Literature DB >> 29948807

Implementation of the Chronic Care Model to Reduce Disparities in Hypertension Control: Benefits Take Time.

Barbara J Turner1,2, Julie A Parish-Johnson3, Yuanyuan Liang3,4, Tracy Jeffers5, Shruthi V Arismendez3, Ramin Poursani6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Chronic Care Model (CCM) has been endorsed by experts to reduce disparities in chronic disease outcomes but benefits may be slow to appear in low-income populations.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of CCM implementation on systolic blood pressure (SBP) control in minority patients with diabetes mellitus (DM).
DESIGN: Retrospective study from 2012 to 2016 in two primary care clinics with primarily uninsured, Hispanic patients. PATIENTS: Four 2-year cohorts of patients aged 18-75 with DM and SBP ≥ 140 mmHg on HTN drugs in year 1 and SBP measured 1 year later in year 2. INTERVENTION: Implementation of CCM for DM in January 2014 involved: electronic medical record revision, a DM registry, hypertension (HTN) treatment protocol, team education, performance feedback, and case management. MAIN MEASURE: SBP < 140 mmHg in year 2. KEY
RESULTS: Of 2354 patients, the mean age was 56.2 (SD 9.5), baseline SBP 153.8 (SD 14.9) mmHg, and 79.8% Hispanic. Last SBP < 140 mmHg was 58.4% for cohort 1 (2012-2013) and 68.5% for cohort 4 (2015-2016). Adjusted odds ratios (AORs) for SBP control versus cohort 1 were 1.35 (95% CI 1.07, 1.69) for cohort 3 (2014-2015) and 2.13 (95% CI 1.60, 2.80) for cohort 4. AORs for SBP control were reduced by 15% per HTN drug at baseline (P = 0.001), 9% per HTN drug added at last SBP (P = 0.024), and 22% for multi-dose HTN drugs (P = 0.004). Among patients with persistent elevated SBP and represented in multiple cohorts, AORs for control were still over 2-fold higher for cohort 4 versus cohort 1.
CONCLUSIONS: After adopting the CCM for primarily Hispanic patients with DM, SBP control increased significantly despite treatment with fewer HTN drugs. Yet improvement took 3-4 years, suggesting that financial rewards for using the CCM to achieve improved clinical outcomes for low-income, minority patients may be delayed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chronic disease management; diabetes mellitus; patient-centered care; quality improvement

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29948807      PMCID: PMC6108988          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-018-4526-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  22 in total

1.  Effect of pay-for-performance incentives on quality of care in small practices with electronic health records: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Naomi S Bardach; Jason J Wang; Samantha F De Leon; Sarah C Shih; W John Boscardin; L Elizabeth Goldman; R Adams Dudley
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Evidence on the Chronic Care Model in the new millennium.

Authors:  Katie Coleman; Brian T Austin; Cindy Brach; Edward H Wagner
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 3.  1. Promoting Health and Reducing Disparities in Populations.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 19.112

4.  Cost-effectiveness of implementing the chronic care model for diabetes care in a military population.

Authors:  Shihchen Kuo; Cindy L Bryce; Janice C Zgibor; Donna L Wolf; Mark S Roberts; Kenneth J Smith
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-05-01

5.  Disparities in the Prevalence of Diagnosed Diabetes - United States, 1999-2002 and 2011-2014.

Authors:  Gloria L Beckles; Chiu-Fang Chou
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 17.586

6.  Missed appointments and poor glycemic control: an opportunity to identify high-risk diabetic patients.

Authors:  Andrew J Karter; Melissa M Parker; Howard H Moffet; Ameena T Ahmed; Assiamira Ferrara; Jennifer Y Liu; Joe V Selby
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Improved blood pressure control associated with a large-scale hypertension program.

Authors:  Marc G Jaffe; Grace A Lee; Joseph D Young; Stephen Sidney; Alan S Go
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Hypertension Prevalence and Control Among Adults: United States, 2011-2014.

Authors:  Sung Sug Sarah Yoon; Margaret D Carroll; Cheryl D Fryar
Journal:  NCHS Data Brief       Date:  2015-11

Review 9.  Understanding adherence to medications in type 2 diabetes care and clinical trials to overcome barriers: a narrative review.

Authors:  Margaret Tiktin; Selda Celik; Lori Berard
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 2.580

10.  Hypertension control in ambulatory care patients with diabetes.

Authors:  Rhonda Belue; Adetokunbo N Oluwole; Arnold N F Degboe; M Kathleen Figaro
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.229

View more
  2 in total

1.  Racial/ethnic and HIV risk category disparities in preexposure prophylaxis discontinuation among patients in publicly funded primary care clinics.

Authors:  Hyman M Scott; Matthew Spinelli; Eric Vittinghoff; Alicia Morehead-Gee; Anne Hirozawa; Catherine James; Hali Hammer; Albert Liu; Monica Gandhi; Susan Buchbinder
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 4.177

2.  Continuity of Care and the Control of High Blood Pressure at Colombian Primary Care Services.

Authors:  Lena Barrera; Diana Oviedo; Alvaro Silva; Diego Tovar; Fabián Méndez
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 1.730

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.