| Literature DB >> 29949908 |
Teayeop Kim1, Mun Kyoung Kim2, Yunjeong Park3, Eunpa Kim4, Jangho Kim5, Wonhyoung Ryu6, Hyung Mo Jeong7, Kyunghoon Kim8.
Abstract
Carbon nanotubes are frequently selected for supercapacitors because of their major intrinsic properties of mechanical and chemical stability, in addition to their excellent electrical conductivity. However, electrodes using carbon nanotubes suffer from severe performance degradation by the phenomenon of re-stacking during fabrication, which hinders ion accessibility. In this study, short single-wall carbon nanotubes were further shortened by sonication-induced cutting to increase the proportion of edge sites. This longitudinally short structure preferentially exposes the active edge sites, leading to high capacitance during operation. Supercapacitors assembled using the shorter-cut nanotubes exhibit a 7-fold higher capacitance than those with pristine single-wall nanotubes while preserving other intrinsic properties of carbon nanotubes, including excellent cycle performance and rate capability. The unique structure suggests a design approach for achieving a high specific capacitance with those low-dimensional carbon materials that suffer from re-stacking during device fabrication.Entities:
Keywords: carbon nanotube; energy storage; functionalized CNT; supercapacitor
Year: 2018 PMID: 29949908 PMCID: PMC6071298 DOI: 10.3390/nano8070464
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1(a) The schematic of the synthesis process of short-cut SWNT (c-SWNT) and photographs of carbon nanotube suspension before and after cutting process (b) Schematic illustration of the supercapacitor structure (i) and electrodes using (ii) SWNTs and (iii) c-SWNTs. The short structure of c-SWNT preferentially exposes the active edge sites during operation.
Figure 2The HR-TEM images of (a) as-purchased SWNTs; and (b,c) functionalized c-SWNTs after sonication cutting.
Figure 3The Raman spectra of SWNT and c-SWNT.
Figure 4The FT-IR spectra of SWNT, MAP, and c-SWNT.
Figure 5The CV curves of (a) SWNT electrodes and (b) c-SWNT electrodes at various scan rates from 1 to 100 mV s−1. Note the different current scales in (a,b).
Figure 6The charge/discharge profiles of (a) SWNT electrodes and (b) c-SWNT electrodes at current densities from 0.5 to 3 A g−1.
Figure 7The rate capabilities of SWNT and c-SWNT electrodes at current densities from 0.2 to 30 A g−1.
Figure 8The cycle retention of SWNT (blue) and c-SWNT (red) electrodes at a current density. The first 1500 cycles were performed at 5 A g−1, followed by an additional 1000 cycles at 1 A g−1.