Literature DB >> 29948512

Sex Differences in the Genetic and Environmental Influences on Self-Reported Non-aggressive and Aggressive Conduct Disorder Symptoms in Early and Middle Adolescence.

Carol A Van Hulle1, Irwin Waldman2, Benjamin B Lahey3.   

Abstract

Decades of research into the etiology of conduct disorder (CD) has yet to yield a consensus on the existence of sex differences in underlying genetic and environmental influences. This may be partly due to the failure of many previous studies to make a distinction between non-aggressive and aggressive CD symptoms or test for potential developmental changes in sex differences in the etiology of conduct problems. To address these gaps, we fit a series of univariate and bivariate biometric sex-difference models to self-reported non-aggressive and aggressive CD symptoms in a community-based sample of twins (N = 1548, ages 9-17 year), grouped into ages 9-13 and 14-17 years. Relative model fit was evaluated using the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), which favors parsimony, and by Chi square difference tests. The univariate sex-scalar model provided the best fit to the data for both non-aggressive and aggressive CD symptoms at ages 9-13 and 14-17 years. Thus, the same genetic and environmental factors influenced CD symptoms in both sexes, but the total variability was lower in females than males. At both ages, the heritability of non-aggressive CD symptoms was lower than heritability of aggressive CD symptoms, and shared environmental effects were only observed for non-aggressive CD symptoms. However, estimates for genetic and environmental factors could be not be constrained to be equal across age groups for either CD subtype, suggesting substantive developmental changes in the relative influence of genetic and environmental factors on individual differences in CD symptoms. For both subtypes, the heritability was larger, and shared environmental effect smaller, in the older age group than the younger age group. A bivariate quantitative sex differences model provided the best fit to the data at ages 9-13 years. Covariation between non-aggressive and aggressive CD symptoms was due to overlapping shared and non-shared environmental factors in males and females but the overall covariation was greater in males than females. In contrast, at ages 14-17 years, the sex-scalar bivariate model provided the best fit to the data, and covariation between non-aggressive and aggressive CD symptoms was due to overlapping genetic and non-shared environmental factors. Thus, the etiology of self-reported conduct disorder varied substantially by symptom type and age. However, quantitative sex differences were only apparent when the covariation between the two subtypes was considered.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescents; Behavior genetics; Conduct problems; Sex differences; Twins

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29948512      PMCID: PMC6051422          DOI: 10.1007/s10519-018-9907-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Genet        ISSN: 0001-8244            Impact factor:   2.805


  30 in total

Review 1.  Adolescent brain development: a period of vulnerabilities and opportunities. Keynote address.

Authors:  Ronald E Dahl
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  Comparing Alternative Biometric Models with and without Gene-by-Measured Environment Interaction in Behavior Genetic Designs: Statistical Operating Characteristics.

Authors:  Hao Zheng; Carol A Van Hulle; Paul J Rathouz
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2015-02-28       Impact factor: 2.805

3.  Adolescent self-report of emotional and behavioral problems: interactions of genetic factors with sex and age.

Authors:  Meike Bartels; Niels van de Aa; Catherina E M van Beijsterveldt; Christel M Middeldorp; Dorret I Boomsma
Journal:  J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2011-02

Review 4.  Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: a developmental taxonomy.

Authors:  T E Moffitt
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Adjustment of twin data for the effects of age and sex.

Authors:  M McGue; T J Bouchard
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 2.805

6.  Early disruptive behavior, poor school achievement, delinquent behavior, and delinquent personality: longitudinal analyses.

Authors:  R E Tremblay; B Masse; D Perron; M Leblanc; A E Schwartzman; J E Ledingham
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1992-02

7.  The genetic and environmental overlap between aggressive and non-aggressive antisocial behavior in children and adolescents using the self-report delinquency interview (SR-DI).

Authors:  Pan Wang; Sharon Niv; Catherine Tuvblad; Adrian Raine; Laura A Baker
Journal:  J Crim Justice       Date:  2013-09

8.  Causes of stability of aggression from early childhood to adolescence: a longitudinal genetic analysis in Dutch twins.

Authors:  C E M van Beijsterveldt; M Bartels; J J Hudziak; D I Boomsma
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.805

9.  A study of problem behaviors in 10- to 15-year-old biologically related and unrelated international adoptees.

Authors:  E J van den Oord; D I Boomsma; F C Verhulst
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 2.805

10.  The etiological moderation of aggressive and nonaggressive antisocial behavior by age.

Authors:  S Alexandra Burt; Kelly L Klump
Journal:  Twin Res Hum Genet       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.587

View more
  1 in total

1.  Mild Traumatic Brain Injury as a Predictor of Classes of Youth Internalizing and Externalizing Psychopathology.

Authors:  Brandon F McCormick; Eric J Connolly; David V Nelson
Journal:  Child Psychiatry Hum Dev       Date:  2020-05-05
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.