| Literature DB >> 29949943 |
Denis Mihaela Panaitescu1, Sorin Vizireanu2, Cristian Andi Nicolae3, Adriana Nicoleta Frone4, Angela Casarica5, Lavinia Gabriela Carpen6, Gheorghe Dinescu7.
Abstract
Tailoring the surface properties ofEntities:
Keywords: dielectric barrier discharge; nanocellulose; plasma treatment; polymer nanocomposite; submerged liquid plasma
Year: 2018 PMID: 29949943 PMCID: PMC6070974 DOI: 10.3390/nano8070467
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1Schematic representation of defibrillation and plasma treatment of nanocellulose.
Figure 2Configuration of plasma jet sources: dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) (a) and plasma torch (E) (b).
Conditions for dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) and plasma torch (E) plasma treatments of nanocellulose (NC).
| Samples | Ar flow (sccm) | Reactive Gas/Liquid | RF Power (W) | Treatment Time (min) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NC Ar | 3000 | - | 100 | 30 |
| NC Ar/O2 | 3000 | O2 (5 sccm) | 100 | 30 |
| NC Ar/N2 | 3000 | N2 (10 sccm) | 100 | 30 |
| NC Ar/N2 (E15) | 2000 | N2 (1500 sccm) | 250 | 15 |
| NC Ar/N2 (E30) | 2000 | N2 (1500 sccm) | 250 | 30 |
| NC Ar/NH3 | 3000 | NH3 (5 sccm) | 100 | 30 |
| NC Ar-ACN | 3000 | ACN 30% in water | 100 | 30 |
Figure 3Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image of nanocellulose (NC) from defibrillated membranes showing a sparse network of nanofibers.
Figure 4Atomic force microscopy (AFM) images (peakforce error) of untreated (a) and plasma treated NC: Ar (b); Ar/O2 (c); Ar/N2 (d); Ar/N2 (E30) (e); Ar/NH3 (f); Ar-ACN (g); Regions of interest showing small-length nanofibers agglomerations are framed in squares.
Figure 5AFM topographic images of untreated (a) and plasma treated NC: Ar (b); Ar/O2 (c); Ar/N2 (d); Ar/N2 (E30) (e); Ar/NH3 (f); Ar-ACN (g).
Figure 6Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) spectra (a) and derivative thermogravimetric (DTG) overlapped curves (b) of plasma treated NC.
Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) results for plasma treated NC.
| Samples | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NC | 244.0 | 284.1 | 332.1 | - | - | 10.6 |
| NC Ar | 278.6 | 310.2 | 350.3 | - | - | 5.5 |
| NC Ar/O2 | 228.5 | 261.0 | 309.0 | 22.5 | 436.9 | 7.6 |
| NC Ar/N2 | 261.4 | 294.3 | 350.1 | - | - | 8.1 |
| NC Ar/N2 (E15) | 250.4 | 290.2 | 343.6 | 23.8 | 474.5 | 4.1 |
| NC Ar/N2 (E30) | 241.9 | 282.6 | 340.2 | 31.8 | 486.4 | 6.5 |
| NC Ar/NH3 | 237.3 | 268.4 | 323.6 | 20.4 | 436.6 | 6.9 |
| NC Ar-ACN | 241.2 | 289.0 | 333.8 | - | - | 8.3 |
Figure 7Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra of untreated and plasma treated NC (a); zoomed-in regions (775–675 cm−1) (b) and (1750–1500 cm−1) (c) of the same spectra.
Relative atomic concentrations of carbon, oxygen, and nitrogen.
| Samples | C1s (%) | O1s (%) | N1s (%) | O/C | N/C |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 63.8 | 35.0 | 1.2 | 0.55 | 0.02 |
|
| 62.9 | 36.2 | 0.9 | 0.57 | 0.01 |
|
| 63.5 | 35.1 | 1.4 | 0.55 | 0.02 |
|
| 64.6 | 33.9 | 1.5 | 0.52 | 0.02 |
|
| 61.4 | 37.5 | 1.1 | 0.61 | 0.02 |
|
| 61.0 | 38.2 | 0.8 | 0.63 | 0.01 |
|
| 65.4 | 33.2 | 1.4 | 0.51 | 0.02 |
|
| 63.2 | 34.4 | 2.4 | 0.54 | 0.04 |
Figure 8High resolution spectra of C1s region with deconvolution (different colored C1–C4 components) for pristine NC (a) and plasma treated NC: NC-Ar (b); NC Ar/O2 (c); NC Ar/N2 (d); NC Ar/N2 (E15) (e); NC Ar/N2 (E30) (f); NC Ar/NH3 (g), and NC Ar-ACN (h).
Percentage of components from the total amount of carbon C1s and O1s.
| Samples | C1s Components | O1s Components | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1 (%) | C2 (%) | C3 (%) | C4 (%) | O1 (%) | O2 (%) | O3 (%) | |
|
| 19.7 | 55.3 | 20.7 | 4.2 | 2.9 | 87.5 | 9.6 |
|
| 17.9 | 53.2 | 23.5 | 5.4 | 3.1 | 85.2 | 11.7 |
|
| 20.2 | 56.8 | 20.1 | 2.9 | 3.1 | 88.9 | 8.1 |
|
| 23.1 | 49.4 | 23.6 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 85.0 | 11.0 |
|
| 12.5 | 66.9 | 19.7 | 0.8 | 2.2 | 96.1 | 1.7 |
|
| 12.1 | 66.9 | 20.3 | 0.7 | 1.9 | 96.4 | 1.8 |
|
| 24.9 | 54.5 | 17.6 | 2.9 | 3.6 | 88.0 | 8.4 |
|
| 18.3 | 53.6 | 22.6 | 5.6 | 3.4 | 82.7 | 13.9 |
Figure 9High resolution N1s spectra with deconvolution (different colored N1–N4 components) of pristine NC (a); NC Ar/N2 (E30) (b); NC Ar/NH3 (c), and NC Ar-ACN sample (d).
Figure 10TGA (a) and DTG (b) curves for poly (3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB) nanocomposites containing plasma functionalized NC.
Thermal (T and T) and mechanical characteristics (tensile strength and Young’s modulus) of PHB-NC nanocomposites.
| Nanocomposites | Tensile Strength (MPa) | Young’s Modulus (MPa) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 26.0 ± 1.4 | 1324 ± 62 | 269.0 | 281.9 |
|
| 29.5 ± 0.7 | 1358 ± 49 | 262.2 | 276.0 |
|
| 29.0 ± 1.1 | 1387 ± 59 | 263.6 | 277.2 |
|
| 28.5 ± 0.6 | 1395 ± 30 | 260.2 | 273.8 |
|
| 29.1 ± 0.5 | 1307 ± 41 | 265.5 | 279.5 |
|
| 29.8 ± 0.5 | 1309 ± 55 | 268.9 | 282.5 |
|
| 29.2 ± 0.9 | 1402 ± 55 | 260.8 | 273.0 |
|
| 30.6 ± 0.3 | 1408 ± 22 | 269.1 | 281.9 |