represented a large increase in the use of this designation. Finally, for the small numbers of CLABSI and CAUTI coded as not POA, financial impacts were detected on only 0.4% of the hospitalizations with a CLABSI code and 5.7% with a CAUTI code.
CONCLUSIONS: Part of the reason the HAC policy did not have its intended impact is that billing codes for CLABSI and CAUTI were rarely used, were commonly listed as POA in the postpolicy period, and infrequently impacted hospital reimbursement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29950185     DOI: 10.1017/ice.2018.137

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol        ISSN: 0899-823X            Impact factor:   3.254


  4 in total

1.  Is it financially beneficial for hospitals to prevent nosocomial infections?

Authors:  Shmuel Benenson; Matan J Cohen; Carmela Schwartz; Michael Revva; Allon E Moses; Phillip D Levin
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 2.655

2.  Impact of the 2012 Medicaid Health Care-Acquired Conditions Policy on Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection and Vascular Catheter-Associated Infection Billing Rates.

Authors:  Chanu Rhee; Rui Wang; Maximilian S Jentzsch; Heather Hsu; Alison Tse Kawai; Robert Jin; Kelly Horan; Carly Broadwell; Grace M Lee
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 3.835

3.  Electronically Available Patient Claims Data Improve Models for Comparing Antibiotic Use Across Hospitals: Results From 576 US Facilities.

Authors:  Katherine E Goodman; Lisa Pineles; Laurence S Magder; Deverick J Anderson; Elizabeth Dodds Ashley; Ronald E Polk; Hude Quan; William E Trick; Keith F Woeltje; Surbhi Leekha; Sara E Cosgrove; Anthony D Harris
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 9.079

4.  The proportion, species distribution and dynamic trends of bloodstream infection cases in a tertiary hospital in China, 2010-2019.

Authors:  Jiewei Cui; Meng Li; Jiemin Cui; Juan Wang; Xiaofei Qiang; Zhixin Liang
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 3.553

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.