| Literature DB >> 29948635 |
Islam Abdelmoneim1, Ayman Sadek1, Mohamed Ahmed Mosaad1, Ibrahim Yassin1, Yasser Radwan1, Khalid Shokry2, Ahmed Magdy2, Mohammed Yasser Elsherbeny3, Abdelrahman Ibrahim Abushouk4.
Abstract
We performed this study to compare the sensitivity and specificity of multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) to coronary angiography (CA) in detecting coronary total occlusion (CTO) lesion characteristics. Moreover, we analyzed the association between these characteristics and the risk of revascularization failure. Fifty patients with confirmed CTO diagnosis were tried for revascularization using the antegrade (all 50) or retrograde (in failed nine antegrade interventions) approaches. Each patient underwent CA and MSCT before the intervention and data from both modalities were compared using the SPSS software. Successful revascularization occurred in 36 (72%) and 6 (66.7%) patients of the antegrade and retrograde groups, respectively. Compared to CA, MSCT exhibited high sensitivity in detecting CTO segment calcification (100%), size of the affected vessel (100%, area under the curve [AUC] = 0.82), distal filling of the affected segment (97.7%) and side-branching at the CTO segment (93.3%). However, it had lower sensitivity in detecting collaterals (75%) and the length of the affected segment (87.5%, AUC = 0.77). According to MSCT data, increased occlusion length > 18 mm (p = 0.01), atherosclerotic vessel wall (p = 0.02), small distal vessel size ≤ 2.75 mm (p = 0.002), proximal side-branching (p = 0.01) and calcification of the proximal cap (p = 0.007) or distal stump (p = 0.01) were associated with an increased risk of revascularization failure. MSCT exhibited high sensitivity in identifying several CTO lesion characteristics, such as lesional calcification and size of the affected vessel. However, further research is needed to improve the diagnostic accuracy of this modality and define the predictors of revascularization failure in CTO patients.Entities:
Keywords: Computed tomography; Coronary angiography; Coronary occlusion; Percutaneous coronary intervention
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29948635 DOI: 10.1007/s10554-018-1392-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging ISSN: 1569-5794 Impact factor: 2.357