Ulf Andreasson1,2, Julia Kuhlmann3, Josef Pannee1,2, Robert M Umek4, Erik Stoops5, Hugo Vanderstichele5, Anja Matzen6, Manu Vandijck7, Martine Dauwe7, Andreas Leinenbach8, Sandra Rutz8, Erik Portelius1,2, Ingrid Zegers3, Henrik Zetterberg1,2,9,10, Kaj Blennow1,2. 1. Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, The Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden. 2. Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden. 3. European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Directorate F - Health, Consumers and Reference Materials, Geel, Belgium. 4. Meso Scale Diagnostics, LLC, Rockville, MD, USA. 5. ADx NeuroSciences, Gent, Belgium. 6. IBL International GmbH, Hamburg, Germany. 7. Fujirebio Europe N.V., Gent, Belgium. 8. Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Penzberg, Germany. 9. Department of Molecular Neuroscience, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, UK. 10. Uk Dementia Research Institute, London, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The core Alzheimer's disease cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers total tau (T-tau), phosphorylated tau (P-tau), β-amyloid 1-42 (Aβ42) and β-amyloid 1-40 (Aβ40) are increasing in importance and are now part of the research criteria for the diagnosis of the disease. The main aim of this study is to evaluate whether a set of certified reference materials (CRMs) are commutable for Aβ42 and to serve as a feasibility study for the other markers. This property is a prerequisite for the establishment of CRMs which will then be used by manufacturers to calibrate their assays against. Once the preanalytical factors have been standardized and proper selection criteria are available for subject cohorts this harmonization between methods will allow for universal cut-offs to be determined. METHODS: Thirty-four individual CSF samples and three different CRMs where analyzed for T-tau, P-tau, Aβ42 and Aβ40, using up to seven different commercially available methods. For Aβ40 and Aβ42 a mass spectrometry-based procedure was also employed. RESULTS: There were strong pairwise correlations between the different methods (Spearman's ρ>0.92) for all investigated analytes and the CRMs were not distinguishable from the individual samples. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the CRMs are commutable for the different assays for Aβ42. For the other analytes the results show that it would be feasible to also produce CRMs for these. However, additional studies are needed as the concentration interval for the CRMs were selected based on Aβ42 concentrations only and did in general not cover satisfactory large concentration intervals for the other analytes.
BACKGROUND: The core Alzheimer's disease cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers total tau (T-tau), phosphorylated tau (P-tau), β-amyloid 1-42 (Aβ42) and β-amyloid 1-40 (Aβ40) are increasing in importance and are now part of the research criteria for the diagnosis of the disease. The main aim of this study is to evaluate whether a set of certified reference materials (CRMs) are commutable for Aβ42 and to serve as a feasibility study for the other markers. This property is a prerequisite for the establishment of CRMs which will then be used by manufacturers to calibrate their assays against. Once the preanalytical factors have been standardized and proper selection criteria are available for subject cohorts this harmonization between methods will allow for universal cut-offs to be determined. METHODS: Thirty-four individual CSF samples and three different CRMs where analyzed for T-tau, P-tau, Aβ42 and Aβ40, using up to seven different commercially available methods. For Aβ40 and Aβ42 a mass spectrometry-based procedure was also employed. RESULTS: There were strong pairwise correlations between the different methods (Spearman's ρ>0.92) for all investigated analytes and the CRMs were not distinguishable from the individual samples. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the CRMs are commutable for the different assays for Aβ42. For the other analytes the results show that it would be feasible to also produce CRMs for these. However, additional studies are needed as the concentration interval for the CRMs were selected based on Aβ42 concentrations only and did in general not cover satisfactory large concentration intervals for the other analytes.
Authors: Raju Kapoor; Kathryn E Smith; Mark Allegretta; Douglas L Arnold; William Carroll; Manuel Comabella; Roberto Furlan; Christopher Harp; Jens Kuhle; David Leppert; Tatiana Plavina; Finn Sellebjerg; Caroline Sincock; Charlotte E Teunissen; Ilir Topalli; Florian von Raison; Elizabeth Walker; Robert J Fox Journal: Neurology Date: 2020-07-16 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Alexandra N Trelle; Valerie A Carr; Edward N Wilson; Michelle S Swarovski; Madison P Hunt; Tyler N Toueg; Tammy T Tran; Divya Channappa; Nicole K Corso; Monica K Thieu; Manasi Jayakumar; Ayesha Nadiadwala; Wanjia Guo; Natalie J Tanner; Jeffrey D Bernstein; Celia P Litovsky; Scott A Guerin; Anna M Khazenzon; Marc B Harrison; Brian K Rutt; Gayle K Deutsch; Frederick T Chin; Guido A Davidzon; Jacob N Hall; Sharon J Sha; Carolyn A Fredericks; Katrin I Andreasson; Geoffrey A Kerchner; Anthony D Wagner; Elizabeth C Mormino Journal: Neurology Date: 2021-01-06 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Jessica Samuelsson; Silke Kern; Henrik Zetterberg; Kaj Blennow; Elisabet Rothenberg; Ola Wallengren; Ingmar Skoog; Anna Zettergren Journal: Alzheimers Dement (N Y) Date: 2021-05-18
Authors: A Leuzy; N J Ashton; N Mattsson-Carlgren; A Dodich; M Boccardi; J Corre; A Drzezga; A Nordberg; R Ossenkoppele; H Zetterberg; K Blennow; G B Frisoni; V Garibotto; O Hansson Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2021-03-05 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Charisse Somers; Piotr Lewczuk; Anne Sieben; Christine Van Broeckhoven; Peter Paul De Deyn; Johannes Kornhuber; Jean-Jacques Martin; Maria Bjerke; Sebastiaan Engelborghs Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2019 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Sébastien Boulo; Julia Kuhlmann; Ulf Andreasson; Britta Brix; Iswariya Venkataraman; Victor Herbst; Sandra Rutz; Ekaterina Manuilova; Manu Vandijck; Filip Dekeyser; Maria Bjerke; Josef Pannee; Jean Charoud-Got; Guy Auclair; Stéphane Mazoua; Gregor Pinski; Stefanie Trapmann; Heinz Schimmel; Hendrik Emons; Milena Quaglia; Erik Portelius; Magdalena Korecka; Leslie M Shaw; Mary Lame; Erin Chambers; Hugo Vanderstichele; Erik Stoops; Andreas Leinenbach; Tobias Bittner; Rand G Jenkins; Vesna Kostanjevecki; Piotr Lewczuk; Johan Gobom; Henrik Zetterberg; Ingrid Zegers; Kaj Blennow Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2020-08-04 Impact factor: 21.566