Literature DB >> 29949461

Active Inference, Belief Propagation, and the Bethe Approximation.

Sarah Schwöbel1, Stefan Kiebel2, Dimitrije Marković3.   

Abstract

When modeling goal-directed behavior in the presence of various sources of uncertainty, planning can be described as an inference process. A solution to the problem of planning as inference was previously proposed in the active inference framework in the form of an approximate inference scheme based on variational free energy. However, this approximate scheme was based on the mean-field approximation, which assumes statistical independence of hidden variables and is known to show overconfidence and may converge to local minima of the free energy. To better capture the spatiotemporal properties of an environment, we reformulated the approximate inference process using the so-called Bethe approximation. Importantly, the Bethe approximation allows for representation of pairwise statistical dependencies. Under these assumptions, the minimizer of the variational free energy corresponds to the belief propagation algorithm, commonly used in machine learning. To illustrate the differences between the mean-field approximation and the Bethe approximation, we have simulated agent behavior in a simple goal-reaching task with different types of uncertainties. Overall, the Bethe agent achieves higher success rates in reaching goal states. We relate the better performance of the Bethe agent to more accurate predictions about the consequences of its own actions. Consequently, active inference based on the Bethe approximation extends the application range of active inference to more complex behavioral tasks.

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29949461     DOI: 10.1162/neco_a_01108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neural Comput        ISSN: 0899-7667            Impact factor:   2.026


  7 in total

1.  Meta-control of the exploration-exploitation dilemma emerges from probabilistic inference over a hierarchy of time scales.

Authors:  Dimitrije Marković; Thomas Goschke; Stefan J Kiebel
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Neuronal message passing using Mean-field, Bethe, and Marginal approximations.

Authors:  Thomas Parr; Dimitrije Markovic; Stefan J Kiebel; Karl J Friston
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 3.  The two kinds of free energy and the Bayesian revolution.

Authors:  Sebastian Gottwald; Daniel A Braun
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 4.  Active inference on discrete state-spaces: A synthesis.

Authors:  Lancelot Da Costa; Thomas Parr; Noor Sajid; Sebastijan Veselic; Victorita Neacsu; Karl Friston
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 2.223

5.  Neural Dynamics under Active Inference: Plausibility and Efficiency of Information Processing.

Authors:  Lancelot Da Costa; Thomas Parr; Biswa Sengupta; Karl Friston
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 2.524

6.  Active Inference and Epistemic Value in Graphical Models.

Authors:  Thijs van de Laar; Magnus Koudahl; Bart van Erp; Bert de Vries
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2022-04-06

7.  On Epistemics in Expected Free Energy for Linear Gaussian State Space Models.

Authors:  Magnus T Koudahl; Wouter M Kouw; Bert de Vries
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 2.524

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.